So now I've finished @nytdavidbrooks Atlantic piece. It's not all terrible. I even agree with much of his last few paragraphs!

But he has such a narrow and clearly inadequate grasp of causality, based on his deeply, and I believe sincerely held view of power in the US. 1/
2/ The short version: he argues that woke tech/creative elites have monopolized cultural power and both lock out and disdain white working class America, leading to violent right-wing revolutionary impulses that faux-populist scum like Trump exploit.

What's missing from that?...
3/ The sustained attack since Nixon (at least) on education, science etc., ramped up in recent years by the post-truth stylings of Murdoch's empire and much else besides. Resentment against current elites isn't some natural response to overweening incumbents...
4/ It has been carefully nurtured for economic ends and the pursuit of political power. FL's DeSantis is presiding over a pandemic disaster to own the libs; that's not "BoBos fault," pace Mr. Brooks.

What's more...
5/ There is nothing comparable in the hands of the left, or the so-called creative class, to the network of both public-intellectual BS shops and blunt political cash flooded organizations run by the billionaire class on the right.
6/ Any analysis of partisan resentment that doesn't look at who fuels such resentment & to what end is...not just weak, but suspect: if Brooks isn't providing cover for the right's anti-democratic move, his words are indistinguishable from those of someone trying to do just that.
5.5/ See, e.g., this, fresh off the presses at the New Yorker: newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Levenson, Zṓiarchos

Thomas Levenson, Zṓiarchos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TomLevenson

8 Jul
The tweet above is a poor gloss on the article being touted. I agree with a fair amount of that article, more than I usually do with @conor64's work.

But I disagree with a lot, both small scale–the sneering contextless sideswipe re "Racecraft," for example and...1/
2/ Conor often deploys that presumption of risibility in his dislikes, BTW, rhetorical red meat but bad argument. The larger issue though is his both siderism which assumes the weaponized anti-CRT crowd & the racism-is-pervasive side are equivalent in either argument or power..
3/ I'm trying to learn to leap into every fight I'm invited to (or not), but the two sides are not mirror images. Among other things, there is a wide range of different types of evidence that racism still plays a huge role in US daily life...
Read 7 tweets
29 Jun
One last thought before I go: I can't tell you how the pandemic started. No one can. There is no dispositive evidence, and there is unlikely to be any for many years, if ever, given how long it has taken to track down previous new zoonotic diseases. 1/
2/ As Professor Tufekci put it, perhaps sharply, in an earlier reply tweet to me, it's a mistake to have too much certainty about probabilities. But it's important to be clear on what that necessary intellectual modesty actually requires...
3/ It means that we all need to do a lot of work. There are a series of specific steps required for a lab-escape scenario to actually occur. @beyerstein does a great job of detailing them here: newrepublic.com/article/162689….
Read 7 tweets
29 Jun
Here's an example of problematical coverage of the lab-escape scenario for COVID origins. An article in @techreview about "risky bat virus engineering" in Wuhan. It unfolds in 41 paragraphs. The quote below comes from the 40th graf.

This is a problem. Why?
2/ Because the previous 39 grafs build what appears to be a strong inferential case that there was something nasty in the woodshed that directly links the Wuhan Institute of Virology to the pandemic...which impression this tale-end-Charlie of a concession undercuts. A lot...
3/ If that quote had been in the nut graf, and had the story then been framed not as a Wuhan-mass-murder-suspect story, but as this is a warning sign that we need to get better world-wide re lab safety, ethics and regulation, this could have been a great story. As it is...
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
It will be some time before we realize just how badly major news media–@nytimes, @cnn, @VanityFair and many others, have handled the lab-escape story. The chain of cherry picked what-ifs has not changed much since last spring. The underlying science has not shifted. And yet...
2/ A small handful of sources and reporters, some with very interesting histories, have managed by dint of repetition and a kind of in-group associational credibility trading managed to transform a bunch of maybes into a discourse where could have=did happen...
3/ See @nprfreshair's interview last week with the @VanityFair writer whose name is slipping my mind for an example...

But I digress...
Read 13 tweets
23 Jun
This @washingtonpost story is a) mostly a nothing burger & b) a problem.

Why is the lead writer a politics reporter? (The other two are science/health writers, tho not virology/ID focused.) I get this is news-but what it means is not a political q.

washingtonpost.com/health/coronav…
2/ This isn't to say that the politics reporter in question is bad journalist. I don't follow his byline so I've no view on that. My presumption: he's fine until proven otherwise.

But virology, like any technical subject, takes time to grasp; work on the bleeding edge more so...
3/ And there's no way for him to judge who's bullshitting here, and to what extent. And that's key even in a scientific dispute with no political dimension. It's that much more so when the issue is being weaponized to assign blame (and maybe even start a war)...
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun
1/ I may teach this @nytimes article in my science journalism class next year as a model of how to do it wrong. nytimes.com/2021/06/14/wor…

@amyyqin and @ChuBailiang are expert and knowledgable China reporters. They seem in this piece out of their depth on the science...
2/ I don't have time right now (deadlines of my own) to fisk the problems in this piece fully...so I'll just point to two problems very quickly. They are clearly drawing on others' work to describe each of the alleged scenarios for a lab escape origin for the COVID pandemic...
3/ There account follows closely the arguments from Nicholas Wade, who lost his connection to @NYTScience because of his commitment to motivated reasoning on race and genetics, and the novelist/essayist Nicholas Wade. In repeating very similar claims without scrutiny...
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(