There are four different roles activists and social movements need to play in order to successfully create social change.
Social movement activists need first to be seen by the public as responsible citizens. They must win the respect and, ultimately, the acceptance of the majority of ordinary citizens in order for their movements to succeed.
Consequently, effective citizen activists need to say “Yes!” to those fundamental principles, values, and symbols of a good society that are also accepted by the general public.
At the same time, activists must be rebels who say a loud “No!” and protest social conditions and institutional policies and practices that violate core societal values and principles.
Activists need to be change agents who work to educate, organize, and involve the general public to actively oppose present policies and seek positive, constructive solutions.
Activists must also be reformers who work with the official political and judicial structures to incorporate solutions into new laws and the policies and practices of society’s public and private institutions.
Then they must work to get them accepted as the conventional wisdom of mainstream society.
The following descriptions of the four roles include effective and ineffective ways to play them.
Effective
•Promotes positive national values, principles, symbols, eg democracy, freedom, justice, nonviolence
•Normal citizen
•Grounded in center of society
•Promotes active citizen-based society where citizens act with disinterest to assure the common good
The active citizen is the source of legitimate political power
•Acts on “confirmatory basis” concept
•Examples: Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela
Ineffective
•Naïve citizen: Believes the ‘official policies’ and does not realize that the powerholders and institutions serve special elite interests at the expense of the majority and the common good.
OR
•Super-patriot: Gives automatic obedience to powerholders and the country.
REFORMER
Effective
•Parliamentary: Uses official mainstream system and institutions, eg courts, legislature, city hall, corporations to get the movement’s goals, values, alternatives adopted into official laws, policies and conventional wisdom.
Uses a variety of means: lobbying, lawsuits, referenda, rallies, candidates etc
•Professional Opposition Organizations (POOs) are the key movement agencies
•Watchdogs successes to assure enforcement, expand success, and protect against backlash.
Ineffective
•Dominator model of organizational structure and leadership
•Organizational maintenance over movement needs
•Dominator style undermines movement democracy and disempowers grassroots
•“Realistic Politics”: Promotes minor reforms rather than social changes
REBEL
Effective
•Protest: Says NO! to violations of positive, widely held values
•Nonviolent direct action and attitude; demonstrations, rallies, and marches including civil disobedience
•Target: Powerholders and their institutions eg government, corporations
•Puts issue and policies in public spotlight and on society’s agenda
•Actions have strategy and tactics
•empowered, exciting, courageous, risky, center of public attention
•Holds relative, not absolute, truth
Ineffective
•Authoritarian anti-authoritarian
• Radical, a lonely voice on society’s fringe
•Any means necessary: disruptive tactics and violence to property and people
•Tactics without realistic strategy
•Isolated from grassroots mass-base
CHANGE AGENT
Effective
•Organizes People Power and the Engaged Citizenry, creating participatory democracy for the common good
•Educates and involves majority of citizens and whole society on the issue
•Involves pre-existing mass-based grassroots organizations, networks,
coalitions, and activists on the issue
•Promote strategies and tactics for waging long-term social movement.
•Promote alternatives
•Promotes paradigm shift
Ineffective
•Too utopian: Promote visions of perfectionistic alternatives in isolation from practical political and social action
•Promote only minor reform
•Movement leadership and organizations based on patriarchy and control rather than participatory democracy
•Tunnel vision: advocates single issue
•Ignores personal issues and needs of activists
•Unconnected to social and political social change and paradigm shift
Je, Kuna uwezekano kesi ya Mwenyekiti wa CHADEMA @freemanmbowetz kuoneshwa Mubashara kwenye vituo vya TV?
Mhe. Rais @SuluhuSamia katika mahojiano na @BBCNews umesema kesi ya Bw. Mbowe ni nafasi nzuri kwa mahakama zetu, kuionyesha dunia kuwa haki inatendeka kwa usawa na uwazi.
Kutokana na ukweli kwamba tangu mwalimu Julius Nyerere apewe kesi ya aina hiyo ‘UGAIDI’ na wakoloni wa Uingereza hakuna kiongozi wa kisiasa amshafunguliwa mashtaka ya aina hiyo tangu Uhuru. Basi itakuwa vema @judiciarytz ikimpa Bw. Mbowe ‘open, fair and transparent trial’
Kesi ya Bw. @freemanmbowetz ina ‘public interest’ kubwa sana. Ili kujenga imani na @judiciarytz uendeshaji mzima wa jaribio ‘trial’ ufanyike mubashara. Watanzania na dunia iweze kufuatia shauri hili lenye maslahi makubwa kwa demokrasia, haki na utawala wa Sheria. Ni ushauri wetu.
Ni maajabu kuona CHADEMA wanamjibu Rais @SuluhuSamia katika masuala mbalimbali ambayo ametoa maoni yake Kikatiba.
Swala la @freemanmbowetz Rais SSH amesema wazi tuache @judiciarytz wafanye kazi yao na kuhakikisha Haki inatendeka.
UKWELI MCHUNGU, hakuna utulivu ndani ya CHADEMA, tulitegemea wachukue MUDA kutafakari na kuyafanyia kazi yale aliyosema Rais @SuluhuSamia sio kukurupuka kuita ’Press’ eti wanamjibu. Watakuwa wanamjibu kila akifanya mazungumzo?
KWAMBA RAIS KAINGILIA UHURU WA MAHAKAMA
Ni dai lenye akili ambalo halijazingatia ’logic na facts’. Rais @SuluhuSamia amejibu swali la @Salym na kupitiliza kidogo kuzungumzia kesi ya Mbowe kitendo ambacho hata Chadema wamekuwa wakisema kuwa Mbowe kafunguliwa mashtaka ya kisiasa.
CHADEMA wanakutana kujadili mahojiano ya Rais @SuluhuSamia na @bbcswahili ili kujibu nini?
Tumeona mahali @godbless_lema ameandika kwamba @ChademaTz kitakutana kujibu mahojiano ya Rais SSH na @Salym, wanataka kukutana kujibu nini?
Chama kinaendeshwa kwa matukio? 🧐
Tunashauri CHADEMA waache kukurupuka na kuparamia kila jambo. Tunashauri kwa mapenzi yetu kwa CHADEMA, Rais Samia kasema kuna Uhuru wa Habari, Baada ya Uchaguzi tujenge Nchi, Kesi ya Mbowe ilikuwepo lakini upelelezi haukuwa umekamilika, tuache Mahakama itafsiri sheria.
Ukweli Mchungu, wote humu tunajua kwamba ni kweli kesi ya @freemanmbowetz ilikuwepo, sio ya sasa, Rais amesema uongo? Kuhusu swala la kujenga CHADEMA wanatakiwa kujitathimini, kuanzisha na kuendeleza migogoro isiyoisha hakutatupa mwanya kushiriki katika Ujenzi wa nchi.
Mahojiano Maalum ya Rais @SuluhuSamia aliyofanya na @bbcswahili na mwandishi nguli @Salym yamegusa mambo mengi kwa mfano;
• Demokrasia
• Uhuru wa Habari na Vyombo vya Habari
• Uhuru wa kujieleza na kutoa maoni
• Siasa bbc.com/swahili/habari…
• Uhuru wa vyama vya siasa kufanya siasa
• Uchumi
• Hali ya maisha ya watanzania
• Tozo Mpya za Miamala
• Kesi ya UGAIDI inayomkabili Bw. @freemanmbowetz
• Uhuru wa Mahakama @judiciarytz kutoa Haki.
Mwandishi @Salym ameuliza maswali mazuri ambayo yana tija kwa sasa.
Mwandishi @Salym amegusa kila eneo ambalo alipaswa kugusa kwa weledi kabisa. Kwa wale waliotazama mahojiano hayo watagundua kuwa Rais @SuluhuSamia amejitahidi kujibu kila swali aliloulizwa. Mwandishi amefanya kazi yake vema sana na amegusa maeneo yote muhimu aliyopaswa kugusa.
Tofauti ya uwekezaji wa hati fungani na masoko mengine ya mitaji kama Hisa
Hatifungani ni tofauti kabisa na masoko mengine ya mitaji kwa mfumo wake na hata faida zake.
Kwenye hatifungani unapata faida bila ya kujali uchumi unakwendaje. Kwa sababu unaponunua hati fungani unajua kabisa ni riba kiasi gani unapata kwa mwaka. Lakini kwenye hisa hujui ni faida kiasi gani unapata kwenye uwekezaji wako.
Faida inategemea na hali ya uchumi, uimara wa Soko.
Kwenye hisa unapata faida pale hisa zinapofanya vizuri na unapata hasara pale hisa zinapofanya vizuri. Kwenye hatifungani unapewa riba uliyoambiwa bila ya kujali fedha ulizowekeza zimezalisha au la.
I think there can be a collective activism. Maybe some symbolize the struggle for human's rights and Equality a little more than others, but I think it's absolutely necessary for the activists to be united in order to make the struggle effective,
instilling hatred and blocking other activists for personal reasons kills the power of struggle and helps the oppressor. No struggle for justice has ever been won anywhere in the world without unity and solidarity of the frontline defenders.
I think if we, say, if all of the major activists in this struggle for human's rights, equality, rule of Law are at, at war with each other, then I think it would be very difficult to make this social revolution the kind of powerful revolution that we wish to be.