Thread by @SovMichael

(1)There is a reason why I focused on the Motte & Bailey fallacy:
Do you think that men who have been lying to you over the past 10 years are not going to continue to lie to you when their ideological strategy has been exposed?

Of course not. They will just use another strategy

(2) To continue the dialectic of transition within the Christian faith, they will now retreat to a much more "reasonable" position and claim that they "have been misunderstood."

Because they know that is just a matter of time before they will win.

(3) So now it is just a game of ideological survival.

Endure the storm, come out on the other end, continue to say that the larger movement is a "conspiracy."

They won't be removed from their positions. They will seem "reasonable."

And the dialectic continues.

(4) And one again I would say "live not by lies"

Men who have lied in the past, men who helped the "big lie" grow in previously conservative organizations will just keep on lying to preserve their positions and continue the trajectory.

And the dialectic continues...

And somewhere along the way you might begin to realize that you - politician, ceo, pastor, leader - are in the middle of a non-kinetic war of information where all the same rules apply to kinetic warfare.

And every decision you make matters.