No one ever mentions that McCain was shot down while bombing a civilian target in a densely populated city. The secretary's tribute here to what has become an American military tradition is fitting.
The targets McCain and his fellow airmen bombed had no military value; they took place hundreds of miles from where American soldiers were fighting. The purpose of the bombings was to inflict suffering on civilians severe enough to put pressure on the North Vietnamese government.
If in 1967 North Vietnam had bombed a power plant in Oakland we'd consider it the greatest war crime since Pearl Harbor. (There was in fact a nice short story based on such a premise, but I can't remember the author's name).
For the curious, this is where McCain dropped his bombs before getting shot down. The target is the white structure just above the bridge on the right.
I appreciate how North Vietnam beat us so thoroughly that they are cool with people coming to lay wreaths for war criminals or hunt for small pieces of US airmen in the jungle. The same people took baguettes and coffee away from the French and made them tastier. Pure boss move.
South Vietnam, meanwhile, represents the second great American military tradition of the post WWII era: abandoning the people who fought side by side with you for years to be imprisoned or killed.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pinboard

Pinboard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Pinboard

30 Jul
There was a window of opportunity to make mask-wearing as apolitical as handwashing, but we missed it. And once an issue gets its coattail in the woodchipper of political polarization, it's all over. The process is social media driven, but how to mitigate it is our great crisis
The tendency is to blame "partisan politics", but people have always been opinionated and combative about political beliefs. It's the process of runaway polarization, where any issue fractures on party lines once it passes an internet event horizon, that is new and frightening
Dropping a brick of heroin on every doorstop would probably have been less damaging than giving people an always-on device that communicates news about the world through the people who matter most to them. But we YOLO'ed our way into this world, and now have to YOLO our way out
Read 4 tweets
28 Jul
The Biden administration wants a billion dollars to begin to process Afghan citizens eligible for evacuation. This comes out to $50K per applicant, or about $40K more than airfare to the US along with a few grand to tide them over while finding a job. cnn.com/2021/07/26/pol…
Biden wants these Afghan heroes who helped us detained on military bases for reasons I still can't understand. The refusal to just grant them temporary resident status and welcome them into the United States is not just immoral and asinine, but is costing us money.
These special visa applicants are Afghans who speak English, understand America (kind of by definition) and are on track to become US citizens. At what point do we stop treating them like dangerous criminals, and let them settle with their families and send their kids to school?
Read 5 tweets
25 Jul
Banning cryptocurrencies is a foolish idea; all we need to do is regulate the exchanges.
If people insist their play money is real, then make them do time in the real-world pokey for breaking any of the rules that govern doing stuff with money. It's a similar strategy to making your kid pay rent and utilities if they insist they be treated like an adult.
Banning cryptocurrency would only reinforce the cult's belief system. We should take advantage of the fact that the technology is completely unworkable, and let it die a natural death. Regulating the exchanges will protect civilians while the fanatics get their wiggles out.
Read 7 tweets
23 Jul
Klobuchar's bill would make online companies liable for users who post misinformation about public health, in a year when public health authorities have done multiple U-turns on what is true. It would be a windfall for lawyers and serve no public interest. wsj.com/articles/bill-…
The bill would give the Department of Health and Human Services de facto censorship authority over social media, exposing anyone who defied HHS guidelines to predatory lawsuits. If such a law were proposed abroad, we'd correctly identify it as an attack on freedom of speech.
All you have to do is remember back to summer 2020, when systemic racism was asserted to be a public health problem commesurate with covid, to recognize how quickly such a mandate would expand in all political directions, changing with each election. This is how censorship works.
Read 4 tweets
18 Jul
The spyware scandal in the news today is a chance to reiterate that human beings are incapable of producing defect-free software at any scale. In particular, there is no such thing as a secure online system or a secure mobile platform. This foundational issue won't go away.
Our main line of defense against malicious software is that human ingenuity is also limited, so we only find a fraction of our errors. And the malefactors go on to make more mistakes coding the malware. Incompetence is the great defensive wall securing most of our infrastructure.
The phone situation in particular is dire, and I hope we see a future where these all-in-one devices are supplemented by simpler machines that do just one thing (make phone calls, send text messages) and can't be turned into a 24/7 surveillance beacon by hacking an emoji renderer
Read 10 tweets
18 Jul
The law he is presumably referring to is Section 230, which keeps owners of online forums from being liable for what participants post. This law allows small websites like mine to exist. Without it, we would only have the tech giants, who can afford massive legal departments.
If you or someone you love has been hurt in an online argument, and you want to bring the fun and excitement of US personal injury law to the world wide web, then Section 230 repeal is for you! You may be entitled to a cash settlement; call the number on the nearest billboard.
This view that misinformation is inflicted on an unwilling and innocent public is starting to grind my gears. The demand is driven by people hungry for more and more of it. Mark Zuckerberg is not responsible for the human condition, and linear algebra didn't radicalize your aunt
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(