Conclusive proof that the “YouTube stuff” this poor guy was brainwashed by came from @BretWeinstein: he shared Bret’s antivaxx “How to save the world podcast” on his Facebook page:
Bret Weinstein, ladies and gentlemen: Vaccines open holes in your brain with toxic spike.
Also @BretWeinstein: draws parallels between long COVID and "post vaccines syndrome".
Quote (split up):
"Now, the fact is, the components of the vaccine do not stay in the injection site.
"And the spike proteins do not stay locked to the cell surface.
Maybe some of them do, but many of them seem to float around the body, so we have this molecule which is based on a COVID molecule or SARS-CoV-2 molecule that is cytotoxic, that circulates around the body.
"The evidence is that it actually shreds the blood-brain barrier. So, it opens up holes into the brain.
So, you know, when you're talking about long COVID post-vaccine syndrome and these people have brain fog and other cognitive disabilities, it makes sense that
Ok, I am having trouble reconciling their abstract and their data - could someone double check? They claim "memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency ... than antibodies elicited by vaccination."
"memory antibodies obtained from convalescent individuals showed improved neutralizing activity between 1.33 and 6.2 months with IC50 of 171 ng/ml to 116 ng/ml (Fig. 3f)"
BUT
The vaccine-generated neutralizing titers are as follows:
"There was no further improvement in neutralizing activity of the monoclonal antibodies obtained between 2 and 5 months after vaccination (IC50 140 vs. 144 ng/ml, Fig. 3f)."
Eric makes a lot of sense from a position of a layman. The US public health agencies have totally FUBARed their trust and communication with people.
But from the position of someone with an understanding of the underlying science and drug development pathways, there are enough data to make highly informed inferences on vaccine safety and IVM’s lack of efficacy from first principles.
No trust is required, just the ability to analyze and synthesize data. Those data are distributed worldwide, so unless you think there is a worldwide conspiracy to suppress vaccine dangers and drug repurposing efforts, you can just mine those data to make your own conclusions.
The infection mortality rate in kids is about 0.001%. Yes, that’s quite low but it’s still way higher than 0. Why risk your child’s life? Why risk them getting long Covid symptoms or yet unknown long term symptoms?
Death rate in kids from vaccines? ZERO. No kids have died —
— and in the US they’ve already administered 10.2M doses in kids 5-18 and 14.6 doses in people aged 18-24. How many deaths reported for those age categories? Zero.
Is it obvious yet why we should vaccinate all ages?
Wait a minute. Could it be that the Carvallo study was initially sponsored by this Austrian company selling carrageenan spray? Their investor pitch deck references the Carvallo study and some other studies of their branded carrageenan spray in Argentina.
They also seem to have ran an RCT on just their carrageenan (without IVM) in Argentina. Maybe they ran it and it showed no efficacy and *that* is why Carvallo then said carageenan is irrelevant?