The new IPCC report comes out today. You may feel any number of things: anxiety, fear, anger, numbness, grief, determination, hope. If you’re overwhelmed, it’s okay to not read the headlines. But whatever you feel, use this to feed the fire in your belly. Don’t let it go out.
Earth is our home. And as @MaryHeglar writes, “I’m willing to fight for it, with everything I have, because it is everything I have. I don’t need a guarantee of success before I risk everything to save the things, the people, the places that I love.”
I wrote this a few years ago, and it feels more true than ever. What can we learn from musk ox? 1) When things are tough, stand firm. 2) Protect the vulnerable. 3) We are more powerful together.
If you want to do something, start here: call the people who represent you and tell them how you feel. Demand climate action. Here’s a helpful guide for those in the US.
Then think about what comes next. Make a list with your family, your roommates, or your bestie three states away. Bring someone in. Don’t do it alone. Start with what you can do, today, and work your way up to what’s harder. Find out who’s doing climate work locally. Pitch in.
We need writers, activists, teachers, musicians. We need moms and kids and scientists. We need grandparents, churches, and people running for office. We need doctors, lawyers, farmers, and engineers.
We need YOU.
I’m glad you’re here.
We’ll do this, together.
P.S. The trolls and bots are already out in force today, going after posts about the IPCC and climate change.
Remember: in the US, “dismissives” are 9% of the population, and falling. Don’t engage. Report and block. Use your energy where it counts: on the people in power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There’s a plethora of stories coming out that are framing climate change as something no one was talking about until recently. Pardon my language, but that’s some fucked up revisionism.
Maybe folks in power want to absolve themselves from their inaction, or media outlets feel guilty for not giving climate change the coverage it deserved for decades, but somehow we blew right past “this is what we’ve been warning about” to “if only we’d been warned!?”
Setting aside the fact that we’ve known about the physics of CO2 warming the planet since > Eunice Foote (1865), Arrhenius (1896) et al, a US presidents’ advisory council raised concerns about the greenhouse effect in 1965. Wally Broecker used the term “global warming” in 1975.
Apparently I'm an "overpopulation denier" for pointing out the fact that consumption is the real problem, and that population anxiety is deeply rooted in racism and can lead to ecofascism. It's amazing how much people will cling to harmful ideas even when the data say otherwise.
For folk who would like to learn more, some links to help:
I really liked @EricHolthaus newsletter today, which connected me with this important essay I missed: "How can we make sure that climate anxiety is harnessed for climate justice?" scientificamerican.com/article/the-un…
I'm excited to share our new paper, led by @erleellis. By combining global maps of human populations and land use, we found that ~75% of terrestrial nature has been shaped by people for at least 12,000.
Our main take-home points: 1) "With rare exceptions, current biodiversity losses are caused not by human conversion or degradation of untouched ecosystems, but rather by the appropriation, colonization, and intensification of use in lands inhabited and used by prior societies."
2) "Global land use history confirms that empowering the environmental stewardship of Indigenous peoples and local communities will be critical to conserving biodiversity across the planet."
@ClimateBen This is incredibly irresponsible and harmful. Tacking “BREAKING” onto an unattributed statement is bad enough, but you’re also misrepresenting Gavin—he never said that. You need to delete this. What you’re doing is wrong, Ben, and I think you know better.
@ClimateBen To support your first tweet, you link to two papers about impacts to support your statement, and you misrepresent and exaggerate the findings of both (neither of which Gavin was involved in). Most people won’t actually read the articles, let alone the papers you posted.
@ClimateBen The climate crisis needs no exaggeration to drive action. But threads like this make it harder and harder for scientists to debunk doomist narratives, and as a result, we’re getting attacked by people citing our own work on climate change, who accuse us of downplaying the crisis.