🎉Honored to win the 2021 Victor Cohn Prize for Excellence in Medical Science Reporting!
I couldn't hope for better reviews: “She is holding a massive mirror up to our society as a whole.” Another wrote her stories are “nuanced & will haunt me for years.”casw.org/casw/announcem…
I'm so lucky to write about issues I care about deeply. This award highlights my work over 5 years, most recently my feature on how 40+ years of rising inequality fueled America's pandemic -- and how scientists feel about it. nature.com/immersive/d415…
My portfolio includes this feature on the WHO's fight against Ebola in Congo, which is also about how much it takes to combat infectious diseases against a backdrop of political opportunism, poverty and long-standing exploitation. nature.com/articles/d4158…
Another is my feature on the race to stop drug-resistant malaria from spreading in Cambodia & Myanmar, and how this requires political will even more than scientific prowess. nature.com/immersive/d415…
The judges call me intrepid, but truth be told, finding the right structure for a story makes me pick at my hair follicles and quiver in my slippers. I owe a massive thanks to all my editors @Nature & especially @bmaher who doubles as a writing therapist.
Thanks to the judges of the Victor Cohn Prize. There was a ton of incredible writing this past year, and I'm sure the decision was tough. I'm honored to share the award with powerhouse @HelenBranswell. 🙌🏽 Check out her excellent piece @statnews: statnews.com/2020/04/20/the…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Most cases at the start of the outbreak link to markets selling animals. None link other localities, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Genetic differences between the coronavirus from horseshoe bats (RaTG13) and SARS2 equates to decades of divergence. That means RaTG13 isn't the closest relative of SARS2 naturally or unnaturally.
🧵It took a hell of a lot of personal harassment for me to think about how Twitter shapes media discourse. “This is not the case of people being mean to other people” says @edzitron.
My personal case? I’ve written fairly nuanced & technical pieces about the science behind Covid lab-leak arguments & repercussions of unsubstantiated allegations.
Trolls called me idiot,shill & made wild accusations. (I'm intentionally not posting them here but I have receipts)
One troll alleged I had connections to Daszak, posting an old cropped photo. In this context, I thought it was doctored. It wasn’t. I *immediately* corrected my mistake. But hate & threats fill my inbox.
Very interesting details on US intelligence on a lab-leak, from former US intelligence officer. "I write this because, to put it bluntly, I’m tired of being the butt of stupid and paranoid conspiracy theories being promulgated by those who know better." christopherashleyford.medium.com/the-lab-leak-i…
⭐️ An excerpt from an email from the former Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Non-Proliferation, last year 👇🏽
"COVID-19 is not yet the worst pandemic in history. But we should not tempt fate."
Darn sobering when @larrybrilliant, one of eradicators of smallpox, writes that SARS-CoV-2 cannot be eradicated. This is a grave read with a number of solutions listed.
Why won't Covid end? One reason is indifference. "Americans were taking off their masks and preparing for summer vacations, while India, with only three percent of its 1.4 billion inhabitants fully vaccinated, was ablaze in funeral pyres." foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
Another reason why it won't end, says @larrybrilliant et al, is that SARS-CoV-2 will live on in multiple animal species (more than 200 people contracted COVID-19 from minks). So that's why the world must work together on surveillance & mitigation w/vaccines.
The WSJ is now feeding the news cycle another article claiming to have "damning" evidence that COVID was created in a lab. It's a scientific claim, so one I can assess. 🧵
I value scientific experience (the kind that brought you the vaccine), so note the authors are (1) a self-proclaimed entrepreneur in breast health & coronavirus, who has received FDA warning letters (2) a Koch-funded climate denying physicist, albeit one who changed his position.
They reference the CGG codon that David Baltimore called a "smoking gun" in Nicholas Wade's piece. Baltimore told me he only meant to point out that we should consider a lab-origin hypothesis (uncontroversial). He told @profvrr that Wade twisted his words.
Allegations aren't a great way to encourage collaboration on an origin study. And beyond origin studies, countries must work together to curb this crisis and prepare for the next one.
The toxicity of the debate is also fueling shameful online harassment, and @angie_rasmussen can tell you that's not fun.