This thread tells a shocking but common story about upland vandalism.
It begins with this blatant misinformation on a display board erected at public expense by @NidderdaleAONB. It claims that burning the land combats climate change and protects wildlife. The opposite is true.
2. I wonder whether this reflects the influence of the landed interests on its advisory committee: such as the Moorland Association. In any case, it looks to me as if it's using public money to promote private interests.
Oh, and take a look at its logo: a red grouse.
3. This is quite common: display boards in "protected" areas often claim that trashed wastelands are magnificent wildlife havens, and their disastrous management is the best way to treat them. We need honest communication about the state of the living world. #Tellthetruth
4. Abutting the grouse moor is Guisecliff Wood. It's a rich and beautiful ecosystem,  much of which appears to have regenerated in the past century or so.
The only thing stopping the trees from returning to the moor is burning by the grouse shooters. This is the edge of the most recent burn. You can see scorched saplings in the foreground, and living ones beyond, spilling from the edge of the wood.
The burning creates the grouse shooters' ideal landscape: MAMBA. Miles And Miles of Bugger All.
7. The grouse shooters burn the land to produce the young heather leaves grouse like to eat, creating a kind of gigantic upland chicken farm. They claim to be "burning heather". But in reality they burn everything that can't get away fast enough.
Photo by @Lukesteele4
8. We've been taught to fetishise monocultures of heather or rough grass in the uplands. But they're typical of landscapes worldwide that have been repeatedly burnt, cut or grazed. Upland woods are much rarer habitats in the UK, and much richer in nationally important species.
The name of this ecological desert, by the way?
You couldn't make it up.
10. Unfortunately, it's entirely typical. As @RewildingB showed yesterday, grouse shooting moors also blight vast tracts of our national parks.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
11. They are one of the reasons why there are more trees/hectare in some London boroughs than in some of our national parks.
It's a disgraceful state of affairs.
bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…
12. Let's demand wilder national parks.
act.rewildingbritain.org.uk/demand-wilder-…
I wrongly credited the burnt adder photo to Luke Steele. It should be credited to @MoorWatch / Siobhan Macmahon. My apologies.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

7 Aug
As horrifying fires devastate large tracts of North America, Siberia, Greece and Turkey, have we already stepped over the brink? We're seeing the kind of escalating disasters some of us warned about for decades, as ecosystems are pushed past their tipping points.
Thread/
Our warnings were greeted with denial and insults: we were accused of being jeremiahs, killjoys, communists, fascists etc, etc. Even those who paid lip service to the science refused to act on it. They made speeches and set targets, but shunned the necessary economic change.
Everything else came first: the corporate lobbyists, the road building, the unnecessary wars, the urge to appease media billionaires and comfortable, complacent voters. Scarcely anyone told the truth. Self-interest and egotism pushed us towards catastrophe.
Read 9 tweets
27 Jul
There are few fantasies as stupid and destructive as space colonisation.
Jeff Bezos comes as close as any real person I've seen to a genuine James Bond villain. The megalomaniac fantasies, the maniacal laugh, the sense of something unfulfilled, unsettled, out of joint with himself, that drives him to such excesses of greed and display.
Thread/
But far from calling out this cackling maniac, drowning under his own hat, much of the world's media  - even those he doesn't own - grovel before him. Governments give him everything he asks for. In the real world, Bond would work for Blofeld.
Read 9 tweets
24 Jul
Why is this legal? It sounds like the work of a trammel netter, knocking out the long-lived species crucial to marine foodwebs. The fishing industry's mass destruction of our beautiful ecosystems has to stop.
walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-new…
The ratio of destruction to production of some of these fishing operations is off the scale. It's possible that the person who killed all those sharks didn't even fill a fish box with their target species, or take home any fish at all.
Our governments allow the fishing industry to treat our seas as a free-for-all. The result is cascading ecological collapse, as ancient biological structures on the seabed and big, slow-growing species are destroyed en masse. It's heartbreaking.
Read 5 tweets
22 Jul
Imagine an oil executive making self-serving and misleading claims about renewable energy in Radio Times.
Then imagine BBC TV giving him a primetime platform every week to promote his own industry.
msn.com/en-gb/foodandd…
This is where we are with @BBCCountryfile, which makes no attempt to balance its coverage of livestock farming, one of the world’s most damaging industries.
Balance?
Impartiality?
Every week it drives a coach and horses through the BBC’s editorial guidelines.
Is there any other kind of BBC programme making in which industrial lobbyists are given primetime slots, week in, week out, to promote their industry, without any challenge or attempt at balance?
Read 7 tweets
19 Jul
Any reasonable conception of freedom holds that we should be free to do as we wish, up to, but not beyond, the point at which we cause harm to other people.
In other words, it does not include the freedom to spread a deadly virus.
Over the years, great efforts have been made to promote a different conception of freedom: "I can do what the hell I like, regardless of the impact on anyone else".
They call it libertarianism. I call it being a selfish arse.
Of course, in this conception, "I" does not mean "you". Those who scream about their own, absolute, freedoms tend to be the first to deny freedoms to others, be they asylum seekers, protesters, Gypsies etc, as you can see in the current Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul
For 20 years, the billionaire press told us "we can easily adapt to a warmer world".
Try telling that to people in Germany, Belgium and the western seaboard of North America.
And this is just one degree of heating.

The media did this, as surely as the fossil fuel companies.
Let's not forget those who told us there was little to worry about. People with massive media platforms, who helped push us towards catastrophe.
Matt Ridley
Bjorn Lomborg
Nigel Lawson
Christopher Booker
David Rose
Peter Hitchens ....
The roll of dishonour is long and grim
And, of course, their editors and proprietors.
And the so-called thinktanks shilling for the fossil fuel companies.
Doubtless they all believed they were being ever so clever. But if we recall their names at all, we'll remember them as traitors to humanity.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(