The explanation of a "packet capture" at the #CyberSymposium is somewhat right. But the pivot into requesting the routers isn't neccessarily right. They're making the assumption that routers are actually logging traffic in this nature. 1/
Basic routers don't typically have verbose logging that is stored. Enterprise routers will. We can easily ID by model if a router would have that information. #CyberSymposium 2/
Also, if those requests from voting machines are actually going to the internet odds are their traffic is being encrypted w/ TLS encryption. So unless that router is both enterprise & can decrypt/inspect SSL/TLS traffic, they're useless to Mike Lindell. #CyberSymposium 3/
At best they might get an outbound IP address that can be ID'd at least partially. #CyberSymposium end/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
