I just learned a surprising thing that was not obvious to me. Good writing is like good visualization. Good writing pays attention to good geometry.
It's obvious to a good programmer how to structure their code for easier comprehension. They've developed style guides and in the industrial application of programming, collective consistency is critically important. Scalable software engineering requires efficient communication.
But we take this for granted in natural language. We are so accustomed to the interpretation of natural language that we forget to sculpt our words in a manner that is easily understood.
Before style guides came around for computer programming, we learned our own ways of structuring our code. This is perhaps how most people learn how to write well. They just learn from experimentation.
Two decades ago, programming adapted the ideas of the architect Christopher Alexander to describe even more complex patterns that were found to recur in the construction of code.
Just as Alexander had observed that there were good practices in designing architecture, there were also good practices in constructing code. So, therefore, there should be good design patterns for writing.
I am not from the liberal arts, so I'm unfamiliar if there are design patterns for writing. Has anyone encountered them? Please respond if you have seen them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Noun-centric thinking is making it difficult to explain and understand the dynamics of covid19. People seem to not understand that everything is a process.
Knowledge discovery is a process. Covid19 is novel because it is a new virus and its characteristics are unknown without further investigations. Of course, one has to balance the time required for information and the need to act swiftly.
Science is a knowledge discovery process. It is not a label you slap on to something that remains unchanging for all time. Yes, we do these for food items up to an expiration date. But after the expiration date, all labels attached to the food item aren't expected to hold.
There's a morbid reason why red states are encouraging the spread of covid. They are angry because they lost the election (see polls). In retaliation they want people to suffer.
This mirrors the draining of the public pools. Many places in the USA favored draining and closing down their public pools over the possibility of races mixing together and enjoying the benefits of the pool. amazon.com/Sum-Us-Everyon…
Many are willing to suffer just as long as the people they hate also suffer with them. It's an ugly mindset, but it's surprisingly true of many policies in many states in America.
Hopium is a pathetic survival strategy. Anti-vaxxers are praying that the Delta variant is less dangerous than previous variants without having numbers to back up the belief. Indeed, the UK death rate is low, but 90% of the population has at least 1 jab.
Here's the death data coming out of Russia. 23% have been vaccinated with their Sputnik vaccine. It looks very ugly.
This is such an enjoyable conversation between @coecke and @stephen_wolfram. I must watch event!
It's interesting that a conversation between two physicists has degenerated into a conversation about language and computation.
Wolfram has an interesting set of 'use cases' for language. (1) An interpretation that leads to computational and (2) a verification of constraint violations. As Wittgenstein has said, it's important to understand the game that is played with language.
In an economy that is structured for the human use of human beings, it is policy to keep people in poverty. nytimes.com/2021/06/13/opi…
Extending this, in a global economy. It is a policy for every country to keep other countries in poverty.
So there is a tacit hierarchy where groups of people keep other groups of people in a situation where they can be exploited. This is how global and local economies are structured. This is the way it is!
The difference between science and BS is that science gives you a lot of details whether you are interested or not. BS is devoid of any details. Furthermore, don't waste your time digging for more details, because there aren't any.
The tell between the two is science is enthusiastic in presenting the devil in the details. BS in contrast shies away from details.
Details however are not the same as verbosity. You can be verbose but devoid of any details.