There are very shabby lethal activists on CH that are passionate about quenching the thirst of TPLF particularly at the cost of civilians life in Tigray. All they want is, the misery of the people to be carried on as long as the crises pile up and they are reading Getachew Reda's
'we are advancing' tweets. For them, it doesn't matter if it means using child soldiers, obstructing humanitarian access, and justifying a war that they were condemning before the declaration of the unilateral ceasefire. Fabricating lies and gaslighting to create an image that
doesn't exist is, something they think, they are smart at. They are busy ruining every civil discussion, tainting ideas, and debasing the concern of the people towards humanitarian access. They would panic otherwise. It is just their desire of discouraging activists, and keeping
the humanitarian crisis continue. For them, it is just a project being done at the cost of civilians life. There are CH rooms they were justifying the war with excitement as TPLF took up humanitarian crisis in Afar and Amhara regions; dicussed the significance of destabilizing
the country, and justifying the war and a collateral damage. I was shocked to hear that, as most have been saying 'stop war' before end of June, and all of a sudden they started 'supporting the war'. If there is anyone with different idea or counter arguement or even who would
uncover their double standard, they'd unapologetically throw them to audience. If they are not setting up a room to spread their insensitive narratives about civilians life, they are busy wandering between rooms and ruining discussions.
Sometimes they act like they have lost temper for no valid reason, sometimes they randomly insult, sometimes they say war mongering slogans, sometimes they scream mimicking some animal, and often they intentionally go off topic. At the end, they bring it to Twitter
with a total alteration of context. They do whatever it takes to discourage and obstruct discussion. Then the discussion will be shifted towards them. They do this just because they don't want others to discuss about humanitarian interventions. If humanitarian actors, they fear
TPLF will run out of an agenda to press and catches the World's attention with. The idea of demanding humanitarian access is something that would stop their breath, as providing gate to humanitarian actors would need keeping TPLF accountable.