Still watching/listening to the #CyberSymposium when not in meetings. We have once again shifted away from talking about alleged evidence into politics again. They really need to stick to the evidence if they want a fair assessment by news organizations.
1/
1/
"Why won't they let us into the voting machines to see what is going on?" Good question but there are clear reasons not to share Intellectual Property with the public, ie the theft of it. They were talking about China stealing IP so it can't be both ways. #CyberSymposium
2/
2/
Also, third party independent auditors can get access into these systems by signing contracts and NDAs to protect the IP. The @CISAgov also has a solid breakdown of audit standards: cisa.gov/rumorcontrol
#CyberSymposium 3/
#CyberSymposium 3/
The #CyberSymposium "mock election" at this event is interesting to me. In controlled conditions any device can be manipulated so they can demonstrate how a voting machine can create a fraudulent total but, again, that is not proof the machines in question were tampered with!
4/
4/
I have yet to see any evidence of election fraud at the #CyberSymposium. I can explain in detail how I can break into a bank and rob it but that's not the same as video or forensic evidence that I actually did. That's what we need to see here!
end/
end/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
