1. IPCC relies excessively on extreme scenarios it deems unlikely. This is the fault of the IPCC.
2. IPCC is accurate on global trends in weather extremes. In key cases, finding none - storms, floods, met & hydro drought. Activists/media fail to report this.
There’s a powerful current of millenarianism in the climate discourse
I get it
End of times narratives feed a powerful human need
But IPCC report isn’t a sacred text previewing the apocalypse, regardless what you’re being told
You are safe
We will be OK
Sorry if this offends
Achieving net zero CO2 is a huge challenge and it will take much of the 21st century to achieve it
It’s not gonna happen by 2030 or 2040 or even 2050 but the world is well positioned to make it happen
IPCC says under current policies present world is on track for 2.7C by 2100
Of course there’s uncertainties in temperature projections, it could be worse
At the same time “current policies” are always pessimistic because policies actually change
So hitting a stabilization target consistent with 2 deg C is going to take a lot of effort but it’s in reach
You don’t have to take my word for it
Take the word of the scenarios of the IPCC most consistent with the century so far and current policies to 2040: osf.io/preprints/soca…
These say we are on track for 2.2 deg C by 2100
Of course coming climate changes, variability & surprises mean that we must up our game on adaptation
The good news is that society has never been less vulnerable to climate extremes
We are in 2021 in an enviable position to continue that trend even in the face of uncertainties
More good news on extreme events
The gap has never been larger between the evidence and media reports, advocacy messaging & political fear tactics
There have not been increases on climate time scales in storms, floods, m&h droughts
Don’t believe, me - that’s IPCC!
There have been increase in heat waves, some measures of extreme precipitation (not = floods) & A&S drought - again from IPCC
So yes change is real but at the same time not everything that happens is caused by or made worse by climate change
It’s OK, we can say it!
Last comment
There are incredible pressures & consequences for expressing the views that I just have, even though they’re firmly grounded in evidence & IPCC
The culture of climate discourse is incredibly unhealthy - that needs fixing
But I have tenure & optimism, a nice combo🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Some things to watch for in tomorrow's IPCC report:
➡️Are 7.0/8.5 used as ref scenarios?
➡️Has central est of climate sensitivity gone up/down vs AR5?
➡️Does report venture into policy (eg, carbon budgets, Paris Agreement, etc)?
➡️Does D&A framework get tossed in favor of EA?
Importantly
AR6 WG1 will necessarily be less "alarmist" than AR5 (which wasn't that alarmist) simply bc RCP8.5 was centered in AR5 and we now know extreme scenarios (7.0/8.5) are implausible
Expect lots of excuses from IPCC observers for again focusing on extreme scenarios
I fully expect a lot of euphemisms to be used tomorrow for "reference scenario"
Like:
➡️high emissions scenario
➡️very high emissions scenario
➡️worst case scenario
➡️continued increasing emissions
Changing semantics won't change the underlying issues w/ implausible scenarios
🧵Some might be curious why the IPCC focuses on the scenarios that it does
After all these scenarios are the foundation of the entire report's look to the future & assessment of possible impacts and the worth of different policy approaches . . .
The short answer is that the highest priority scenarios were selected for scientific purposes first & considerations of plausibility absent
Here is how the CMIP6 exercise justified its baseline (BAU/reference) scenarios
I'll be interested of course in how the IPCC WG1 treats scenarios but also, those reporters on the climate beat who are very well aware of these issues
Implausible scenarios of scary, alarming, extreme futures are often too enticing not to report on as predictions/projections
As I explained in The Climate Fix a decade ago, the core messages of the IPCC have remained largely unchanged since 1990, and I expect those messages to be reaffirmed by AR6 ... probably with better graphics and images
Those looking for radically new messages will be disappointed
This is a bit of an loaded question, since CMIP6 prioritized 7.0/8.5 scenarios (baseline aka BAU aka reference) so we should expect these to serve as reference scenarios (euphemisms: "high emissions," "4 deg C" or "emissions continuing to increase") in AR6
We shall see . . .
Does anyone know if full AR6 is released Monday or just SPM? I'd hope the whole thing