Thread: An Oireachtas staff member had to change the route they walked to their office because a TD on their floor never wore a mask.
“It is especially difficult when the individual is an elected member of the Dáil and the prospect of confronting him … is an intimidating one.”
Oireachtas staff members tasked with monitoring compliance with Covid-19 public health guidelines are taking “abuse and hostility”.
Many ignore the advice, point to somebody else and ask why they’re being singled out, while some are simply “hostile or dismissive”
A frankly despicable incident on escalators at Convention Centre.
TDs asked to socially distance as they're leaving. One said: “Sure what difference does it make, we haven’t got it.”
They then changed their mind: “We’ve all had it at this stage. It’s been here since Christmas.”
No screens, no masks, no social distancing.
“Any time I have passed through their areas of Leinster House 2000 there seems to be several persons in the office, close together and no sign of screens, masks or distancing."
Five hours in the Convention Centre – twenty separate breaches recorded, and this was the tip of the iceberg.
Masks under the chin, jostling of shoulders, with one of the Covid-19 compliance officers being asked who they were and what their role was.
A plea for help from the Covid-19 compliance team working at Convention Centre trying to monitor the public health guidelines.
“The disrespect we are receiving when we are risking our health & lives trying to provide a level of protection for Members and Staff is unacceptable.”
The Oireachtas are told again of the unacceptable disrespect Covid compliance staff were on the receiving end of.
“There is a cohort of Members in particular who simply do not care what we say to them … or how often we say it to them.”
“Non-compliance is rampant” while staff are being met with “abuse and disdain” when the try to do their jobs.
The team warn that the Oireachtas will be in significant difficult if there is a “super-spreader” event within Leinster House or the Convention Centre.
Members repeatedly ignored advice with one making a joke out of it.
A staff member said: “I told her that we were only two people and that we needed help in managing this.”
They didn’t get that help.
An incident where political staff from one party were repeatedly asked to stop moving furniture around a dining area.
The group pretended to do what they were asked and then simply moved back the chairs once the compliance team members were gone.
Another incident where somebody in Leinster House told compliance staff “to go report him and he didn’t care”.
Same problems with people moving chairs from the designated spaces crop up over and over again.
A member of staff deeply concerned after spending 41 hours in the Dáil Chamber in a single week.
“These hours of attendance are set to be repeated for a number of weeks into the future and they pose a serious risk of my exposure to the virus.”
A catalogue of issues in Leinster House. Members not using sanitiser or wipes when swapping seats.
Meeting ran over time. Up to date seating plans were not available while seats continued to be moved in the coffee areas.
Another typical evening of chaos in the Convention Centre.
These records had been sought under FOI by @RightToKnowIE.
A small number were released but access to most was refused.
Oireachtas said release of the records would make it even less likely people would adhere to public health advice & that they contained personal information.
We appealed this to the Information Commissioner.
The Oireachtas has now decided to release some of the records [this thread] but with names of those involved withheld.
We want identities of the Covid compliance team to be redacted … but not those responsible for breaches.
The Oireachtas has asked us to consider withdrawing the case seeking the names of those flouting public health guidelines.
We don’t think we should. It’s up to the Information Commissioner now.
As long as you remain silent on this issue and don't raise it with your local TD or Senator, nothing is going to change. This is about much more than political pensions ... this is just the latest phase in an unraveling of our Freedom of Information Act:
There are people within government who believe access to information about how our state operates has gone too far. Bit by bit, they are chipping away at it. Information that was once freely available is now refused. GDPR is often used as a smokescreen ...
... Separately, there are battles being waged on commercial sensitivity. Exemptions are being much more freely used than in the past. Patently absurd decisions are becoming more and more regular. Delays in answering requests by some public bodies are systematic and there are ...
Thread: Govt paid out €5.23M for new jet amid concerns that Taoiseach & ministers would need to travel abroad at short notice because of Covid-19 or Brexit. "Commercial travel in current developing situation may be unavailable, unreliable, insecure or too risky to contemplate."
Internal records reveal how government was given opportunity to purchase two jets from Pilatus. A senior civil servant said "normal procurement rules need to be relaxed" so that the Irish state could go ahead with buying or leasing the aircraft:
Business case explained that existing government Learjet was purchased in late 2003 and although expected to remain in service for a number of years requires maintenance in the UK or on the continent. (Incidentally, it's currently out for maintenance)
Thread: Every day for the past month, I’ve tweeted documents obtained using Freedom of Information and about the uphill battle we face to ensure continued access to public records. I hoped during government formation talks, it might provoke a public debate about transparency …
… It didn’t! It does however give a sense of what can be achieved through FOI, from release of Apple tax case fees to Covid-19 postcode data. It also gives a flavour of the difficulties: withholding of political pensions, unrecorded meetings + the state’s beloved “exemptions”
This is a selection of tweets from the last month, starting with the release of fees paid in the Apple tax case to individual lawyers. This practice had been ceased amid concerns over GDPR but was challenged by @RightToKnowIE:
Today is the second time Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has made remarks about direct provision not being "compulsory". Last year, he said the very same thing and said people could "leave at any time". A few small questions about that: irishtimes.com/news/politics/…
When he says people can leave, what does he mean by that? They are not allowed to go to another country in Europe because their application for international protection needs to be processed in Ireland. So that leaves really two options.
Does he mean they can go and find their own accommodation? Clearly, many residents cannot do this given they get €38-a-month in welfare and are not eligible for the housing supports that would apply to other people - direct provision is THE housing system for applicants.
Thread: Dept of Justice considered camper vans for residents of direct provision to self-isolate if "urgent response" was required. Detail contained in minutes of meetings of International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) which has been obtained under FOI. This one April 1
April 1: Dept wants to ensure there are no more than three people to a room in direct provision. Possibility of moving residents from 10 B&Bs around the country to different facilities is also considered:
April 1: The Dept says arrangements are being put in place for the transport of suspect or confirmed Covid-19 cases in their care. The "contingency option" of using the Irish Prison Service for transport is raised:
Thread: The Department of Health has refused to release copies of briefings and submissions for Minister Simon Harris relating to the spread of coronavirus. Some of these date back to January (including what I believe is the first one from Jan 21)
The Department has said the records are exempt under Section 29 and 30 of the FOI Act. The first is that they relate to a deliberative process (even ones from Jan???) and the second, well you can read for yourself - the most blurry and wide-ranging of all our many FOI exemptions:
The Department has said "the public interest would be best served by refusal of these records at this time". This is a mandatory public interest test that must take place for refusals using certain sections of the FOI Act.