Thread 1/ This is a thread on the hashtag 'Tunisia is safe', which has been trending in #Tunisia for the past two days or so, and was the top trend for some time. This thread highlights the contents of the hashtag, its influencers, its seeming purpose, and any potential anomalies
2/ The sample includes about around 7000 interactions involving around 3500 unique accounts (this number also includes accounts that did not tweet the term, but were mentioned or replied to) Sample ranges from 7pm 28th July to 6am 31st July. #Tunisia
3/ First, who was tweeting and who was the composition. The most influentional and retweeted account was popular Tunisian influencer Louay Cherni. Also influential and heavily RT's was Tunisian model and actress Azza Slimene. Cherni's tweet criticizing Ennahda was the most
4/ retweeted on the hashtag. Slimene's tweet expressing cautious but guarded optimism was the second most retweeted. A thematic analysis of all the tweets on the hashtag reveal that the predominant message was anti-Ennahda and anti-Islamism. 37% of interactions were tweets/RTs
5/ either criticizing Ennahda, Islamism or the Muslim Brotherhood. The most extreme forms of criticism was labelling Ennahda terrorists. Around 27% are tweets defending Kais. Around 6% express dismissal of narratives that don't support Kais or call the crisis a coup #Tunisia
6/ It is quite clear then that the hashtag predominantly focuses on adversarial narratives re Ennahdha, positioning them as the chief cause of the problem, and the main propagator of lies around events unfolding in #Tunisia. An interesting aspect of the campaign is the concerted
7/ effort to spread these messages and to 'explain' Tunisia to international news outlets & commentators. A striking aspect of the network is the no. of 'replies' versus retweets. While RTs make up the most content, there are a high number of replies. Why is this interesting?
8/ If you look at the graph there are two clear areas, green versus purple. Purple is retweets, while green represents replies with the hashtag 'tunisia is safe' - mostly to news channels and others. These include channels predominantly seen as critical of the selfcoup, including
9/ Al Jazeera Arabic, AlArabyTV, but also anyone potentially critical of Kais' actions, such as @IlhanMN - and Ennahda members @radwan_masmoudi . This high reply volume demonstrates a fairly clear attempt to try and shape the narrative around unfolding events in #Tunisia
10/ That's not necessarily surprising given the charged narrative around events. A potentially odd aspect of the trend which can be interpreted in two ways is also the volume of new accounts on the hashtag. 503 new accounts have been created in 3 days (28,29,30th July). This
11/ Compare this with the average number of accounts created per month on the sample, which is only 29. Such anomalies usually mean one of two things. First, extraordinary events drive people to Twitter to take part in the conversation or spread their opinions
12/ The alternative is manipulation, where new accounts are generated en masse by some entity to try and shape a narrative. It can also be a combination of both of those things, although it is hard to determine with great precision which is which in such cases.
13/ SOme may have noticed a similar spike in May. In 8 days 415 new accounts were created - most of these seem to have been set up to tweet about what was happening in Sheikh Jarrah in Palestine. Again, the same logic applies. A potentially interesting aspect too is that
14/ you don't see the same dramatic account creation in 2010/11, when the Jasmine Revolution really began. This can mean that at the time less people joined Twitter around that time (although that's likely not true). It could demonstrate that those who signed up in 10/11 did not
15/ engage to the same level on the tunisia is safe hashtag - for whatever reason (age, abandonment of Twitter account etc). Many of the new accounts after being set up see to reply directly to other accounts with the tunisia is safe hashtag - and don't do much else after sending
16/ that tweet. In sum, the contents of the thread emphasise support for KS and also single out attacking Ennahda. It's not a hashtag encouraging debate or conversation (hey this is Twitter!), but one propagating a specific message. - So that's it for now - some caveats
1) For those less familiar with soc-media analysis - it is not a public opinion poll 2) It is generally descriptive 3) FB is not relevant to this thread 4) It is not a comment on who supports whom and how many support KS's actions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection
73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.
Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week