The abusive treatment of 1/6 defendants -- imprisoned before trial in solitary -- is largely ignored due to fear of being accused of sympathizing with them if you object:

Just as neocons accused those who objected to the abuses of the 1st War on Terror of sympathy for Al Qaeda.
The ACLU -- when asked by @KerryPicket of the @dcexaminer -- agreed that the pre-trial conditions of imprisonment for the January 6 defendants were abusive and unjust:

washingtonexaminer.com/news/aclu-capi…
Meanwhile, numerous GOP members of the House and Senate -- elected to represent Americans and govern the US -- have been obsessing on "fixing" Cuba while ignoring domestic abuses, leading to right-wing satire like this:

Liberals and neocons are in an enduring coalition because their mentality is the same.

That's why Liz Cheney, Bill Kristol and David Frum fit far more comfortably with Democrats than the GOP.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

29 Jul
I again have to ask: if the primary goal now is to persuade vaccine skeptics that the vaccine works and they should take it for the benefit of returning to normal life, what message do dreary images like this -- from leading officials who are fully vaccinated -- send to them??
Liberals now have a strong need to malign those who are vaccine hesitant as stupid, reckless troglodytes. They're only comfortable doing that if the unvaccinated are mostly Trump supporters. But the demographics of vaccine resisters are much more complex, so they just lie.
I got the vaccine and encourage anyone who asks my advice to do so, though I think it should be everyone's choice. Precisely because I believe in the vaccine's efficacy, I'm amazed the messaging of govt officials is becoming more, not less, coercive, didactic and alarmist. Image
Read 5 tweets
28 Jul
Really worth reading this NYT op-ed about COVID, vaccines and masks from @aaronecarroll. As he points out, it was always known there'd be breakthrough infections with the vaccines. The goal was to render it less harmful. That's working. Nothing changed.

nytimes.com/2021/07/27/opi…
There are some who insist nobody question the decrees of Govt agencies (though that only applies when they hear what they want: they maligned CDC's May lifting of its no-mask policy).

But given how quickly and and radically these messages shift, it's rational to question them.
When even authority-revering CNN is starting to notice and say that the CDC's manic shifts in guidance don't seem to make sense and should be questioned -- or at least aren't being communicated clearly -- you know there's a problem:

Read 4 tweets
27 Jul
A major reason faith and trust was lost in the COVID pronouncements of media and public health experts was how brazenly they politicized their directives.

Quibble with some of the examples in this great thread but the message was clear: protests were allowed only if liberal.
For a full year, liberals vilified anyone who questioned CDC guidance or governors who deviated in any way.

Then, when CDC told vaccinated people they need not wear masks, they vilified those *followed the CDC guidelines.* It was never about Science:

(And, to be clear, I've never been anti-mask. I've always worn masks outside the house and still do because that's the law in Brazil, where vaccines still aren't available to all adults. But CDC guidance is important because it fosters a return to normal life: vital for health).
Read 7 tweets
26 Jul
Liberals need 1/6 to be some momentous event because it gives them purpose and vindication.

Journalists need it because, for many, it was the most exciting and scary thing they ever did.

The security state loves it because it's what justifies their power and budget.
Acting as if 1/6 was some sort of serious "insurrection" is just pitiful.

None of the defendants has been charged with sedition, fomenting insurrection, attempted murder or anything like that. Because it wasn't that. It was a protest that turned into a 3-hour riot.
2 of the 4 people who died on 1/6 were Trump supporters who dropped dead of heart attacks.

Another was a Trump supporter who died of a speed overdose.

The 4th was an unarmed Trump supporter shot point blank in the neck and killed by a still-unknown armed agent of the state.
Read 5 tweets
25 Jul
These are staggering new poll numbers from @USATODAY on the views of Detroit residents on issues of crime and policing, and constitute yet more evidence of how wide the gap is between the discourse of media elites on these questions and everyone else:

usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
"Amid a jump in violent crime in this and other cities nationwide, Detroit residents report being much more worried about public safety than about police misconduct....

By an overwhelming 9-1, they would feel safer with more cops on the street, not fewer."
Black residents in Detroit care much more about stopping violent crime than they do reforming the police. White residents care more about reforming the police by a small margin.

Who is most victimized by crime and who isn't is a huge factor in the discourse on these issues.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jul
FBI Using the Same Fear Tactic From the First War on Terror: Orchestrating its Own Terrorism Plots

greenwald.substack.com/p/fbi-using-th…
Questioning the FBI's role in 1/6 was maligned by corporate media as deranged. But only ignorance or a desire to deceive could produce such a reaction.

To keep fear levels high and the US security state's powers and budgets even higher, FBI has been doing this for decades.
A top FBI official has *admitted* in a little-noticed comment -- part of a documentary about an FBI attempt to entrap "terrorists" in 2009 -- that the FBI needs constant terror threats and plots to keep fear levels high and its own power unquestioned. Look:
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(