Yates reading "the declaration of support for constructive community engagement" around the Boulder Rez.

Council talked about this July 20. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1417696…
It's a rare bit of pushback against neighborhood opposition to city projects or private development, which is... not rare.
The city council is "incredibly proud" of the new visitor center, including the restaurant, Yates reads. "The city council supports the democratic process through which the lease" with the restaurant operator was established.
"City council supports the department staff ... and their good-faith efforts to address" community concerns. Council "also hears" the community concerns. "We hope to keep engaging."
"City council supports civil discourse," Yates continues, and opposes the disruption of events at the Rez. "There are more appropriate and productive ways" to engage.
Brockett met with neighbors of the Boulder Rez recently. There are continued concerns, he says, but also "unhappiness" with the email and cancellation of nonprofit events.
Wallach has a few issues with the resolution. "It seems to conflate the behavior of one or two people" with the whole neighborhood.
"There's nothing wrong with what they have done," Wallach says, which is petition the government for changes. "We took a different posture," and they are free to continue to disagree with that.

He also met with neighbors.
He supports the text of the resolution itself, but thinks some of the background is too "negative."

"I hope there's not an expectation that once we've taken a certain position, those with a dif attitude should ... go home."
Nagle concurs: I just want to make sure that neighborhood knows that there was an action of one person ... and that the quality of life as they know it will continue with the noise and light mitigation efforts in place.
Weaver: "Decisions are best made and appeals are best made when everybody respects different opinions."
Alright, that's enough of that.
@threadreaderapp please unroll. Thank you.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shay Castle

Shay Castle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shayshinecastle

4 Aug
Moving on: When will council ever be back for in-person meetings? It was supposed to be July 13, but there were technical difficulties.

Those are fixed, so here we are.
But, as NRV says, now we've got rising COVID cases and new CDC recommendations. boulderbeat.news/2021/07/28/cov…
"My position on coming back ... has evolved as we've seen some of these changes in the COVID variant rise," NRV says.
Read 25 tweets
4 Aug
Next item: Update on The People's Crossing (which was recently renamed) and a land acknowledgement. documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/DocVie…
Or you can read this to catch up: boulderbeat.news/2021/05/28/bou…
Not much to say on the renaming, other than it's officially been done on the city website and with temporary signs installed.

Permanent signs to be installed in September at event for fifth anniversary of indigenous people’s day
Cost: $21,300 to replace all those
Read 21 tweets
4 Aug
We're talking about another city ballot item, to make the charter consistent RE: rules on referendum petitions. Presentation here: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/DocVie…
We haven't talked about this at all, so it took me by surprise.

"It wasn't part of our original planning," attorney Kathy Haddock says. It was "a good catch by a citizen." (She doesn't say who, but I've got a few guesses)
In a nutshell, a city working group recommended lower signature limits for (some) petitions. The voters then OK'd those in 2018. But the charter hasn't been updated for everything yet.
Read 24 tweets
4 Aug
While I puzzle on Yates' recusal, we're moving on to the public hearing for the CCS tax extension (being rebranded to the capital infrastructure tax). Staff presentation: documents.bouldercolorado.gov/WebLink/DocVie…
We've covered this so thoroughly, I don't wanna repeat too much.

Council discussed on:
Feb. 9
boulderbeat.news/2021/02/10/tax…
Read 62 tweets
4 Aug
Council is doing a special meeting before its study session next week (Aug. 10) so they can schedule the CU South annexation public hearing.

But we'll talk about that later. Put a pin in it.
Yates is recusing himself from voting on the consent agenda (of which this item is a part). He doesn't say why....
Ok that's literally the only thing on the consent agenda. No idea why he is recusing himself. Anyone want to enlighten me?
Read 11 tweets
4 Aug
OK, ready for this 7 p.m. city council meeting? Yeah, me neither.

Tonight we've got public hearings on all the stuff council is sending to the ballot: tax extension plus some language cleanup and a change in council pay schedule (not a raise)*
*Except for people who miss a lot of meetings
We've also got an update on The People's Crossing and a city land acknowledgement for/with the peoples who originally inhabited this land.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(