Thread 1/ This is a thread on the hashtag 'Tunisia is safe', which has been trending in #Tunisia for the past two days or so, and was the top trend for some time. This thread highlights the contents of the hashtag, its influencers, its seeming purpose, and any potential anomalies
2/ The sample includes about around 7000 interactions involving around 3500 unique accounts (this number also includes accounts that did not tweet the term, but were mentioned or replied to) Sample ranges from 7pm 28th July to 6am 31st July. #Tunisia
3/ First, who was tweeting and who was the composition. The most influentional and retweeted account was popular Tunisian influencer Louay Cherni. Also influential and heavily RT's was Tunisian model and actress Azza Slimene. Cherni's tweet criticizing Ennahda was the most
4/ retweeted on the hashtag. Slimene's tweet expressing cautious but guarded optimism was the second most retweeted. A thematic analysis of all the tweets on the hashtag reveal that the predominant message was anti-Ennahda and anti-Islamism. 37% of interactions were tweets/RTs
5/ either criticizing Ennahda, Islamism or the Muslim Brotherhood. The most extreme forms of criticism was labelling Ennahda terrorists. Around 27% are tweets defending Kais. Around 6% express dismissal of narratives that don't support Kais or call the crisis a coup #Tunisia
6/ It is quite clear then that the hashtag predominantly focuses on adversarial narratives re Ennahdha, positioning them as the chief cause of the problem, and the main propagator of lies around events unfolding in #Tunisia. An interesting aspect of the campaign is the concerted
7/ effort to spread these messages and to 'explain' Tunisia to international news outlets & commentators. A striking aspect of the network is the no. of 'replies' versus retweets. While RTs make up the most content, there are a high number of replies. Why is this interesting?
8/ If you look at the graph there are two clear areas, green versus purple. Purple is retweets, while green represents replies with the hashtag 'tunisia is safe' - mostly to news channels and others. These include channels predominantly seen as critical of the selfcoup, including
9/ Al Jazeera Arabic, AlArabyTV, but also anyone potentially critical of Kais' actions, such as @IlhanMN - and Ennahda members @radwan_masmoudi . This high reply volume demonstrates a fairly clear attempt to try and shape the narrative around unfolding events in #Tunisia
10/ That's not necessarily surprising given the charged narrative around events. A potentially odd aspect of the trend which can be interpreted in two ways is also the volume of new accounts on the hashtag. 503 new accounts have been created in 3 days (28,29,30th July). This
11/ Compare this with the average number of accounts created per month on the sample, which is only 29. Such anomalies usually mean one of two things. First, extraordinary events drive people to Twitter to take part in the conversation or spread their opinions
12/ The alternative is manipulation, where new accounts are generated en masse by some entity to try and shape a narrative. It can also be a combination of both of those things, although it is hard to determine with great precision which is which in such cases.
13/ SOme may have noticed a similar spike in May. In 8 days 415 new accounts were created - most of these seem to have been set up to tweet about what was happening in Sheikh Jarrah in Palestine. Again, the same logic applies. A potentially interesting aspect too is that
14/ you don't see the same dramatic account creation in 2010/11, when the Jasmine Revolution really began. This can mean that at the time less people joined Twitter around that time (although that's likely not true). It could demonstrate that those who signed up in 10/11 did not
15/ engage to the same level on the tunisia is safe hashtag - for whatever reason (age, abandonment of Twitter account etc). Many of the new accounts after being set up see to reply directly to other accounts with the tunisia is safe hashtag - and don't do much else after sending
16/ that tweet. In sum, the contents of the thread emphasise support for KS and also single out attacking Ennahda. It's not a hashtag encouraging debate or conversation (hey this is Twitter!), but one propagating a specific message. - So that's it for now - some caveats
1) For those less familiar with soc-media analysis - it is not a public opinion poll 2) It is generally descriptive 3) FB is not relevant to this thread 4) It is not a comment on who supports whom and how many support KS's actions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Another key aspect of this campaign was the part targeting #Lebanon. The accounts below are all linked to the campaign. All of them attempt to interfere in Lebanese politics by riling up sectarian sentiment, diverting blame away from Israel and focusing on Iran and Hezbollah
2/ These groups, with names like "No to the Iranian Occupation", "Shia Against War", and "the war of 2006 is remembered and will not be repeated" position themselves as groups representing real people. They all use similar TTPs & identical branding strategies. All have been
3/ suspended from Facebook but not Twitter, and many have run ads. Shia Against War, for example, paid to advertise content from the Tahoror movement (see right). However Tahoror denied any involvement with the group.
1/ 📝Excited to announce the release of "The Qatar Plot," authored by myself & @SohanDsouza. This investigation (covered in @afp today) reveals a massive influence op targeting Qatar & Muslims, including in the US, UK and EU - ahead of European Elections sites.google.com/view/theqatarp…
2/ 🚨 Our findings uncover a vast network spreading xenophobic, anti-Muslim, anti-immigration, and anti-Qatar disinformation. The operation spanned platforms like Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, and TikTok. To a lesser extent, the op also target Iran🌐 #Disinfo #Islamophobia
3/ 🇫🇷🇬🇧🇺🇸 Targeted countries include France, the UK, the USA, Germany, Spain, Sweden Saudi,and more. This network reached millions, manipulating ,public sentiment with at least 41 million reached on Facebook alone (and this is a conservative estimate). 📈 #QatarPlotReport
🧵1/ There is some confusion going on around the strike in Rafah. This is largely due to awful IDF instructions. In a video on 22nd May IDF spokesman @AvichayAdraee told people that Zones 2371, 2373, 2360 were safe. I have highlighted this below.
2/ The source of the confusion lies in the fact that the image of the highlighted map in @AvichayAdraee's video DOES NOT match the text. The image initially does not include zones 2371, 2373, 2360 yet the text explicitly states they are safe.
3/ However the location of the strike has been reported to be both 2371 and 2372. Existing geolocation by @m_osint and Al Jazeera suggests it was in 2372, not 2371. Zone 2372 was not explicitly mentioned by the IDF. However...
1) Telegraph subtly trying to align pro-Palestinian voices with Chinese and Russian disinformation. No actual evidence is provided here of Chinese and Russian interference, simply a note that some pro-Palestinian accounts have fake followers.
2) (It should be noted that you can't control who follows you). From my point of view there are a LOT of fake accounts on X promoting various points of view. However, there is more evidence for Israel using fake accounts on FB, Insta and X to smear UNRWA aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/19…
3) Interestingly, the network that was focusing on attacking UNRWA, is also focusing on blaming the Chinese/Russian/Iranian 'axis of evil'. While it's plausible China and Russia are trying to influence narratives, the narrative that China and Russia are the only ones operating
🧵1/ Israel are attempting to muddy the waters around the killing of an international UN worker in a clearly marked vehicle. They have released a video claiming that "terrorists" are roaming and shooting at a UNRWA compound. There's no evidence that indicates they are
2/ terrorists. The video shows armed men mingling with what are probably UN workers. There is no sense of coercion or animosity in those shots. Crucially, there is no caveat that these people might not be factions or Hamas police protecting aid convoys.
3/ The US has even asked Israel to stop targeting Hamas police officers trying to protect aid. Naturally the video provides no context, and remember the IDF are an organisation that recently murdered multiple aid workers in clearly marked vehicles.
🧵1/ I am somewhat dismayed (though sadly unsurprised) by this extremely disingenuous and callous reporting about Palestinian death figures. Claims that the UN have revised down its death toll are absolutely untrue but have been repeated by right wing outlets but also the CFR 🤔
2/ These media are focusing on these two infographics by the @ochaopt . The one on the left, published 6th May, the one on the right published 8th May. As you can see, total fatalities INCREASE, as opposed to decrease. What the propaganda is seaking to do is barely sophistry
3/All that's happening is the OCHA has added figures for the dead that have been identified. It quite clearly says that the breakdown DOES NOT include 10000 missing or buried under rubble.