The world is heading for climate catastrophe. That is not overstatement. That is fact. But what can we actually do? What follows may seem radical, but if we aren’t radical in the face of the risk of extinction when else will we be? A thread….
First, we must make our companies account for the cost of stopping their climate emissions, and insist that they do it now. And I mean stopping those emissions. That has to happen.
We also need to accept that if a company can’t stop its climate emissions then it needs to go out of business by the time we have to get to net zero, or be run under strict government emissions control.
Alternatively, if a company thinks it can be net zero on emissions we must make it show how, and where the money is coming from to do this. This accounting is key to our future. Maybe 100 companies create 70% of emissions. They must literally be accountable now.
Then we must label all products for their emission content to the time of use. We need to know about this now so we can make informed choices. And I mean all products sold by large companies must be covered by this. Then we know what our actions mean for the planet.
After that we have to tax flights. When 92% are for holidays and a small proportion of society do most of that flying this has to happen. And it has to be progressive, by distance flown and by number of flights a year. It can be done because airlines know who is travelling.
We need to plan increased fuel taxes too. But it is vital that public transport be improved massively, and be significantly cut in cost, to make this possible. We can't just hit people with extra costs and offer no alternative.
After that, we must require the thermal insulation of all buildings, and that they become power stations in their own right. Homes create 25% of emissions. Those emissions have to be cut dramatically. Grant and loan funding is essential to achieve this.
If grants and loans are linked to energy use via utility suppliers it’s pointless to pretend that we can keep a domestic energy market going. It has to be under state control to integrate the support for energy efficiency required. Nationalisation has to be done.
The same is true of transport, of course. Buses need to join trains back in state control, and under state management too and no new sham management contracts are needed. And we need to think new means of transport too. The car is outmoded now.
We also have to rethink food supply. We have to reduce meat consumption: it may need to be rationed. And we must promote more veg based lifestyles. It's not that hard, as I am discovering.
Then we tax advertising, and make the rates very progressive: the more expensive the product being sold the higher the tax rate for advertising it, I suggest. Profligacy has to be discouraged. But we must also target high waste products e.g. cheap clothing.
This requires something else: we need to work out how to keep the media going without advertising. That's a massive requirement, and essential. We cannot depend on burning the plant to get the media we need.
Then ban the vendor of any product from selling debt finance to buy it. The desire to keep us indebted fuels the drive for growth companies pursue. I am not saying ban debt. I am saying stop its instant accessibility to reduce excessive consumption.
We also have to rethink leisure as a low emission activity. That's a big challenge, except for those of us who probably do it that way already.
What then? Close down coal. Limit gas as soon as possible. Stop wasting money on carbon capture. Invest in tidal energy, because it always flows. Make every building a power station.
Protect our coasts. Build new dams, for example on the Wash and to protect London, and many more places, whilst planning for the likelihood that nuclear power stations will be submerged if action is not taken.
And train everyone who needs the new skills required for this new economy.
In other words, begin the great rethink now - and take action to deliver on it very, very soon. There is no longer any time to wait.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

6 Aug
The Guardian has reported that fuel prices are rising this morning. That deeply annoys me….a thread follows…there are ways to tackle this….
Firstly, the reason for the price increases is supposedly because of market pressures. Actually, as massive profit increases at BP, Shell and other companies shows, that is nothing more than profit-taking.
Second, this is apparently intended to keep small market suppliers afloat - because otherwise they would go bust and the supposed 'market' in domestic energy supply would fail.
Read 14 tweets
1 Aug
Gary Neville, @GNev2, suggested we need a peaceful revolution yesterday. It’s not the usual call for an ex Manchester United player who is now a football commentator. But was he right to do so? A short thread….
I am not by inclination revolutionary. But we need to change our head of state.

And we need to be rid of the House of Lords.

We need electoral reform - because first past the post is nothing like democracy now.
We need to respect the right of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to choose their own futures.

And we need to revive local decision making, and democracy.

Education needs to be back under state control, and not that of private academies.
Read 12 tweets
25 Jul
According to press reports this morning 'Britain faces ‘decades of financial risk’ as £370bn pandemic bill mounts'. The headlines seem very familiar: they looks like debt paranoia. But is that true? A short thread....
The headlines are pretty universal. The Observer is guilty of the one that I quote. theguardian.com/world/2021/jul…
What the reports are referring to are two publications from the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee this morning. Both relate to the way that the government has managed spending during the Covid crisis. committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/…
Read 18 tweets
23 Jul
The government gave some staff in the NHS a pay rise yesterday, and then said that the cost must come out of existing NHS budgets. It refused a pay rise to the police. It’s as if they’re saying there is a shortage of money. There isn’t. A thread’s needed to explain that…..
Once upon a time, before most people in the UK were alive, the value of money was linked to gold, either directly or indirectly via the fixed exchange rate we had with the US dollar. But that ended in 1971. In that year the dollar ceased to be linked to gold.
Since 1971 the result has been that all the money we have in the UK is what is called fiat money. That has nothing to do with an Italian car company. What it actually means is that all our money is just a promise to pay.
Read 54 tweets
20 Jul
The idea that national insurance should pay for the increased cost of social care for the elderly is hideous. It reveals that the government does not know how tax works, how the economy functions, or how tax impacts inequality. A thread……
The Times has reported that the government is planning to increase the national insurance paid by both employers and employees to pay for the UK’s social care crisis. As tax decisions go, this one would be terrible.
It’s true that we have a social care crisis in the UK. Just as we need more healthcare, education, police, justice services, environmental protection and much more, so do we also need more social care.
Read 31 tweets
11 Jul
The list of things that are failing in the UK is growing:
- The NHS
- Education
- The justice system
- Social care
- Defence
- The police
The government’s planned response is to cut spending and make things worse. How and why do they think that will work for us?
The government says that taxes will have to go up to pay for better public services. There is no evidence that this is true. Last year more than £300 billion of government spending was paid for by newly created money, provided by the Bank of England. Why not carry on with that?
Those who object to the government creating money to pay for public services say that’s because it creates inflation. It hasn’t for goods, services and wages. It has for shares and house prices. So why not tax wealth more in that case, and have the services we need as well?
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(