Don't believe the FUD. @Tesla cars/solar/batteries are the best in the business and only getting better. And they're doing more to reduce climate change than anyone else.
FUD says: "EVs aren't *that* much better for the environment than ICE cars when factoring in production of the car and source of the electricity."
This couldn't be more false.
FUD says: "Teslas aren't any better than other EVs"
@Tesla's been doing this for way longer and they don't have their own ICE cars to compete with. Is it any wonder theirs are the best?
FUD says: "Tesla batteries are basically useless the longer you drive the vehicle."
@Tesla batteries have been driving cars around for *nine* years without a need for replacement.
Oh, and if you do eventually replace the battery (after hundreds of thousands of miles) with one that's from primarily recycled materials, your @Tesla has a new life because the electric motor lasts for so long. ICE cars don't last nearly as long (more on this in the report)
FUD says: "EVs just have a *long* tailpipe (to the coal plant that powers the car"
Thanks to the efficiency of the powertrain, @Tesla cars use less energy in the first place so even if you do charge via nonrenewable sources, you're better off. Sign up for energy from renewables!
FUD says: "Look at all these accidents Tesla cars get into! Did you hear about how unsafe their autopilot software is?"
@Tesla just shows the actual numbers. They're objectively the safest cars on the planet.
Oh yeah, and if you want to talk about standardized testing (instead of real world data), @Tesla cars have that too.
FUD says: "Look! Another Tesla battery fire! These things just go up in smoke randomly all the time"
The data shows that this is a big nope for @Tesla cars. You're 11x less likely to get into a car fire when you're in a Tesla.
FUD: "Tesla cars are for the rich only"
This might surprise you, but a Standard Range @Tesla Model 3 is about as expensive as a freaking Toyota Camery after 60k miles of ownership, with fewer maintenance and CO2 headaches. Oh, and look forward to the $25k Tesla soon!
FUD: "Tesla's only profitable thanks to EV credits"
Regulations say car makers must hit EV production targets. They can buy credits from other car makers if they don't hit those targets. @Tesla makes a fraction of its income from this and uses it to build more factories.
I suggest you read the full report if you're interested in more. Really good stuff in here that shows the FUD the door like how well @Tesla treats its workers, how it ethically sources its materials (like cobalt), how Tesla's energy storage helps balance our (unstable) grid...
... @Tesla's fantastic and rapidly grown supercharger network, water usage per vehicle, battery recycling, the future (huge) impact of Tesla Semi, how Teslas start being less environmentally impactful than other cars after just 5.3k miles and more.
I don't care if you love the car, company, CEO, or whatever. But if you care about climate change, nobody has done more to improve things than @Tesla, and you should thank them for that.
Oh, and of course question the data too because the source cannot be unbiased. But in your eagerness to prove it wrong with different data, make sure that data is recent (this world moves fast) and unbiased (you'd be surprised who's behind some of these "research" firms 🚗💨🌫️🏭)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What's amazing to me is that FSD wasn't even close to being able to do this just a few months ago. This is an illustration of the leaps and bounds improvement the FSD rewrite is over what's in my car right now. Imagine where this will be in the next few months. #exponential
Every car drives itself any time the driver isn't paying attention. It's totally bonkers to me that we drive around trusting ourselves and other drivers to stay focused on the road.
In 2020, there was a driving related fatality every ~26 seconds. We *need* autonomous driving.
I'm still convinced that my kids (8 and younger) will never need to learn to drive a car. FSD will be *really* good by the end of this year and level-5 autonomy will get regulatory approval in the US in the next 2 years. Maybe sooner.
I'm getting a LOT of github issues on my projects/workshops involving npm v7... I'm still on v6. Did v7 just mess up a bunch of stuff or something?
Just realized that v7 has been out for FIVE months. For some reason I thought it was pretty recent 🙃
I guess I should upgrade and see if I can figure out what's going on with it...
Looks like the best way forward is to make sure the package-lock.json version is "1" (generated by npm@6) and the install script should use `--legacy-peer-deps --no-save`
I wouldn't say this if this were the first time this sort of thing has happened. But this isn't the only thing that makes them terrible. It's one of a list of things.
To be clear, a bad companies can also help a lot of people but that doesn't mean it's not a bad company. It's exploitive of both learners and educators, implements dark patterns, and expects its users to vet the content for thievery.
We chatted for a bit... And then he had to put me on hold again. 🤦♂️
Luckily, the hold music is new and he said if we get disconnected he'll call me right back. I think this journey (of leaving etrade forever) is almost over. 😌
Hey folks, just want to remind you of the 40% off deal going on at TestingJavaScript.com. Here's a thread of what some folks have said about it recently:
Tools I love to build web apps with:
React
React Router (v6)
react-query
React/Cypress @TestingLib
Reach UI @emotioncss
msw
react-error-boundary @fbjest @Cypress_io
And a framework like react-scripts or Gatsby or Next.
And that's pretty much the main/common stuff.
I just use colocation for state management (that includes composition and sometimes context when necessary). Don't need anything else even in "large enterprise apps." react-query manages server cache/state super well 👍
Maybe throw in a styled-system in there for teams/consistency a well.