This is how far behind most of the country is: the picture below has gone viral today as Americans "discover" that all of Trumpworld knew violence was coming January 6. The investigation of January 6 by independent journalists has moved so far beyond "What did Steve Bannon know?"
Prior to January 6, Trump was provided with a security assessment for the Capitol by the Secret Service, per Reuters. Bannon was Trump's top political advisor post-election according to numerous media outlets. His minions Stockton and Lawrence were working with the Oath Keepers.
Every attendee at a Trump "war room" event on January 5 either fled the city or fled the Capitol area either before Trump's speech or just after it. None went to the Capitol. The reason is that all of Trump's inner circle knew violence was coming. And that includes Trump himself.
We have video of Proud Boys and even regular Trump voters speaking—on January 5—of storming the Capitol the next day. It was well known amongst those Trump radicals who traveled to DC that the point of the trip was to overrun the Capitol. The idea Bannon alone knew is laughable.
I'm not even getting into the chatter the FBI had picked up—all the FBI informants who were actually at the center of the planning of the attack, like Enrique Tarrio and Joe Biggs—I'm just talking about what rank-and-file Trumpists knew, and what was *widely known* in Trumpworld.
Obviously I'm glad people are talking about who knew what prior to January 6. I just hope major media understands that—more than 6 months after a domestic terror attack on our Capitol—the fact that *so many* Americans know virtually nothing about it is an indictment of our media.
Last night Chris Cuomo of CNN brought on a GOP Tennessee congressman—who spent his time on air arguing in favor of the Big Lie. This is so far removed from major media investigating the meetings of powerful Republicans that preceded January 6 that it's apocalyptically hilarious.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Great news for Substack authors: thumbnail images are back! If you use the "Sections" and "Recommended Links" options—as many of us do—you can now go to your Settings tab and click a box to ensure that thumbnail images are returned to your main and section feeds. Thanks Substack!
(PS) For those who don't use Substack, here's the short version: PROOF looks better than ever now! sethabramson.substack.com
(FOLLOWUP) There's a hitch with the "Archive" tab, but I expect it'll be fixed soon. Right now it shows the most recent articles; you have to click the "Top" tab to see the whole archive (though it's ranked by popularity of article, not date). Hopefully it'll be cleared up soon!
These insurrectionists should already have been subjected to document preservation demands, subpoenas for documents and testimony, interrogations, seizures of digital equipment, Congressional questioning and more. Because nothing has been done, they get to do TV stunts like this.
It's essential that we no longer view these individuals as mere politicians. They're part of an active domestic insurgency that they perpetually incite with both their actions and words behind the scenes and their actions and words in public. They aim to overthrow our government.
This preposterous stunt is in many respects far more sinister than it seems. These are high-profile leaders of a domestic insurgency storming the federal facility where the domestic terrorists they lead are being held—and filming the storming to incite other domestic terrorists.
(🔐) UPDATE: Added Pulitzer Prize winners (35). Will work on Emmy/Murrow Award winners next. Lots of new publications, journalists, Members of Parliament, peers in the House of Lords, and even new members of Congress.
(UPDATE) The "Award Winners" section is complete. I focused mostly on journalism awards, or awards where most of the awards handed out are for journalistic activity. If you'd told me that 146 Emmy Award winners follow PROOF, I would not have believed you. And yet here we are.
(PS) I know this research is esoteric—but it's the sort of thing a researcher does once and then can update easily over time. The utility of the info is expansive, starting with this: it helps readers rebut any who say PROOF isn't being read. Now everyone knows how false that is.
(🔐) ICYMI: Yesterday PROOF answered the second-most-asked question of the PROOF project: "Who's reading your research?" The index below—which includes hundreds and hundreds of names you know from national politics, media and popular culture—will stun you. sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-some-n…
(PS) As I mentioned when I published this index yesterday—and as I noted in the brief essay introducing the index—what you see here is ~30% of what the finished archive will look like. For instance, it names the 79 people at CNN who follow PROOF, but the final tally will be 100+.
(PS2) For those curious about the Congressional list—currently at 50+ (see the list for all names and affiliations)—my guess is that it will land someone between 60 and 70 by the final tally, but it could be higher—this whole indexing process has consistently surprised/amazed me.
(🔓) PROOF UNLOCKED: Congress's investigation of Trump's armed revolt has just begun. If you're unaware of the work indie journalists have been doing on this historic topic, PROOF has you covered. Read these articles to catch up—and please RT this thread! sethabramson.substack.com/p/exclusive-a-…
(🔓) PROOF UNLOCKED: You've heard about the hundreds of Trumpist foot soldiers the FBI has arrested—about 550 so far, with many more to come—but now is the time to get acquainted with the insurrection kingpins. The article below will help get you started. sethabramson.substack.com/p/a-comprehens…
(🔓) PROOF UNLOCKED: More than any federal criminal investigation in U.S. history—and make no mistake, the January 6 investigation is the largest FBI case in history—the key events of January 6 were filmed.
(🔐) NEW at PROOF: Since I started this project in mid-2018, the top question I've been asked is, "Will Trump be held accountable?" The second most-asked question has been, "Is anyone who matters seeing your research?"
1/ This is an issue I should've addressed earlier, and I'm annoyed with myself that I didn't. Critics of the PROOF project benefitted enormously from me not having the time or energy to give readers a sense of how far and wide—in politics and media—PROOF research goes every day.
2/ This one weirdo, who's now been stalking me for 4+ years, asked rhetorically in a 2018 article, "Does anyone still read Seth Abramson?" I was so exhausted by stuff like that—that particular article said I was in a group with a bunch of people I didn't know—I just did nothing.