Idaho officials launched a task force to root out liberal "indoctrination" in education. But encountering views you find objectionable isn't a problem in higher ed — it's an indispensable feature.
So far, the task force has come up short in its quest.
The task force asked for public comments on indoctrination "to protect our young people." But when reporters sought those comments, the lt. gov.'s office clammed up, claiming a litany of bogus exceptions to public records laws.
FIRE ultimately obtained some of those records.
While a handful of comments cited troubling interactions with students or faculty, the overwhelming majority of the thousands of comments were sharply critical of the task force and its claims of widespread indoctrination.
The task force pledged legislation to solve this claimed problem. But politicized efforts to eliminate certain subjects or ideologies are not the answer.
Academic freedom, which is central to a university’s core mission of advancing knowledge, must remain a paramount value.
FIRE will continue to watch the task force’s activity and oppose any attempts to limit the academic freedom and First Amendment rights of students and faculty.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A recording of an “Anti-Racist Rhetoric & Pedagogies” workshop acquired by FIRE raises alarm bells about the state of free expression and conscience at @UofOklahoma.
@UofOklahoma “I, in this case, usually look for my students who might be, like, entertaining the idea of listening to a problematic argument. Then I say, ‘we don’t have to listen to that.’”
That’s right — even thinking about listening to a disfavored argument is apparently to be discouraged.
One instructor notes that if students use “derogatory remarks, critiques, and hate speech,” as well as “white supremacist ideas or sources,” she will call the student out.
It's a standard question asked of history students.
But when a @StJohnsU prof. posed it to his students about the “Columbian Exchange,” he was removed from his class, investigated, and found guilty of bias.
@StJohnsU Three days after this lesson, professor Richard Taylor was removed from teaching.
A month later, he was informed he violated the “University’s Policy against Bias, Discrimination, and Harassment."
He was not told which part of the over 2,300-word policy he allegedly violated.
@StJohnsU Taylor was denied access to the evidence used to support the finding that he violated university policy.
“St. John’s might want to ask a history professor about other authority systems that would punish you based on vague wrongdoing with no evidence,” said FIRE's @AdGo.
@duqedu The professor’s use of the slur was pedagogically relevant and protected under Duquesne’s promises of free expression and academic freedom.
@duqedu Last week, FIRE wrote to @usedgov about this matter, alerting the Department that Duquesne appeared to be substantially misrepresenting the nature of its academic program — and violating its promises to its accreditor — by promising rights it does not provide in practice.
@FordhamNYC One photo, posted on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, is of the student lawfully holding a gun off-campus, captioned “Don’t Tread on me.”
@FordhamNYC The other photo is of St. Louis police officer David Dorn, who was killed by looters last month.
It's captioned, “Y’all a bunch of hypocrites,” referencing his frustration with what he refers to as “the nonchalant societal reaction over [Dorn’s] death.”
Advocates for free speech and due process on campus won one of their *biggest-ever* victories today with the finalization of long-awaited new @usedgov Title IX regulations.
@usedgov The regulations guarantee critical due process protections that Americans recognize as essential to securing justice, but that have for too long been denied to students accused of sexual misconduct on college campuses.
@usedgov Among the procedural protections guaranteed are:
* An express presumption of innocence
* Live hearings with cross-examination conducted by an advisor of choice, who may be an attorney
* Sufficient time and information to prepare for interviews and a hearing
@babson@nytimes Babson itself described Phansey as a faculty member — until it began scrubbing its website to delete mentions of his name. Unfortunately for them, Google’s cache kept copies of the pages it was deleting.
@babson@nytimes For example, here’s an April 19 profile on @Babson’s site, now memory-holed: