The Turner-verse complaining about how negative everybody is while running a bullshit smear from a re-hashed Walker Bragman article to call her opponent a criminal is just..........completely expected hypocritical bullshit from the usual suspects.
If you missed how this was all completely manufactured. Basically, The Intercept wrote a smear piece in April on this. Then coincidentally, the week before the election, Walker Bragman for the outlet founded by David Sirota wrote a piece re-hashing the 3 mo old Intercept article
adding basically nothing new. And then because Newsweek is now just a generic content mill, they re-posted the Daily Sirota article, which the Turner campaign then used to show, 'wow even Newsweek says she's corrupt' & slammed the jail cell door in her face.
So basically, the same process the RW media, coordinating w/ GOP campaigns uses to create the air of scandal. Just like it was with Bernie, it's always 'my opponents' who are playing dirty, as we coordinate with our superPACs and accuse everyone else of being a criminal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The difference (for 'it's ok when i do it') is always, 'we're doing it for The People. The People demand it.'
AOC, Bernie Sanders, Cori Bush- they align with The
People of the district. Jim Clyburn and the other members of the CBC...just completely out of touch with the district (that voted overwhelmingly for Biden)
"It's 2021"- lol her latest 'bowl of shit' comments were not even a year ago. This from the same people who tried to make 'Hillary/Biden's comments from 1983 are disqualifying & if you think otherwise, you're just a Dem shill." Give me a break.
Nina could have stayed in her cushy private lobbyist job & no one would be talking about this. But no, she chose to run for federal office, as a Democrat. Her actions of the past 5 yrs are way more relevant than w/e marginally 'left' policy position she's choosing to run on.
Circling circling circling. Wagons keep on circling.
(we've reached the inevitable stage where, in response to overwhelming criticism, all the other beltway journalists tweet about how great & indispensable journalist X is- those dumb dumb readers just don't understand).
What Rachael offered up was a completely subjective opinion- as if it was just an objective fact- devoid of context and stated definitively. She (& other political hacks journos) created a narrative based on nothing but her own opinion and very rightfully got pushback on it.
#Actually, you're just not intelligent enough to understand my extremely savvy point. Unlike you all, I have a very high IQ