Uwe Hohn, Neeraj Chopra's coach, and the only man to ever throw a javelin over 100m did not win an Olympic medal because East Germany boycotted the 1984 games in Los Angeles
As throws reached 100m during the mid-80s, the design of the javelins changed to push the centre of gravity 4 cm ahead, which reduced throw distance because it's harder to throw something that is more front-heavy
While it's tempting to assume that this sport is all about shoulder and arm strength, it isn't. The biggest biomechanical factor in throw distance is the ability to plonk the left foot down and transfer energy via the hips and trunk to the throwing arm
And do this while maintaining as much velocity as possible since that is the single biggest factor in the throw distance. So the Germans and the Czech guys might be taller and wider, but the gold medal-winning throw of Neeraj should tell you it's not just upper body strength
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When you add a pinch of baking soda and a teabag to the pressure cooker when cooking chickpeas, you are using the chemistry of acid-base reactions and also exploiting the ability of sodium bicarbonate to break bonds in pectin.
When you add gram flour (besan) to yoghurt and whisk it to prevent it from splitting in a kadhi, you are experimenting with the physics of emulsions. When you whip air into egg whites for cakes, you are dealing with foams
When you make a perfectly soft-boiled egg, or work cold butter into an omelette, or squeeze lime juice into a marinade for chicken, you are denaturing protein molecules with precision and control.
The erstwhile school librarian of my late father’s village, Gopalasamudram (near Tirunelveli) used to maintain an annual handwritten diary of literally everything he learned during the year. This is the diary from 1956
The list of Melakartha ragas in Carnatic music
English proverbs (occasionally with Tamil translations). Also some surprising entries
Flavour memories combine and interfere with subsequent aroma detection. For instance, anything with vanilla will taste mildly sweet even if it contains no sugar because we associate vanilla only with sweet dishes. This is a trick one can use to reduce the intake of added sugars.
Adding powdered cardamom to your tea can make it taste sweeter with a relatively smaller amount of sugar. Incidentally, umami can make a smaller amount of sugar linger for longer, so using glutamate-heavy ingredients like walnuts in desserts lets you use lesser sugar
This is also why eggless cakes & ice cream taste cloyingly sweet. Egg yolks, which have a reasonable amount of glutamates let you get away with less sugar.
What connects two 18th century German physicians/naturalists, the Nawabs of Arcot, and winged termites with South Indian cooking? A thread...
Johann Andreas Murray was a Swedish physician of German descent who studied under Carl Linnaeus, who pioneered the binomial nomenclature of all living organisms, a system that we continue to use today.
He was also a pioneering pharmacologist who wrote a 6-volume compendium of herbal remedies and edited subsequent versions of Linneaus’ work - “The Vegetable Kingdom”.
Military research regularly cross-pollinates into consumer innovation - Stainless steel was originally invented for gun barrels, and Microwave ovens invented during research on naval radar systems (the inventor's chocolate bar melted in his pocket when working on radar systems)
The reason so much orange juice is consumed today is thanks to the research of Linda Brewster, who used a debittering enzyme to reduce the bitterness of Limonin in all citrus juices. Without this, the shelf life of orange juice is very short.
Theory: All WhatsApp messages that end with 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 are misinformation. Also ones that begin with “The following has been researched by IIT/IIM/IISc...”. Any other patterns?
If one could only use the replies to this tweet to train a classifier 😬 But, on a less snarky note, responding to misinformation with “facts” is a waste of time. No one changes their mind on the basis of facts. Especially when delivered from a place of arrogance
Listening to the @notsmartblog gave me an alternative approach. Responding with a “why do you believe this? How do you know this is verified?” forces a different part of the brain to deal with it, and is more likely to result in a less defensive response