I will say, though, last year advocates for remote learning spent a lot more time and energy trying to disempower parents that wanted in-person, than the other way around.
I have a list that involves a lot of school-chatters, disproportionately from the open side... and generally there has actually been some consistency.
Supporters of open schools who are generally school choice people are fine with a remote option. Those against a remote option tend to be the more leftier open advocates who wanted open because they're uncomfortable with distance learning (and homeschool, for that matter).
Not going to say I never waivered on available remote option, but only when I was worried that families would do the remote option for fear of Covid long after such fears were reasonable.
Judging by the numbers I'm seeing, parents are ready to send their kids back in large numbers. So it looks like inertia not a huge concern after all.
The last thing to add to this is that states with more robust charter systems already had and have remote options in place. West Virginia didn't because it's historically hostile to charter schools. But a lot of states did, for parents who want it for Covid or other reasons.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm probably not getting what he said entirely right, but blogger Dave Schuler once pointed out that east of the Mississippi and north of Mason-Dixon, almost every city but NYC that isn't a state capital has lost population over the decades. DC, of course, is a national one.
I can't find his post but here is his excellent blog (one of the best solo ones around): theglitteringeye.com
I found it. The claim was that they've lost population "since their peak" (which is kind of cheating, but pick a year from 1950 to 1970 and it holds directionally). theglitteringeye.com/downsizing-cit…
For those of you having difficulty understand why people don't trust the vaccine, let me shed some light on the matter. A thread:
Imagine you're a normal person, and you come back from your men's rights group meeting and you log on to a gaming review website and 1/
In ADDITION to denying the efficacy of the miracle drug ivermectin, the so-called medical experts do nothing but take a dump on the Alex Jones concoction you've been taking that have been helping you bulk up.
Yet we're supposed to believe them when 34/
The same media reporting on the vaccine is the one that lets you sign up for their paper online but to cancel you have to CALL AND TALK TO SOMEBODY.
1) What is it with the right demanding apologies all the time whenever people happen to be wrong. It's... not exactly a habit I see the right being into. (Like... have I missed the apologies for "People will stop caring about Covid after the election"?)
2) There is a lot to criticize about his pandemic response, but "he's a cretin" is not really a criticism of his pandemic response, nor is complimenting his pandemic response saying that he is not a cretin.
"Did you hear Joe got fired for sexual harassment?"
"Wow. You complimented him on his TPS reports. I can't believe you were running interference for a sexual harasser what the hell is wrong with you?"
As is often the case, caught between two sides on the masking thing with some folks arguing that it's a minor inconvenience any complaints about which are posturing and whining, and a lot of people who are in fact posturing and whining.
Mask-wearing genuinely hits different people differently. That you don't mind, or your child doesn't mind (or there are no apparent adverse effects) is great. Not universally applicable.
And for heaven's sake, masks really are not an avatar for personal liberty.
For my part, I don't mind wearing masks. I don't have to wear them all day, however, so I don't know if that might change my perspective. My wife does wear them all day and doesn't mind them at all.
People aren't good with "This is effective but not 100% effective" calculations but attempts by health people to compensate ("Since this is not 100% effective we need to stress how not effective it is so they know it's not 100% effective") just makes matters worse.
If it is the case that the vaccine is ineffective against spread and we have to wear masks to prevent spread, people talking about "But the messaging!" need to let it go. But...
if it's actually mostly about unverifiability and trust of who is vaccinated and who isn't, and conditional enforcement based on unknown status isn't feasible then just talk about that (perhaps using more simple words).
Phillip H explains well why I am so concerned about grade school in particular. I may be biased because my kid is in that group, but I do think if she weren't I'd be less insistent on doing everything possible to get her into a classroom. I think. ordinary-times.com/2020/08/20/eve…