People have been tricked into destroying the natural systems that sustain us, and which are essential for their children to survive in the future, just to make a lot of profit for very rich people benefiting from this unsustainable over-exploitation of the natural world.
However, the idea that this marvellous civilization we have created, is in fact a gigantic intergenerational scam, and that our leaders, both political and business, are not in fact our friends, but con-artists exploiting us, seems too preposterous to contemplate.
However, if our leaders were really our protectors, protecting the public interest, they would have reacted to the climate and ecological crisis, by saying we made a huge error going down this path, we must change direction.
In fact, this was what the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm, actually concluded. That we must urgently change direction, to stop us destroying the natural systems that sustain us. un.org/en/conferences…
Yet, despite our leaders promising to address this climate and ecological crisis of the unsustainable exploitation, every government in the world has just continued to pursue business as usual, despite the fact this was taking us towards global suicide. un.org/press/en/2011/…
Therefore, who do our leaders represent? Do they represent the public, the people who will ultimately suffer, or do they primarily represent the vested interests who are profiting the most from this over-exploitation of the natural systems that sustain us?
If our leaders really represented the people as they claim to, they would act to protect the people against the vested interests and reckless people driving us towards global suicide, because of their greed for more wealth.
Yet, self-evidently they are not doing this. Governments still pay massive subsidies to fossil fuel companies. Whilst at the same time they criminalize peaceful protest, in which good people simply try to alert the public to what is happening. forbes.com/sites/davidcar…
So yes, I know it sounds outlandish that this modern civilization we have created is actually based on a great big scam. However, this is what the objective evidence says.
Watching billionaires, the richest men on Earth, taking joyrides into space, whilst we are experiencing global extreme weather events, caused by the climate crisis, driven by the greed of these people, should really alert us to what is happening.
When we see people who are facilitating this global suicide pact described as "moderate" or portrayed as possible climate saviours as Bill Gates recently was, and those trying to warn us about what is happening, labelled as "extremists", we should know we are being conned.
It is not about good and evil. It is that greed destroys the judgement of these people who claim to be our leaders and to represent our interests. They are simply not looking at the consequences. But this makes them not fit to lead.
Let me clarify what I am saying. I am saying that the judgement of those leading us towards this crisis has been rotted by their greed. These are ultimately stupid people, making stupid decisions.
All I am asking people to do is to become alert to the fact that those steering the ship of our civilization, are not competent leaders. Too much power, wealth, high status and greed destroys the judgement of people.
It's incumbent on anyone not caught up in this group delusion to sound the alarm.
I think these people are simply power and wealth addicts. They have convinced themselves of just a bit more, and then they will take action. But this is the thing, they have not taken action and they have let it all get out of control. They are helpless addicts, not good leaders.
Thanks to the @Guardian for publishing this and I agree with @MichaelEMann@ClimateHuman et al. When I studied climate science as part of my ecology degree, nearly 30 years ago, it seemed obvious to me we had to act on the climate immediately. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I could never work out this rationale of putting off taking action on the climate and ecological crisis until some far off point into the future. The science was certain about the nature of the problem we faced, and putting off action was purely procrastination.
The only uncertainties with the climate crisis were in what time frame it would impact us, and the severity. Likewise with the ecological/biodiversity crisis. However, there was no doubt these crises existed and would become more severe as time went on.
1) We need to urgently develop a new simple and clear cut way of defining the climate and ecological crisis, and defining what measures are actually necessary to avert catastrophe. I make this request to all working scientists in this field, and indeed all concerned scientists.
2) Currently we have a serious problem where world leaders are playing a deceitful game of pretending they are trying address the climate and ecological crisis, when neither their acknowledgement of what the crisis is, and nor their measures are at all realistic #MindTheGap.
3) This is a convoluted version of the straw man logical fallacy, in which a dishonest person tries to win an argument, by misrepresenting the argument of their opponent and arguing against the misrepresentation as if that were the issue. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Let me address this in full, in the context of my tweet thread. Essentially I was saying that if governments, vested interests, billionaires started treating the climate and ecological crisis as the crisis it is, then so would everyone else.
People, meaning the public at large, take their cues from their leadership. The only means people have about knowing about the wider world and events in it, are via a media controlled by the same powerful and wealthy cabal, profiting from the carbon economy etc.
We live in a very unequal world. Where if Bill Gates wants to tell us his personal views about the climate crisis, it is splashed across the front pages of the media for several weeks, and forced down our throats.
I cannot over-emphasise this point, and I cannot thank @GretaThunberg enough for highlighting this. Although I think there is a general failure to acknowledge just how profound her points are.
The scale of the climate and ecological emergency is so massive, and the scale of change necessary to address it so massive, that governments are terrified of the public backlash and demand for action, that would follow if they acknowledged it as the crisis it is.
This is their own fault (that of governments). They should have been taking urgent action decades ago. However, as I say, once they do, total system change is inevitable. This dam of inaction, is increasing the surge that will follow, once the crisis is properly recognised.
1) What if our system of governance was not what it seems? That in fact our leaders were in fact confidence tricksters ruthlessly exploiting the public for their own ends, and the benefit of others in their cabal. That it was an intergenerational scam? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidenc…
2) I have played with this idea for decades. At first it seems a preposterous proposition. That I am quite mad for even contemplating it. But bear with me.
3) Let's go with the Wikipedia description.
"A confidence trick is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using their credulity, naïveté, compassion, vanity, irresponsibility, and greed. ..."
2) This morning I remembered to take my fold up sweep net to confirm what I was seeing flying around were in fact Manchester Treble-bar (Carsia sororiata). This is because at this time they are flying endlessly and only occasionally settle.
3) I caught in excess of 15, and all those I thought looked liked Manchester Treble-bars, were indeed this species.