People are really freaking weird about personal accountability and twitter's terrible UI. Exchanges I see happen a lot:
Some random person who wants to get in a shouting match hits reply on something I RTed/someone's response to a post I made/someone's response to THAT and starts
shouting back and forth with someone, usually a scumbag I blocked when they first showed up to make it harder for them to rally in other scumbags/optimize the visibility on their scumbaggery.
I pull this person aside and say "hey, if you're going to continue that conversation,
tag me the hell out of it please?"
And then they get all angry and start shouting "I never tagged you in!" and bla bla bla and no, you did. Like, you didn't go out of your way to do it, but that's the default terrible UI of twitter. When you hit the reply button, above the prompt
it says "Replying to..." and a list of every possible @, and in order to display the same basic civil manners of not being the jerk who hits the Reply All button when responding to an e-mail, you have to click that, then the uncheck all button, otherwise it defaults to sending
whatever you type to all of those random people, most of whom you probably don't actively don't want to send it to, and don't want to see what you have to say. It's annoying and not terribly good design that it works that way (and indeed, most people seem to prefer the previous
UI where all the recipients appeared in the message field, eating into your character limit, and you had to delete the 20 you don't want to even fit the message), but that's the system, and ultimately the responsibility is still no you not to tell a couple dozen strangers to suck
on your genitals or whatever, because you were too lazy to not hit reply-all, and only wanted one specific person to do so.
Meanwhile, if you haven't done the thing I'm always encouraging everyone to do and just make a private list of all the people you want to follow and load
that up in front of the main page of twitter, logging into this site serves up a weird mix of posts from people you signed up to see posts from, and totally random crap that Twitter decides to throw at you, including ads, random chunks of the middle of conversations two strangers
were having 2 years ago, and other stuff that's none of your business. Again, it is weird and bad that Twitter does this. Twitter should not do this. But they do, and basic social etiquette dictates that you just kind of avert your eyes and keep scrolling by.
Instead though many
people see these random posts Twitter throws into their main feed for the hell of it, ignore the fact that they are from strangers, are on their feed and not in their mentions, and the dates on them, and proceed to respond like they are direct messages that were just sent to them
and honestly that's so weird of a thing to do it's hard to compare it to anything else?
Partially, it's like if you're watching TV and flip to a random channel, and then you respond to whatever the people on TV are saying like they're actually in the room and talking to you, but
when people actually do that, they're just shouting at a TV. Here, no, they are actually sending messages in real time to whatever random people they're seeing random recordings of from however long ago and that's just super unnerving.
And generally when you point out to such a
person that they are sending what is, generally, a weird aggressive message to a total stranger who absolutely did not in any way initiate a conversation with them, they will cite the fact that Twitter arbitrarily put a post in their feed like that's a counter-argument? And, no.
That's just the badly designed website spitting garbage at you, without the knowledge or consent of that garbage's original creator. It's not on them. You're supposed to just ignore it, and if you respond, you're actively being rude.
Of course, a careful observer will note that
even someone who DOES understand all of Twitter's terrible UI quirks and how to navigate around them, it's still rude, and a complete waste of your time to be sending angry violent messages to anyone, even the specific person you meant to, in a timely fashion based on what you're
responding to.
And honestly, that's like, 99% of what anyone has ever used any reply/comment functionality to do ever since it became a thing. So I guess ultimately my real point was that Web 2.0 was a terrible terrible mistake and we should all go back to having personal sites.
Also side note on this general subject- The other day some random nazi actually shouted some incredulous gibberish at me about having "so many posts and such low engagement" and while blocking and laughing I was thinking, wow
is this loser actually a Twitter executive on the side or something? Because WHO THE HELL ELSE IN THE WORLD keeps corporate-speak like "low engagement" in their bank of potential insults?
Anyway did I remind everyone if you do that private list thing you never end up seeing ads?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So the thing I find shocking with the various... things where you load up a website to have some random gig economy person go pick you up something at a fast food place or whatever is they don't just take an obscenely huge cut, they take a ton of different obscenely huge cuts at
every step and I think everyone involved sees how much they're being gouged they figure that must be it.
The last time I tried to use one, I just had no food at all, so I'm like, where's a good fast food deal? And found something where normally you go to the drivethrough and you
get like 4 little bits of chicken for like, I dunno, $2.50-$4? Anyway here the price is like, double that. And I just got curious and pulled up the menu online and yeah, the price of everything is double, so OK, you're paying the full price to both the food place and the company.
Earlier this week I was in a weird position of trying to explain to someone who seemed to be in a good place what the deal was about a headline making Olympic win by an openly trans person, because the person in question is nonbinary, and turns out when the overwhelming majority
of exposure most people get to the very concept that trans people exist at all comes exclusively from propaganda that specifically seeks to demonize trans women and makes a conscious effort to hide that trans men and non-binary people even exist because they undermine arguments,
people are rather understandably TOTALLY FREAKING LOST when, you know, a nonbinary person wins a gold in the Olympics.
So, yeah, before I get too deep into my 102 rambling here, a football/soccer player from Canada named Quinn won a gold medal at the Olympics, after having come
Today seems like a good day to remind everyone that when a person holding an important government office like, say, senator, repeatedly proves to be a terrible person and does not reflect your values, you have the ability to nominate someone else to run against them when their
term is almost up. More to the point I would like to remind people that there are these things called primaries, where if, oh, the deeply entrenched self-absorbed loser you want gone is already a member of the party your would-be replacement belongs to, you have a vote before the
main vote to maybe go "hey, it'd be much better if the party supports this other person as one of the candidates in this upcoming election instead of this loser who sucks and is doing a bad job." And then they have to either not seek to keep the job or take that D off and go I.
Yesterday I was talking to a friend and somehow we got into arcades and private pseudo-arcades and pinball and such, and looking at various venues, and I stumbled across this random "article" (which was like, 4 sentences and a single image formatted like it was an article) about
one person's setup spent at least half of that very brief word count rambling about how it's the sort of thing most people would find really embarrassing/would have gotten you beaten up at school and I just have to ask.
How the hell did this utterly ridiculous lie get started?
Like, I get the weird collective fiction that D&D is/was a weird game for nerds and you got shoved into lockers in school for playing it. That one isn't an accurate representation of reality either, but the "weird game for nerds" bit is hard to argue against, and there WAS the
Somewhat adjacent to The Topics of the Day seems to be the fact that networking/job-hunting/career advancement within games (both video and tabletop) primarily happens in bars, strip clubs, and the hotel rooms people head to after leaving the former, and the obvious limits these
place on women's ability to survive in the industry (and several others for the matter).
And this is absolutely true. What's also true though is that this also excludes the hell out of anyone else who find themselves on the outside of such... let's say "social activities," and
framing it specifically around the impact on "women," and looking for solutions just from that end totally fail to address that.
Like, hey, a nice clear example I can pull from my own life. First time I hit a major industry event while I was properly out as trans, on HRT, etc. I
Seeing a lot of people suggesting that people avoid playing or especially streaming any of their games tomorrow to coincide with the planned #ActiBlizzWalkout but in all seriousness, you should make that a permanent break not a one-day thing.
There are other MMOs out there, and
I think at this point every single one is free, or free up to a certain level cap, so feel free to try a few and find one that gets its hooks in you.
If you're a Diablo junkie, you similarly have an absurd abundance of options. Path of Exile is basically the same game, and free.
If you're an RTS junkie, that's a much less active genre, but maybe try one of these? slant.co/topics/9373/~-…
If you need some sort of character-choice-based arena shooter, Team Fortress 2 never went anywhere and is still free. And if you specifically want a superhero theme you