#SMD2021 panel: RCCTO internally referred to LRHW as Army's "dark eagle." No difference in 34.5" booster for Army and Navy systems, except canister. TEL is built off existing trailer, and "took a known C2 system" for battery operations.
BG Rafferty: "we're going to have an application on the Titan ground station that is going to generate the calls for fire"— ML model will be "driven by the commander's high priority target list"
"The materiel domain is leading…and pulling the other domains along. And I think that’s the reality of the Information Age, of the 21st century—is that technology is going to lead us. And it’s one of the fundamentals of the Army Futures Command approach, which is...
...Let’s have an intersection of technology and concepts, let’s have one inform the other, let’s have a virtuous cycle of researchers and concepters working together so we can imagine what could be in the future."
"Our commitment, with the abbreviated CDD process, is to capture that initial prototype capability that gets out there. And then use that capability to describe what the objective capability should be. So that we free up that continued materiel development over time, based on...
...not just what our soldiers think about the equipment, and that soldier feedback, but what our units and commanders think about how they’ll fight with it in the future."
My paraphrasing: Panel emphasizes Army Futures Command philosophy on "soldier-centric" process. Instead of imposing big book of requirements up front, rapidly prototype a capability based on core operational need. Test to refine design and CONOPS based on soldier feedback.
Rasch and others note examples where soldiers pointed out UI inefficiencies in various prototypes which were patched in next cycle. With ERCA, Army intends to begin 1-year operational assessment of 18 prototypes in FY23, refining tech, doctrine, and organization.
And on LRHW: Battery will be 4 TELs with 2 missiles per, with an AFATDS-equipped C2 vehicle. TEL trailers are "already in inventory."
Notable upcoming flight tests:
JFC-1 (Early FY22) first operational config. flight test.
JFC-2 (4th Q. FY22) first flight test from TEL.
JFC-3 (Early FY23) "The graduation event...fully unit independent. They will fly in, they will set up, launch, redeploy back to home base"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gen James at #SMD2021 panel: As SPACECOM's mandate begins over 100 km in the atmosphere, "my team is in charge of perhaps the largest AOR in the universe"
Gen Brady: "we've been focused a lot of fixed and semifixed assets" but Army intent on pivoting to protect the maneuver force. Says European allies very interested in this capability.
Brady: Army AAMDC is focused more on interoperability; excited for IBCS, but in interim, Mission Partner Environment developed recently aids in passing info to allies, esp. legacy tactical datalinks.
At #SMD2021, Adm. Richard cautions against comparing stockpile sizes, because half of US stockpile "operationally unavailable" due to treaty constraints. Also asks OSINTers to keep looking for Chinese siloes; "I usually have to pay someone to do that"
Richard: China "soon to be the pacing threat in most categories," and Russia "seeking to solidify great power status"—points to Moscow's gray zone actions.
Russia "has over 2,000 non-treaty accountable" tactical nuclear weapons. And "has the capacity to drastically increase" its nuclear stockpile. "Russia has more strategic missile defense than we do; theirs is nuclear-tipped and they're improving it."
Dr. Shari Feth, MDA tech lead uses fun graphic at #SMD2021. In which the boater is the PM and the lumberjack is the technologist.
Feth emphasizes that the program side should have a dual-hatted chief technology officer and dedicated plan to aid in tech transition. Programs lack incentives to evaluate new technologies without bridge planning and people.
In panel, SMDC tech lead Dr. Michael Zmuda discusses future threat environment: "synchronized" and "integrated" attacks; "it's not multidomain, it's all domain"; focus on winning cost equation.
#SMD2021 the Mid-Range Capability will involve multirole launcher that can fire Tomahawk or SM-6. "We actually have a missile on the rail that can do offensive or defensive fires simultaneously."
RCCTO head Thurgood shows some photos of the LRHW delivery and describes the DE-MSHORAD shoot-off.
Slide on 2-prong high-end DE solution. IFPC to have a kinetic and nonkinetic element, which will feature the mobile 300kW HEL and fixed HPM.
VCJCS Hyten speaking at #SMDC2020:
"I wanna give the Army a little bit of a hard time...the Space and Missile Defense Command [name]—it's schizophrenic"
"Space is a place, missile defense is a mission."
Knowing laughter as Hyten discusses naming confusion with AAMDC.
Hyten: Joint fires, contested logistics, joint c2, information advantage are "supporting concepts" needed by joint force, recently signed strategic directive for services to build requirements.
Hyten: discusses service input/analysis of Joint Requirements Oversight Council process. Critiques "slow, moribund" DoD requirements bureaucracy. Points to Schriever and Minuteman, Rickover and sea-based deterrent as architects of DoD institutional change.
VanHerck highlights at #smdsymposium 2021:
-Defining integrated deterrence: “Deterrence is created every day using all levers of influence”
-To disrupt US power projection, peer adversaries are “clearly focused on [striking] the homeland…It’s in their doctrine”
-China recently demonstrated “very advanced” hypersonic glide systems, says will not go into further detail
-Missile Defense and Nuclear Posture Reviews “cannot be separate”
-“It’s unrealistic and unaffordable to think we can defend everything”
-Homeland defense should move further left and “into the information space” at the level of competition