One of the most interesting things to me is how being gay was seen (even by gay people themselves) as a "behavior."
i.e. If you didn't "behave" in certain ways, you weren't gay.
1/
Being autistic is definitely still seen as a set of "behaviors." I think this is why even research perpetuates the myth that you can "grow out of autism,"
as if being "like neurotypicals," speaking, not stimming, and being compliant makes you "not autistic" anymore.
2/
Right after I typed that -
"I based being gay on my behavior, not my feelings. It was my behavior that made me gay, even though I still had feelings."
- person who used to be a leader that told people they could learn not to be gay
Just looking at that toddler checklist that's being used now-
It's all about what the toddler does or doesn't do, not what they experience. Do they look at you, do they respond to their name, do they want comfort, do they point?
Of course people think autism is only behaviors.
Parents are taught from the beginning that being autistic means doing something, not doing something, or acting out.
Rather than being autistic as part of an internal experience and how we think and process stimuli.
This is why words and framing on autism matter so much to me.
It matters whether you say "Does your child become anxious in new environments?"
or
"Does your child run away or cry in new environments?"
One is an internal experience, and one is a set of actions that someone with that internal experience may or may not do.
And it's also why people think there's some way to "look" autistic.
Autistic people must be sitting alone in a corner, or holding their ears, or crying, or rocking, or constantly looking away, or looking "aloof," or talking in complete monotone.
They think it's a behavior.
And that's why there's an entire industry, Applied Behavior Analysis Therapy, devoted to getting rid of what non-autistic people classify as "autistic behaviors."
Because if you as an autistic person don't "look" autistic to non-autistic people, you're not autistic anymore.
And to non-autistic people (and hell, even some autistic people because our society is crap),
That's good because it means you're setting your autistic child up for "success." Because they won't be ostracized or bullied and they'll have good job prospects because you can talk.
They're "helping" them by changing their behaviors and therefore making them "less autistic" (the traits are quantifiable because you have a checklist, right?)
and I see the same narrative of "helping" in this documentary.
Everything an autistic person does is autistic. Even autistic masking is autistic. Even autistic coping mechanisms are autistic.
Non-autistic people need to stop picking and choosing what is and is not autistic and labeling compliance as better, less autistic, or neurotypical.
About people who left the conversion therapy organization:
"The organization tried to say - oh, those are the outliers."
They don't give a timeline, but what happened to that specific gay conversion therapy organization:
They sat down with survivors on a news show, and the person who ran it could no longer deny that they were hurting people.
I wish survivors of ABA were believed in our society.
That being said, there are still many organizations promoting gay conversion therapy especially for transgender people.
I guess my point is:
Conversion therapy and ABA are very harmful and abusive for the same reasons -
Telling people there is something wrong with who they are.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I moderated a facebook group for a while for parents, with a focus on autistic girls.
I had to leave that facebook group because of the transphobic statements made by parents.
I was called "too aggressive" from other mods when I responded to bigotry & told it wasn't bad.
The parents were essentially telling other parents that the autistic kid questioning their gender identity (which is what the post was about) that autistic children are "often just confused, especially autistic girls." So I responded to that.
Another parent said cis women are more important than nonbinary people and should be "able to be represented" (which just meant "we should be allowed to exclude trans and nonbinary people from conversations and assume people's genders). One even complained about puberty blockers.
Don't you know that all shapes have social and cognitive emotions,
It's like neurotypicals want to design experiments just to tell us we're "deficient" in whatever it is they decide. Apparently we should know that shapes have emotions and intentions just like humans! 1/2
I'm imagining if neurotypical people didn't find intentions and emotions in shapes, and autistic people did, we would still be found to be "deficient" and told we were "off in our own world" or something. 🙄 2/2
Okay this gets even worse.
They used parents of autistic kids as a control group?! (UA = unaffected)
"Although the UA may also have a genetic predisposition to ASD, unaffected, first-degree relatives have been observed to perform better on social cognition tasks" [cont]
3/
This one is about how neurotypical people have terrible social skills too and are also bad at figuring out someone's emotion with facial expressions, research shows it - neuroclastic.com/2019/05/14/aut…
2/5
Do you remember when some non-autistic researchers got a $5,000,000 grant to create robots to annoy autistic people and tell them what they're doing wrong, which was somehow supposed to help autistic people acquire employment? neuroclastic.com/2020/10/06/5-m…
3/5
I love how "measuring autism" using questionnaires from decades ago created by cis white neurotypical researchers, & created with cis white hetero boys who don't mask in mind..
is seen as objective. 😂
Do they know how bad the AQ is?
"I usually notice car number plates"
Here are a few other gems:
"I am fascinated by dates." (??)
"When I'm reading a story, I can easily imagine what the characters might look like." (HOW is this related?)
"I don't particularly enjoy reading fiction."
"I am not very good at remembering people's date of birth."
2/9
I bet you people have not updated these questions in their research with this questionnaire. I bet you people still use the old AQ.
And oh, look! Turns out they're not actually helpful!
I'm on the burnout chapter of "Laziness Does Not Exist" and uh..
oh..
oh no..
"they had also begun to see their work as meaningless. A pervasive sense of dejection and apathy had descended upon their lives, sapping the joy from everything they did." - by .@drdevonprice
I have not fully processed just how terrible (traumatized?) I have felt in the past year about my PhD project.. Not processed at all..
My advisor: *sets literally impossible expectations that even other faculty tell me are actually impossible*
Me: If I just try hard enough, I think I can do it.. It has to be possible, right?