Immediately following the Colombini accident (see yesterday's thread), the @RadiologyACR convened what they called a 'blue ribbon panel' on MRI safety. That group published the first MRI safety best practice manual in 2002.
That specific document was expanded and re-released in 2004, 2007, 2013, and most recently in 2020.
The UK's @MHRAgovuk released MRI safety guidelines in 2007. Also in 2007, the @RANZCRcollege released their MRI safety guidelines (borrowing heavily from the ACR's publicaitons).
The @TJCommission released their Sentinel Event Alert on MRI accidents in 2008 (later deferring to the ACR's publications), and Diagnostic Imaging Standards in 2015.
Plus there have been many articles, journal articles, and training resources made available.
In the past 20 years there has been explosive growth in MRI safety best practice published knowledge. We have remarkably greater access to MRI safety information than at any previous time in MRI's history.
But it's not just the body of accessible knowledge that has changed in the last 2 decades, so too have MRI's risks.
Magnets are stronger. Fields are more compact (higher SFGs). Pulse sequences use more RF energy. Thinner slices and faster acquisitions means more dB/dt energy.
And that's just the hardware!
MRI patients are bigger (more RF), imaged at higher acuities, subject to intervention during MRI, with a vast range of implants and devices that were outright prohibited 20 years ago.
And in this time frame, reimbursements for MRI procedures have dropped, dramatically. With large fixed expenses for equipment and building, the single biggest cost-cutting option available to operators is staffing, so MRI's are often operated by fewer techs then 20 years ago.
The economic reality of clinical MRI, today, is often "do more with less." Scan more patients, in less time, with fewer people (and/or people who can be paid less).
So apart from the fact that there's still an MRI scanner at the heart of MRI imaging, and that these are typically in hospitals or imaging centers, nearly everything else about the safety of MRI imaging has changed -dramatically- in the last 20 years.
So *both* MRI safety knowledge and MRI risks have grown, significantly, in the last 2 decades, but they're *not* in a close race. Growth in reported MRI adverse events suggests that the risks have been growing faster than our ability to put our knowledge into effective practice.
Tomorrow we're going to touch on what *hasn't* changed, in terms of standards and structures to keep patients (and caregivers) safe, and we hope you'll return for that very important 'flip side' of MRI safety.
As always, we invite you to 'like' and 'RT' our threads generously to help your Twitter friends and colleagues see this information.
We also invite you to follow us for daily doses of #MRIsafety best practices. Thank you very much.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
20 years ago -almost to the minute- a young boy was being taken to the MRI of the county hospital.
A few days prior he had an accident on the playground and a CT scan of his skull revealed a brain tumor that would likely have killed him, had it not been found.
The boy was transferred from the community hospital to the larger county hospital, where the tumor was confirmed, and brain surgery was planned.
The surgery was a success, and all indications were that the tumor was fully removed and the boy would have a full recovery.
MRI has been labeled as 'the safe modality' by virtue of the fact that it doesn't expose patients to ionizing (potentially cancer-causing) types of radiation that are inherent in X-rays. But this overly-simplistic naming fails to consider that MRI may have it's own risks.
This week, the week that includes the July 27th anniversary of perhaps the most infamous MRI fatality (sadly we now have to qualify it as 'perhaps' as there have been more fatal MRI incidents), is MRI Safety Week.