tweeps: there’s a huge gulf between …. the quality of debate & discussion I see on here - and …: the reasoning from many of the paid opinionists in U.K. broadsheet press +
+ I follow liberals, Liberals, leftists, anarchists, Tories, self-described centrists and people I’ve no label for. A few professional opinionists but most have other jobs/pastimes.
I find the quality of thinking (& the honesty about what isn’t known) humbling. +
+ of course there grandstanding and bs and even some bad faith.
But if I log on - I find dozens of thoughtful tweets, often showing an angle or a data point I hadn’t seen. Hundreds of people willing to expose themselves to rebuttal, disagreement… +
+ maybe it’s because my tweeps *aren’t* (mostly) insiders. Maybe it’s the medium. I D K. //
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dawn Butler did the right thing. But so did the Speaker by suspending her from Parliament for calling Boris Johnson a liar - and not suspending Johnson. Let me explain (pls don’t reply unless you read the thread) 1/12
Democratic governance depends on debates and facts. But honest debate can’t be guaranteed. Rules and practice can only promote and encourage. 2/
A rule allowing the Speaker to suspend Johnson for his statements would make the Speaker the arbiter of political truths. It would pretend that they can be decided as if by an impartial judge. 3/
Why did @dAaronovitch agree to review - and celebrate - a book promoting the anti-trans movement, when he admits to knowing nothing about Bilek, the anti-semite celebrated by the anti-trans movement, who promotes the conspiracy theory of trans-humanism? Why didn’t he do his job?
On the same day Aaronovitch paraded his ignorance, the gender critical Proud Boys and QAnoners protested at Wi Spa, because a Christian activist invented a tale about a trans woman.
The anti-trans campaigners attacked a Guardian journalist. See thread.
From its creation in 1801 until 1962, the UK had no legal controls on free movement from the British colonies / empire to the UK, when *limited* controls were introduced 2/3
On 1 Jan 1973 UK ended this partial free movement for the colonies, and replaced it with free movement for the EEC. Until 30 Dec 2020. 3/3
Everyone granted leave to remain under UK’s EU Settlement Scheme is told by the Home Office that the “leave is issued in accordance with … the Withdrawal Agreement”. So is Colin right here? 1/