"You know, sometimes, Black women,
Sometimes we are accused of
You know, when they want to slam you and slander you
Being angry
We can’t be aggressive or assertive
We angry
We can’t be determined
We angry
Well, sisters and brothers,
This morning,
I am here to say to you,
That my name is Nina Turner and I’m a angry-ass Black woman
I’m mad!
I’m mad about a whole lot of stuff, ‘Cause if you ain’t mad about something,
Then, baby, you are not awake!
With these hands, we will rise up!
I’m mad that we gotta beg people in power to know that the wages of everyday people are not keeping up with inflation!
I’m mad as hell that our young people have to graduate with a degree in one hand and debt in the other,
Over a trillion dollars worth of debt!
I’m mad as hell that we gotta beg people to understand
That we must protect Mother Earth!
To have anything!
Oh yeah I’m mad!
That mammas and daddies and grandmammas have to worry about whether or not they babies can walk the streets in America!
We got too much on the line!
Too much on the line, to sit idly by
Too much on the line!
Too much on the line!
But I want us to channel this anger,
This is important,
Channel the anger and the passion that we have into action!
I’m mad that we are not doing enough in this country to shore up
And, guess what?
We taking applications
Everybody can be an angry Black woman!
Join me, ya’ll"
– @ninaturner
(Omitted one word for clarity, but I did not edit to change style or meaning)
Link to ad with this speech:
You are welcome to use and adapt these photos as long as you attribute them to me and share it with the same license:
.@caresource, my managed care of Medicaid just told me that the reason my dermatologist's prior auth. request for tacrolimus for my atopic dermatitis was denied was they would need me to try a specific brand of that med first before they'd approve prior auth. for the generic.
Generics are generally cheaper, right? Who the hell do they think they are serving by only covering a brand name of a particular medication, not its generics? If I hadn't called them, I would have not known and neither would my doctor who didn't get any memo explaining their
policy with the prior authorization denial from @caresource (which is a non-profit tasked with managing a govt. program for poor people, but doesn't seem capable of understanding the attached responsibilities). After that call, I called my dermatologist's office to explain
4/19 @FedEx statement says 4/15 shooting victims' "lives represented different ethnicities and religious faiths," but it doesn't say the word "Sikh" in it at all, even though four out of eight people who were shot and are now dead were Sikh. newsroom.fedex.com/newsroom/india…
I would like the company to acknowledge that these four were Sikhs and commit some money to anti-hatred. More importantly, I would like to see @FedEx stop commiting money to hatred: as in, giving money to Republicans.
This page includes two distinct articles by two authors, and the articles contradict each other. I do not endorse Deb's view because, unlike Minear, they don't provide evidence for assertions.
I'm contradicting the statement on the page that calls both articles "a two-part article."
Deb frames the embarrassment that Dr. Seuss wrote that he had, in the letter to Dartmouth's alumni mag, as him not being proud of his cartoons. I think that's a total misunderstanding,
.@nberlat proposes prioritizing voting and labor rights over M4A for now. He's making people very mad with this view. I also propose prioritizing other things over M4A. Lots of things that are not M4A are essential to tackling COVID.
Not that it should be the only priority, but it's going to take a lot of bandwidth. I think healthcare, immigration, climate change (Green New Deal), Democratic reforms, UBI, labor rights, voting rights, reparations, and foreign policy are all important. But the way to work on
healthcare right now and save hundreds of thousands of lives over the next couple years is to do testing, tracing, limiting congregating way more than we are currently, vaccinations, and paying people every month. I don't know if we, as a country, can do that. But if we don't,
Two notes: 1776 wasn't the start of a revolution in defense of Democracy. Indigenous and Black and poor people of that era would not think of it as that. In addition, Britain already had a democracy. The colonists didn't get to elect members of parliament
but again, when the US was established, women, the poor, Black people, and Indigenous people had no representation, so show me some who cared about King George and "taxation without representation."
2. You can't start a paragraph with "The bad news is" when your previous 25 paragraphs were filled with bad news, and in fact, your entire essay is.
These errors aside, this essay by Zeynep Tufekci is really really good: you should all read it.
Proposing calling the Trump insurrectionists and Trump supporters in general neo-Confederates. I don't have a problem with somewhat imprecise terms. Just add neo which means new therefore implies changes, not just reprisal. Confederates were terrorists, racists, and slave owners.
We should not shy away from Neo-Nazi. I've noticed fascist is commonly used to describe people who probably don't call themselves fascists, but Neo-Nazi is infrequently used for people who don't call themselves Neo-Nazis. Why? If someone hates Jews, Black and Brown people, and
...Muslims, just call them Neo-Nazis unless you're calling them neo-Confederates instead because it fits better.
Also, I personally didn't learn anything about what the fascists did or believed in school, but did learn something about Confederates, slavery, and the Holocaust.