Quick observations on Berkshire's 10-Q:
Cash: Because everyone mentions it, $144B is up from $138B at yearend. For perspective, cash totals 15.78% of $912.5B in total firm assets, down from 15.89% at yearend. Firm assets grew $39B from yearend. Book value up $27.2B to $470.4B. 1/
There is no liability for T-bills purchased so the media and other watchers will correctly report the cash balance. Much lamentation will occur about the "huge" cash pile and the inability to spend it. It's not much above the 12% average cash to assets relationship since 1997. 2/
On spending cash, share repos of $6B in the quarter, following $6.5B in Q1 and $24.7B for all of 2020. Another 4,181 "A" share equivalents have been bought since 6/30 to 7/26. At ~$427k/share, that's an additional $1.8B. The cadence of repos roughly matches operating profit. 3/
Monthly repos at $1.8B, $0.8B and $3.4B for the three months to June 30. 14,426 A share equivalents were bought at an average $417,816 per share, which is $278.54 per B share. On 1.533m average A's out on avg BVPS of $302,455, the average price paid to book value was 138%. 4/
Interestingly, BRK stated they would not repurchase shares if the cash balance dropped below $30B. This had been $20B since at least 2011. At the annual meeting, Mr. Buffett acknowledged that Berkshire will generally have on the order of $70B in cash on hand, matching my work. 5/
Growth capex continues to be a terrific use of capital. BNSF and BHE spent a combined $4.1B YTD and look to spend an additional $6.2B in the 2nd half. Capex at these operations widely outpaces depreciation expense. BHE in particular has a very long runway to spend large sums. 6/
Debt outstanding modestly reduced. New LT debt raised: Holding company sold 600m 30-year euro debt at 0.5% and $1.5B of 5 to 20-year yen denominated debt. BNSF raised $925m 30-year at 3.3%. BHE raised $550m 30-year at 3.4%. Amazing. Berkshire is lengthening at VERY LOW yields. 7/
Equity portfolio: BRK sold $1B and bought $2.1B in the quarter, for a net purchase of $1.13B. Sizable sales occurred among commercial and industrial holdings. I'd guess more $GM, $CHV and the drugs were trimmed. Look to be small buys in financials, so adds to $AON and $MMC? 8/
The stock portfolio, mostly owned by the insurers, returned ~9.6% in 2Q and ~12.7% for the first 6 months. As of Friday the stocks are up ~16.5%. Apple, 43% of the portfolio, was only up 3.6% at midyear but is now up 10.6%. Stocks are $308B at 6/30, up from $281B at 12/31. 9/
Insurance: Underwriting profit a little below what I'd call normal in 2Q and close to normal YTD. Positive reserve development. Ex normal (accounting) losses in retroactive and periodic payment annuity insurance overall in great shape. Float at $142B, up from $138B at 12/31. 10/
Pandemic rebates continued into early 2Q, have finally run their course at GEICO. Losses back to more normal level, even too high. Nobody took price during the pandemic. Frequencies way up. More Teslas on the road, crashing w/ FSD or operated by testosterone-charged lunatics? 11/
GEICO underwriting 93.4%. Premiums up reflecting fewer rebates but also up 4.9% in price. Expenses firmly under control. Advertising up. As frequencies and severities rise, look for GEICO and the industry to get price late 2021 into 2022. Good recent headway vs $PGR recently. 12/
Primary continues to grow rapidly, particularly Specialty. Premiums earned will >$11B for the year. Workmans' comp brutal pricing, seeing this across the industry. Huge volume increases in med mal. The TX storm Uri was expensive. $156m at Primary and $418m at P/C reinsurance. 13/
Covid losses of $180 at Primary and $575m in P/C reinsurance. Still developing, but BRK is in WAY better shape vs industry. Less exposure, better policy language, way more capital and less capital at risk. Higher mortality causing sizable losses in reinsurance life/health. 14/
Insurance (and throughout) interest income WAY down, naturally with short Treasury yields near zero. Thanks, Jay. I bake in no expectation of ever earning any real or nominal yield on cash. Impacts the optionality premium of assumed returns on deploying cash over time. 15/
The rail is chugging. Recovered much of depressed volumes and profitability. Still not back to normal steady state. More improvement to come. You can see the variable cost nature of the business. On revenues up 26% y/y, fuel expense more than doubled and compensation up 17%. 16/
Huge recovery in shipping consumer and industrial. Even coal revenues up 42% on 32% rise in cars/units. Utilities seeing higher demand and also building inventories. This will run its course and coal shipments will head back down over time. 17/
Energy continues to kill it. Profit recovered and up 22%. Retail/wholesale volumes up. Tax rate continues negative, supporting growth in wind, solar and grid. Final portion of assets bought from Dominion $D will not close as previously announced. Current DOJ tough on deals. 18/
Looks like all of MSR & Finance nearly fully recovered, except Precision, whose customers have adequate inventory & activity nowhere near 2019 levels. Way below. Lots of discussion at MSR about cost increases/supply chain problems. Seeing this in almost every release I read. 19/
Housing businesses on fire (huge growth and profit in the residential brokerage business inside BHE as well - largest brokerage in the country). Industrial strong - Lubrizol, Marmon and IMC up high 20s to mid-40s. Profits up more on operating leverage and cost control. 20/
If Clayton keeps growing as it has been, it will grow to be larger than BRK itself! Kidding, but sailed through Covid, growing sales > 30%, profit > 40%, Clayton is getting very large. Sales will top $10B in '21. Pretax profit pushing $2B. Now the largest sub in MSR by far. 21/
Forest River - Huge RV demand. Balance of consumer products and service businesses all recovering. Retail closed for much of 2Q last year making y/y comps worthless. Against '19 lots of recovery & even higher sales and profits. BHA (auto dealer) 30% increase in vehicle sales. 22/
Even McLane improved, w/ pretax profit 0.7%. Won't be healthy until pretax recovers to ~1%. Lots of credit losses last year when restaurants closed or limited to takeout/outside dining. Still operating below capacity. Worker "shortage" due to free money and video games. 23/
In total a pretty mundane Q. No elephants but between repos and growth capex, coupled with lengthening debt at low rates, capital allocation is excellent. Despite the stock up 23.7% YTD with book value "only" up 6.1%, BVPS is up 8.4% and intrinsic value/share advances nicely. 24/
Berkshire is doing what it should be doing with capital and profit. Most subs harmed last year are fully recovered or well on the way. Cost & supply chain pressures exist, but BRK is well situated to manage these. That more don't emulate the behavior of the place is an advantage.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christopher Bloomstran

Christopher Bloomstran Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisBloomstran

27 Jul
For those that haven’t read Robinhood’s 360-page S-1 and subsequent registration amendment, some brief observations follow on some of the most egregious aspects of one of the most one-sided, enrich the insider casino offerings I’ve ever seen, and there have been some doozies. 1/
If Robin Hood robbed the rich to give to the poor, the modern-day version is now in the business of gutting the sheep and pocketing the wealth of the retail speculator for himself. Fleecing at least. “Robinhood is democratizing finance for all,” reads the prospectus. Sure. 2/
Robinhood, who in December paid a $65 million fine (without admitting or denying guilt, wink) for best execution and payment for order flow alleged violations, will raise on the order of $2.3 billion from new shareholders in its upcoming IPO. What does The IPO investor get? 3/
Read 43 tweets
4 Jul
Outside of the financial reporting of certain car companies, SPAC promoters and countless others, I haven't read fiction in ~30 years. Limited, I know. Outside of investing/business reading, I love US history, particularly the American Revolution. In the spirit of the 4th, 1/
I thought it would be fun sharing some favorites. Mostly bios and written from the "great man" perspective. To McCullough, Adams was the greatest; but to Chernow and Ellis it was Washington. Of course, when Ellis wrote on Jefferson he was the man and so forth. All were great. 2/
What's remarkable about these giants of the revolution is the risk they took in rebellion from England. Captured, the signers of the Declaration and other revolutionaries would have hung. It's amazing how young many of them were. Franklin was the elder statesman at age 70. 3/
Read 11 tweets
3 Jul
Happy Independence Day! 🇺🇸🎇 Doing some quarter-end portfolio/index maintenance before the pyrotechnics and some interesting observations about S&P 500 index sales and earnings. Expect some negative surprises on the horizon given an extrapolation of what appears to be a boom. 1/
Index sales per share fell 3.7% in 2020, but the share count rose 1.8%, as it does during crises when companies need money but shares are cheap. Buy high, sell low. Overall dollar sales thus declined only 2.0% from $11.72T to $11.48T. 2/
EPS (operating, so pre writeoffs) fell 22% from $157.12 to $122.37. A huge recovery in profit & sales is underway. Wall Street pegs EPS at $187.30 & $210.69 for '21 & '22. Let’s assume a full recovery in dollar revenues to a linear 2.5% nominal growth from 2019 through 2022. 3/
Read 13 tweets
19 Jun
Upon further review, looks like you crowned yourself the next Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway in your past THREE annual letters, @chamath. Two weeks ago we had some fun digging in to your selected disclosure methodologies, didn't we? But oh my does it get even more bizarre. 1/
I’ve now had the misfortune of reading all 3 and am stunned at the apparent need to bend, break really, the facts to make your performance shine. Let’s examine your comparison to $BRKA in your past three letters, digging yourself a hole in 2018 and burying yourself in 2020. 2/
Book value, skip a year, book value, stock price. That’s YOUR selected method for Berkshire as a benchmark moving target. You can’t make this stuff up. Curiouser and curiouser, to quote Alice, can be the only way to characterize the unusual presentation of your performance. 3/
Read 38 tweets
5 Jun
Bravo Tesla on "improved" disclosure. When screwing the customer, let 'em know it up front. Gas is at prices last seen in '14, so good thing for a Tesla's gas savings - except you already paid for it. What? Let’s build a car. How about a practical Model 3. Base price $35,690. 1/ Image
Recently, the customer was informed that gas savings would be $4,300 (more on other models) on the first page of the build, with the final price a surprise at the end. The upfront language is now altered, some would say transparent, some may say obfuscating. You be the judge. 2/
Let’s keep it simple and avoid upcharges by sticking with standard options - Pearl White paint, 18” wheels and All-Black interior. Let’s skip the $10,000 Full Self-Driving as well for now, since we’re now told "regulatory approval may take longer, in some jurisdictions." Sure. 3/ Image
Read 16 tweets
1 Jun
Ten years? Did you read the disclosure in YOUR letter stating YOUR returns begin on 6/1/11, or did you forget when you launched your first fund? You don’t appear to even have a ten-year track record, @chamath. Looks like 9 yrs 7 mos. The whole thing is confusing. Intentional? 1/ Image
Are you desperate to include Berkshire’s 48.7% decline and the S&P 500’s 26.4% drop in your “long-run” comparison? Actually, it appears that you do have a 10-year record. As of tomorrow...Of course a year-to-date presentation would have to include the losses on the four SPACs. 2/
Next, I’m very confused by your reply stating, “the discrepancy in your S&P returns vs ours is because we calculated it as an IRR based on when we made our investments.” What is “IT?” You label your returns as IRR, but are you saying you calculated index returns as an IRR? 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(