Please share this with everyone who is sinking into desperation:
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT URGENT.
It was urgent in the 60s, 70, 80s, and 90s. Now, tens of millions of people are ALREADY dying every year and species are going extinct at an unprecedented rate due to #ClimateCrisis
and all the interlocking ecological and social crises. The institutions sharing this narrative of urgency are the ones who did not take valid actions when there was still time, who even criminalized such actions while profiting off false solutions.
The reason they talk urgency now is not because they care about all the poor and racialized people who are dying or the unique habitats being lost, it's because they are afraid of losing power. They admit this quite clearly at Davos, at NATO summits, in their financial journals.
No matter what happens now, we will have to deal with a convulsive, sometimes deadly biosphere for the foreseeable future, maybe the next 5 generations, maybe the next 50.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING is not to find the quickest, easiest bandaid solution, but to find the best solution for the long haul. This means totally dismantling the system and the mentality responsible.
THIS is what has green capitalists like Elon Musk, the millionaire CEOs of the environmental NGOs, state leaders, scientists of the leading technocratic institutions, and the cheerleaders of white supremacist western civilization so afraid. It means a world without them.
Our most urgent duty is to take care of one another, to help one another survive. This includes our bioregions and the other living things around us.
And the next most important thing is to make sure those responsible will never be able to harm anyone ever again.
Whether that means destroying the institutions that give them power, making sure that their names live on in infamy as the most evil people to ever walk the face of the earth, or hunting them down in their doomsday bunkers, time will tell.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All the polarization aside, I find myself in the middle on this one.
On the one hand the point that nearly the entire Left will get swept up in support of patriotic wars destroying years of momentum, whether it's 1914 or 2001, is tragic and true and we shouldn't expect otherwise.
Though I imagine CR doesn't go this way, for me it's another reason for anticapitalist and anticolonial movements to retain a historically accurate view of our relation to the Left rather than considering ourselves part of it. Because of its systematic role in these moments.
On the other hand those who prioritize movement building are obvs gonna be frustrated with this kind of flippant take because it decenters all the hard organizing and valuable lessons that were drawn from countless protests, port blockades, counterrecruiting campaigns, and more.
#OtD in 1936, fascists executed 4000 unarmed people connected to the workers' movement in Badajoz.
Also during these days, 15 years earlier, Spain began a massive campaign of mustard gas against rebelling Amazigh populations in their north African colonies.
Many thousands were killed, though there is little documentation and almost complete apathy across the Spanish left.
Even a focus on self-preservation would demand these atrocities receive more attention, since fascism begins in the colonies and then comes home.
The colonial war was a key stage in the careers of Franco and other future fascist leaders. But it seems unexamined white supremacy is stronger.
(Could my Marxist friends help me out with this one, because I feel like there's a pattern.)
#OtD in 1936, Durruti's column of armed workers marched out of Barcelona to take the key city of Zaragoza. They liberated much of Aragón in the first days but failed to take the capital.
In large part, this was because Communists and left parties made sure the anarchist militias, the greatest by number, didn't get weapons and logistical support even though this meant sabotaging the fight against the fascists.
Flash back to the beginning of the 20s when the International, effectively controlled from Moscow, began programmatically sabotaging workers' organizations they could not absorb, for example a worldwide network of dockworkers who leaned anarchist.
I think the rains are finally coming, which should be cause for celebration. But after 8 months with barely any, the earth is dust, and if we get strong summer downpours, so much topsoil is going to wash away.
The people who think we can maintain industrial agriculture with
1/2
just a few modifications, they really have no clue about the world we're living in. Unfortunately, they're the ones making the recommendations for the changes we need, from the UN, agribusiness (obviously), universities, and at the head of social movements in the Global North.
For those wondering about the connection: the monocrop machine harvests were brought in in June and the fields have been left bare and compacted to bake in the sun since then.
Commercial orchards also leave the ground bare between trees to facilitate machine-speed harvests using
#OtD in 1209, the Albigensian Crusade kicked off with the massacre of Béziers, in which Catholic troops slaughtered 10-20,000 Cathars, Waldensians, Jews, and Catholics who had refused to abandon them.
The commander Amalric ordered, "Kill them all; God will know his own."
THREAD!
This episode tells us so much about the early roots of whiteness, the modern state, and the patriarchal renaissance.
Many of the earliest crusades took place in what would become Europe against heretical Christians, Muslims, and pagan lower classes who had thrown off Christianity
(like the earlier Wendish Crusade). They were a proactive, strategic campaign by the Vatican and local aristocrats to revive the dream of the Roman state on a foundation of ideological unity. State formation and centralized Christianity went hand in hand.
Though all states in history have been ecocidal, a growing chorus is spreading the claim that only strong states can solve the ecological crisis.
Why is this so dangerous? In a word, colonialism.
Read on...
Across the world, from Venezuela & Brazil to Kenya to India, the most effective experiences in reforestation and food sovereignty have been autonomous, territorialized, and decentralized. Allowed to develop, these movements would take care of the greater part of carbon emissions,
carbon sequestration, and habitat protection, while also addressing food insecurity, environmental racism, Indigenous sovereignty, and global inequality, problems that ALL proposals focused on alternative energies and geoengineering or high tech sequestration only aggravate.