Thread 1/ This is a thread on the hashtag 'Tunisia is safe', which has been trending in #Tunisia for the past two days or so, and was the top trend for some time. This thread highlights the contents of the hashtag, its influencers, its seeming purpose, and any potential anomalies
2/ The sample includes about around 7000 interactions involving around 3500 unique accounts (this number also includes accounts that did not tweet the term, but were mentioned or replied to) Sample ranges from 7pm 28th July to 6am 31st July. #Tunisia
3/ First, who was tweeting and who was the composition. The most influentional and retweeted account was popular Tunisian influencer Louay Cherni. Also influential and heavily RT's was Tunisian model and actress Azza Slimene. Cherni's tweet criticizing Ennahda was the most
4/ retweeted on the hashtag. Slimene's tweet expressing cautious but guarded optimism was the second most retweeted. A thematic analysis of all the tweets on the hashtag reveal that the predominant message was anti-Ennahda and anti-Islamism. 37% of interactions were tweets/RTs
5/ either criticizing Ennahda, Islamism or the Muslim Brotherhood. The most extreme forms of criticism was labelling Ennahda terrorists. Around 27% are tweets defending Kais. Around 6% express dismissal of narratives that don't support Kais or call the crisis a coup #Tunisia
6/ It is quite clear then that the hashtag predominantly focuses on adversarial narratives re Ennahdha, positioning them as the chief cause of the problem, and the main propagator of lies around events unfolding in #Tunisia. An interesting aspect of the campaign is the concerted
7/ effort to spread these messages and to 'explain' Tunisia to international news outlets & commentators. A striking aspect of the network is the no. of 'replies' versus retweets. While RTs make up the most content, there are a high number of replies. Why is this interesting?
8/ If you look at the graph there are two clear areas, green versus purple. Purple is retweets, while green represents replies with the hashtag 'tunisia is safe' - mostly to news channels and others. These include channels predominantly seen as critical of the selfcoup, including
9/ Al Jazeera Arabic, AlArabyTV, but also anyone potentially critical of Kais' actions, such as @IlhanMN - and Ennahda members @radwan_masmoudi . This high reply volume demonstrates a fairly clear attempt to try and shape the narrative around unfolding events in #Tunisia
10/ That's not necessarily surprising given the charged narrative around events. A potentially odd aspect of the trend which can be interpreted in two ways is also the volume of new accounts on the hashtag. 503 new accounts have been created in 3 days (28,29,30th July). This
11/ Compare this with the average number of accounts created per month on the sample, which is only 29. Such anomalies usually mean one of two things. First, extraordinary events drive people to Twitter to take part in the conversation or spread their opinions
12/ The alternative is manipulation, where new accounts are generated en masse by some entity to try and shape a narrative. It can also be a combination of both of those things, although it is hard to determine with great precision which is which in such cases.
13/ SOme may have noticed a similar spike in May. In 8 days 415 new accounts were created - most of these seem to have been set up to tweet about what was happening in Sheikh Jarrah in Palestine. Again, the same logic applies. A potentially interesting aspect too is that
14/ you don't see the same dramatic account creation in 2010/11, when the Jasmine Revolution really began. This can mean that at the time less people joined Twitter around that time (although that's likely not true). It could demonstrate that those who signed up in 10/11 did not
15/ engage to the same level on the tunisia is safe hashtag - for whatever reason (age, abandonment of Twitter account etc). Many of the new accounts after being set up see to reply directly to other accounts with the tunisia is safe hashtag - and don't do much else after sending
16/ that tweet. In sum, the contents of the thread emphasise support for KS and also single out attacking Ennahda. It's not a hashtag encouraging debate or conversation (hey this is Twitter!), but one propagating a specific message. - So that's it for now - some caveats
1) For those less familiar with soc-media analysis - it is not a public opinion poll 2) It is generally descriptive 3) FB is not relevant to this thread 4) It is not a comment on who supports whom and how many support KS's actions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The earliest public post I could find for that fake quote about Hamas celebrating the Bondi Beach attacks (yes - the same fake quotes shared by @BillAckman @TRobinsonNewEra @EYakoby @WarMonitor3) appears to be @HenMazzig, but he deleted it. The second was an Indian pharmacist...
🧵1/ Quite expected how the Israeli press and Hasbara are trying to convince the world @FranceskAlbs was removed from Georgetown's affiliated faculty due to her antisemitism.
Actually, she was removed because she has been sanctioned by the US government
2/ As Maria Mayda, director of Georgetown University's ISIM said, '“U.S. institutions are prohibited by federal law from affiliating with individuals subject to U.S. sanctions,” she said.
3/ Furthermore, Albanese was sanctioned due to her 'engaging' with the ICC, pursuant to Trump's sanctions on the ICC - not antisemitsm. Antisemitism is mentioned, as is criticism of Israel and 'the west'. But as you can see, this is just ad hominem state.gov/releases/offic…
It's finally here! Remember that weird group of Emirati influencers you keep seeing online. Well I've done a VERY deep dive, & the story is even weirder than you can imagine!
2/ Until late 2024, most people had never heard of this group of Emirati influencers, including the somewhat infamous Rauda AlTenaiji. Then they appeared everywhere: op-eds, podcasts, think tanks, conferences. This piece maps how that visibility was built.
3/ This open source investigation documents a pattern of manufactured influence: coordinated account creation, shared studios, pseudo-news sites, AI-assisted content, and systematic amplification across platforms.
In the past week, hashtags linked to Southern #Yemen have surged on X notably:
القوات الجنوبيه طارده_للارهاب (“Southern forces are expelling terrorism”).
👉TLDR: over 5000 X bots are promoting promoting STC control of southern Yemen
2/ First, context: Saudi Arabia has mobilised up to 20,000 fighters on Yemen’s borders after the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) made significant territorial advances in Hadhramaut and Mahra theguardian.com/world/2025/dec…
3/ The STC is using these gains to push for a return to two states, arguing that an independent South would act as a bulwark against terrorism and protect Red Sea shipping routes. Much of the international community continue to emphasise Yemen’s territorial unity.
On 13/08, a fake quote attributed to Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya circulated on X:
“The countdown to the next massacre has begun. Next time we will slaughter all the Jews"
It was debunked, but Gemini later stated it as fact >
2/ Firstly, this super sus account was the first I could find spreading the rumour on X (7.49 am UK time 13/08). @RonanMark572778 - whoever this 'pilot and physician' is has sent >113k tweets since July 2023. He also has a verified account (rememeber verification = algo boost).
3/ The narrative then was picked up on X by other accounts and influencers, changing ever so slightly. Accounts like @FleurHassanN @thevoicetruth1 (lol) got a lot of engagement and 'legitimised' the rumour.
NOTE: Not one of these accounts is providing a source to the quote.
🧵🚨1/ This verified X account posing as an American doctor has been spreading pro-Israel propaganda, justifying the killing of journalists, and posting predominantly anti–Sudanese Armed Forces content. The account is fake.>
#disinformation #gazagenocide #Sudan
2/ The first clear red flags are the tweets versus creation date ratio.
The account was created in 2009, but has only tweeted 1090 times, and the first of those was on April 2025. This means the account has been appropriated/hacked/bought and its old tweets scrubbed.
3/ I located the unique user id of the account. I ran this user id via the botometer archive of bots and it tells me that in February 2023 the account was called 'sitaramks', not 'nate_jone'