🧵Whether or not you think the "performance review" of Fulton Elections is merited, here's why it is doomed. Only damage will result. I''ll list some reasons A to H on this thread.

A. It's politically driven, not an attempt at getting answers. SOS controls review staff.
2/ B. SEB is to appoint a "Performance Review Bd." ("PRB") in 30 days. First, the GA Senators must correct their request for Fulton review. They requested to review staff, (not permitted by law).
Do they have guts to review GOP members of Fulton Bd? (Only choice permitted.)
3/ PRB can't review staff. Can only review full board. ENTIRE board must be fired en masse if SEB wants to replace management.

C. PRB will be unwieldy. Likely to be 11 members! 2 "local election officials" are appointed. An "official" is full board, not an individual.
4/ Those 2 "officials" will be bi-partisan boards from other counties, or probate judges from small counties with no idea how big county elections work.

Given the partisan nature of the review, political sides will be drawn from the beginning.

1 member will be SOS staffer.
5/ Partisans will influence those 11 PRB members from other county boards. They are generally appointed by the two major county parties.
They will advocate for their parties' interests, not for the ground truth or improvement.
6/ D. The outcome is predetermined.
SOS staffer will control information.
5 D's will say that Fulton is doing fine in tough conditions, and 5 R's will say Fulton Bd is inept and must be replaced. The PRB vote will be split, but SOS staffer will have deciding vote for report
7/ No surprise-- Raffensperger will have his staffer recommend a take over of Fulton.

E. The information gleaned from Fulton will be whatever SOS wants as he controls the staffer and no one else will be empowered to play the information control game.
8/ Avg PRB member would have no idea how to ask for the actual information needed for an objective review.

The SOS will cherrypick the info to place blame on Fulton for his terrible system and flawed "audit."
9/
F. No one will get the answers they want and deserve. But massive money and time will be spent with escalating tensions and no improvement.

SOS gets to pound his chest to enhance his 2022 primary chances.
10.
G. Fundamental voting system flaws will be swept under the rug by SOS in the process, focusing all the attention on "Bad Fulton," rather than the dangerous voting system.

Both parties will be happy that core voting system flaws are being ignored at Fulton's expense.
11/ H.
A muddled contentious report from the big PRB will cause more strife, and force the SEB to make a decision on taking over the Fulton Elec. Bd.

Partisan politics will drive the SEB decision, no doubt, while no one is working on real improvements.
12/ There ARE simple straightforward non-partisan solutions.
Stay tuned for a recommendation we are working on to send to decision-makers.
Check back here.
And in the mean time, please help us!
bit.ly/CGGDonate

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marilyn Marks

Marilyn Marks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarilynRMarks1

29 Jul
Wait a minute!
The lawmakers have no legal right to call for a SB202 performance review of Rick Barron. He is management staff, NOT a board member.
The lawmakers can only seek a performance review of the entire board. This is very much out of bounds going after management!! 1/
2/If anyone wondered whether the lawmakers would overreach in their efforts to intervene in county elections, this is all the proof you need.
Look at what they wrote in the letter, misquoting the law.
The law permits the review of the Fulton Board, not an individual employee.
3/ Whether or not you are a Rick Barron fan, one needs to realize that his employment is a decision to be made by the COUNTY board, NOT by state officials' overreach.

This is really alarming!

We @CoalitionGoodGv will have much more to say about this.
Read 6 tweets
18 Jul
1/ Consider the value of transparency of election records being proven in real time!
The wildly irresponsible claims of @VoterGa and @GAballots about Fulton ballot counts, falsely claiming thousands of double counted votes and fraud are being debunked by ordinary citizens...
2/ These citizens seem to be individuals working alone and analyzing the images of the ballots against the wild claims of the @voterga folks. Transparency is a wonder drug!!
We @CoalitionGoodGv and @ajc have both published hundreds of thousands of Fulton images, like this.
3/ Why is it possible? Thank @sheaforgeorgia (D) and Rep. Shaw Blackmon (R) for a bipartisan effort to make ballot images public records that passed in March.
Now anyone can review the images.
And generous donors to @CoalitionGoodGv funded the purchase of images from Fulton.
Read 5 tweets
17 Jul
The problems with @GaSecofState' audit were inevitable from day it was announced.
We @CoalitionGoodGv sent this letter to the press and county election officials on Nov. 12 raising some of the very issues that have invited so much misinformation.
➡️ conta.cc/3kp4ygK
1/
2/ The SOS issued a LOT of false statements, misinformation, nonsensical directions to the counties, and imposed an impossible deadline given the working conditions.
He insisted that they use a software program that was not designed for this scale of "audit," assuring failure.
3/ Ask any of the many data entry workers who had to deal with an electronic audit worksheet where they could not see what data they were entering, or checking it for accuracy.
Monitors were not permitted to check accuracy of anything.
Transparency failure!
Read 4 tweets
16 Jul
1 So @TuckerCarlson and @GAballots are breaking GA's new absurd unconstitutional SB202 law when they take these photographs and videos of voted ballots.

Although I disagree with most of their claims, I'll fight for their ability to show us the evidence!

SB202 outlawed this. ⬇️
2/ Why did @GaSecofState insist on making it illegal to show pictures of ballots, and pushed that in SB202?
We have sued to have this language declared unconstitutional. We call it the "Photography Ban."
3/ And if a reporter or poll watcher saw these ballots being scanned twice, it is now, thanks to @GaSecofState' language in SB202, a crime for anyone to report it to the public or law enforcement!
We are suing to block this "gag rule."
Read 5 tweets
16 Jul
We @CoalitionGoodGv have not had a lot to say (yet!) about the @VoterGa claims of thousands of inaccurately counted ballots in Fulton. We believe there are definitely some inexcusable errors, but the claims appear to be wildly exaggerated as to impacts on official results. 1/
2/ We have confirmed that two batches of 100 ballots were scanned twice, and they were likely counted twice but we are still confirming whether the duplicate scanned votes recorded as official.

But don't let @GaSecofState off the hook on this.
He certified the tallies.
3/ SOS had audit tallies long before he let Fulton officials see them. He claimed that everything balanced, (it didn't). He ordered a machine recount with ridiculous processes, and of course got a sloppy result. (Not just from Fulton).

SOS knew the numbers first,-buried them
Read 4 tweets
16 Jul
1/ Hey, @GAballots and @VoterGa, where does this 4,255 "extra votes" allegation come from?
I assume that it is NOT that 4K votes were added to any official totals, right?
Note below that hand count tally is 634 more than original.
2/ We agree that there are 2 batches (so far) that were scanned twice and appear (?) to be counted twice. We are still confirming the vote count impact.
Are there more than 2 batches scanned twice?
How are you confirming that they were counted twice?
3/ And no one should let @GabrielSterling and @GaSecofState off the hook here. They had audit numbers and recount numbers before officials at Fulton had them. They said that all the numbers "checked out" and certified them.

Buck stops at SOS office!!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(