Before I go out and get the donks up for work, some thoughts about American history.
Specifically, half slave and half free, the original Constitution, the Federation built from a Confederation.
2. This will not reach a conclusion. After 40+ years of pondering this, I myself still have not reached one.
3. Historically "state" and "nation" were more or less synonyms.
After the Revolutionary War, we did not become one nation by any stretch of anybody's imagination. We became, literally, 13 separate, loosely affiliated, free-ish countries, that is to say, free as in not colonies.
4. Some of the 13 separate nations had chattel slavery, primarily but not exclusively enslaving black people captured in Africa and sold into slavery.
Some of the 13 separate nations did not permit the owning and enslavement of human beings regardless of skin color or origin.
5. Overall the 13 newly independent nations did not get along for shit, and were not able to do much of anything as a group.
It is a historic fact that they were not even able to reach agreement to pay the back wages to the soldiers who had won their independence.
6. They had no authority of any sort over one another. Their sole "nationwide" "government" was a Congress, but that Congress had no power of taxation over the separate nations. Without taxes, they were unable to pay their joint debts, to other nations or to their own troops.
7. In fact, Congress did not even have the power to compel attendance. Whole states just blew the whole process off, didn't show up, didn't discuss, didn't vote.
It was a mess. One year, disgruntled combat veterans ran the whole Congress out of Philadelphia over back pay.
8. Congress demanded that the governor of Pennsylvania establish control over the veteran mob, and the governor told them (paraphrased) "So pay your fucking debts. Not my problem."
They had to leave town.
This is how we came to have DC, but I'm getting ahead of myself.
9. Anyway, one thing led to another, and the original conspiracy which had led the revolution (yes, Virginia, there is a Conspiracy) all got together and said, "This ain't working."
10. They gathered, again in Philly, starting in May of 1787. In the eleven years (almost) since the original Declaration of Independence, they had won their independence but had nothing approaching a resultant independent nation. Near anarchy. Some approved. Jefferson, for one.
11. They wrote up the current document. But they had a problem. They were half slave, half free. How to make of that, one nation?
The slave "states" (independent slaveholding nations, remember) weren't going to sign up to be ruled by a group which demanded they halt their economy
12. Slavery provided essentially the exact same economic support structure which fossil fuels provides today. Just like most people today have no moral misgivings about killing the global ecosystem because we make money doing it, those slave nations had no qualms about slavery.
13. Our cars, our air conditioners, our vacuum cleaners - all do for us what slaves did for them. And we like them. And they liked them.
So - well, you know. 3/5 of a person. An absolute guarantee that slavery couldn't be stopped for *at least* 20 years. Other compromises.
14. They wanted to create one nation, not two. They could see Europe. Every place where two nations sat side by side, war was inevitable and recurring. They didn't want to create the conditions for endless recurring wars.
15. So they set a level of buy-in, a minimum level of acceptance necessary to create "one nation" (which actually never was, quite. It was to be a federation of independent self-governing "states" or nations.)
That's why the Senate. Each independent nation-state had an equal say.
16. The level of buy-in they decided they would have to get was 9 of the 13.
9 to ratify, those 9 would become a federated nation.
I guess they figured if the other 4 made a competing nation, the big one could whip the little one in the inevitable wars, but I don't know.
17. Neither team, not the slave nations nor the non-slave nations, had 9 members. To create this federation they had to get some buy-in from each group.
To abolish slavery was to abolish the functioning economies of all the slave nations. Once again, like if we outlawed fossil 🔥
18. So they made the choices they made. And everybody knows what came after. The Civil War was as inevitable as sunrise, and came, and was ugly, and the economies of the slave states collapsed, and sharecropping and Jim Crow and all the crap, and 1965, and 2021.
19. And I have tried to figure out, for much of my adult life, how they could have done it better. And I don't know.
If they had formed two competing nations - probably the most likely other outcome - would we, like Europe, have finally made peace, mostly? I don't know.
20. It's pretty obvious that under the two nation scenario, the free nation would have always been a magnet for slaves escaping the slave nation. It appears obvious to me that that one running sore, by itself, would have led to wars.
22. I don't see any circumstances under which they could have written a Constitution which banned slavery outright and gotten 9 of these squabbling independent nations to sign on. I mean, look at what happened ~75 years later when they tried.
23. To me the original stumbling block was laid hundreds of years earlier, when white settlers grabbed more land than they could work or manage with their own strength and the strength of their animal partners. Slavery became "necessary."
Just like cars, trucks, tractors. Today.
24. We know our economies are killing the whole world we live on. We know the collapse is close. We won't give up our mechanical slaves because we'd have to figure out a way to provide for ourselves, and we don't wanna.
So - what about 1787?
25. I can't see any road out of where they were the very day the British surrendered, to get to one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
We're still not there. I don't know if it would have been possible.
I don't know if it is yet.
That's all.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff McFadden

Jeff McFadden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @homemadeguitars

30 Jul
You can do all this with a four wheeler, but you can't hear the birds sing, y'know?
But they're quicker.
I'm not in a hurry.
Hitching them up took a couple minutes all told. Harnessing them takes longer. I don't have a current video.
This was a couple days ago. About 92° I think.
Those are beet pulp pellets they get, out of my cargo pocket & into their mouths. Animal feed, easy to handle. Output stream product of beet sugar production.
Read 9 tweets
30 Jul
Peter replied to a thread I wrote yesterday. I say speed, Peter says energy.
They are two words for the same thing.
I am going to attempt to explain why I think focus on speed, particularly, as the visible expression of excess energy, and why speed offers the proper action point.
2. In the first place, I believe, and I think Peter does too, that we must intentionally, continually decrease our energy use as the only realistic means of reducing emissions. I do not believe that building so-called "renewable energy" installations can or will ever do this.
3. I explain my reasoning on the above statement elsewhere and am not going to address it here. That statement is today's starting point.
Energy causes action. Lacking an application of energy, nothing ever moves. This is the simplest physics.
Read 42 tweets
29 Jul
I didn't take any video today. I had hard dangerous work to do, I had to do it with donkeys, a cart, and a pitchfork, out in the sun.
The reason it was dangerous is because
2. I had pretty much set myself up for this on purpose, with my eyes wide open.
To live like I live requires commitment. But I believe it to be possible, climate change and all, old age and all, within certain limits.
I bought hay this year. 200 square bales. That's not a year's
3. worth of hay for 3 standard donkeys on dry lot, or just barely.
I bought it, delivered and stacked inside my barn, from an honorable hay professional. Cost me $1075.00
I spend more than that on mower and tractor gas every year.
And now I'm safe. I do all I can, it's enough.
Read 21 tweets
29 Jul
I invite my readers to read this article, with recommendations from some of the world's leading "climate thinkers."
In this thread I am going to specifically address their recommendations, via screenshot.
As a non-leading, totally unrespected, thinker. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2. First, Peter Kalmus, @ClimateHuman. We follow each other. Here's all I could capture in one screenshot.
3. Taking just one clip from Peter...
Fossil Fuel must be capped and rationed. Fossil Fuel infrastructure must no longer be built.
Fossil fuels power 100% of all renewable energy infrastructure construction. If we choose to increase renewable construction we must increase fossil.
Read 26 tweets
29 Jul
The author of this article appears to believe that the things she demands can be built and installed without any increase in current fossil fuel generating capacity and emissions to do the work.
I'd like to see that explained. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
2. We, as a nation, barely have enough generating capacity to serve the current demand.
This is why in various regions there are requests from electric utilities that users reduce their "peak" demand. Set the thermostat warmer to reduce A/C demand.
3. If 90% of new cars sold are electric, demand on fossil fuel generating facilities will increase.
If we launch a "Manhattan Project" scale, wind and solar powered, nationwide generating infrastructure, that construction will be powered by current technology.
It's what we have.
Read 6 tweets
29 Jul
It is obvious that I view climate, the ecosystem, and humanity's options drastically differently from almost everyone else in the English speaking developed "climate aware" world.
"People won't..."
Yeah, about that.
What you're telling me is that, if someone went around all the
2. parking lots where the car-housed live, and said, "Here, if you want, I'll set you up with a tiny house, five acres, a donkey, and supervision to heal that land and sequester carbon, and enough money to live on," there wouldn't be any takers?
Is that what you mean by
3. "People won't"?
Or do you mean, "The people winning the high energy economy like it this way?"
Yeah, I know they do. They tell me so all the time.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(