Share this page!

Lila Rose Profile picture
Twitter logo
11 Aug, 4 tweets, 1 min read
THREAD: Infants are being delivered alive and their body parts are being harvested *while they are still alive* for medical experimentation.

Incredible and horrific report.

foxnews.com/politics/pitts…
Dr. Ronna Jurow, an ob-gyn who previously worked at Planned Parenthood and describes herself as "pro-choice," told Fox News Thursday that "there's no question" the fetus would be alive during tissue collection.
"It was repulsive to watch live fetuses being packed in ice while still moving and trying to breathe and move, then being rushed to some laboratory and hear a medical student later discuss the experience of examining various organs of a once-live baby."
"[T]hese babies would not receive a feticide procedure prior to the abortion, because induction abortion after feticide can take hours to days… [I]t is.. likely that a substantial portion of these babies are actually alive at the time of organ harvesting."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Lila Rose

Lila Rose Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LilaGraceRose

Lila Rose Profile picture
17 May
THREAD: This is the most important abortion related case in years. We are long overdue for the SCOTUS to revisit Roe v. Wade & PP v. Casey—cases that have led to the death of over 60 million innocent children & led many women & men to lifelong regret. cnbc.com/2021/05/17/sup…
The Supreme Court must acknowledge what science has long revealed: that a unique and individual human life begins at the moment of fertilization. They must recognize that the arbitrary line of viability is an ever changing goalpost as science and technology advance,
and a child’s ability to survive outside the womb should not determine his or her humanity or right to not be murdered in a violent abortion. Every child, including a baby ‘pre-viability” should be protected from the horrors of abortion and the abortion industry.
Read 4 tweets
Lila Rose Profile picture
26 Sep 20
Amy Coney Barrett is a brilliant lawyer, academic, jurist, and mother of 7 children.

I’ve already seen dozens of comments from “progressive" reporters and leaders attacking her faith, calling her a “handmaid,” questioning her adopted children, and even wondering how she...
...could possibly be a successful justice because she has 7 children.

When Barrett was going through nomination hearings for her position as a federal judge 3 years ago, my own Senator @SenFeinstein grilled her on her faith & said,

“The dogma lives loudly within you.”
She went on to explain that she found Barrett “controversial” because "women really recognize the value of finally being able to control our reproductive systems”

She is, of course, referring to abortion & Roe v Wade

That is her concern: Would Barrett want to undo Roe?
Read 12 tweets
Lila Rose Profile picture
16 Sep 20
It’s crucial to understand forced sterilization in its historical and present-day context as a population control weapon, wielded by the powerful against the vulnerable. Low-income and minority women bear the brunt of this assault on human rights. Some things to know:
.@PPFA's founder, Margaret Sanger, advocated for forced sterilizations of the “unfit” — minority, low income, and disadvantaged women and girls.

Sanger wrote in her Birth Control Review that parents should “apply for babies as immigrants have to apply for visas.”
Planned Parenthood’s @PPFA advocacy for forced sterilization led to the decades-long practice of these brutal human rights violationsin the United States. In as late as 1968, North Carolina’s forcibly sterilized Black 14-year-old rape survivor Elaine Riddick.
Read 6 tweets
Lila Rose Profile picture
12 Sep 20
My response to @McCormickProf using Noam Chomsky to defend the so-called “right" of others to advocate for child sexual exploitation.
Chomsky's (& George’s) premise is false. The options are not either Fascism or speech without rules. It’s clear that we already place very strict limits on some forms of speech. Sedition, false alarms, defamation. We have those limits and do not live in a Stalinist legal regime.
Any society that still has its sense recognizes that certain kinds of speech war against the good. Just like defamation and false alarms, arguing for the sexual exploitation of a child – or the murder of a child — should be strictly off limits.
Read 5 tweets
Lila Rose Profile picture
12 Sep 20
“Unpregnant” is abortion propaganda.

It might boost the abortion industry's ego, but the harm it will inflict on women & children is par for the course from a movement that views women & children as the collateral damage of furthering its agenda.

liveaction.org/news/hbo-max-c…
“Unpregnant” is more of the same from Hollywood's languishing abortion activists.

Technology, science, legislation, & enthusiasm are all failing these activists.

But they still have Hollywood & are relying on it to purvey their propaganda.
Big Abortion knows Hollywood has the power to influence impressionable minds & that's exactly what Unpregnant seeks to do.

By presenting abortion as comical, Unpregnant wants to obscure the objective reality of what abortion is:

➡️ The violent slaughter of an innocent child.
Read 7 tweets
Lila Rose Profile picture
10 Sep 20
For those claiming that the filmmakers did “nothing illegal,” the law & case law is crystal clear here. The filmmakers & Netflix have violated Title 18, section 2256. The Fifth Circuit created the “Dost test,” a 6-factor test to determine if images are child porn. Here they are:
1. Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area;

2. Whether the setting of the depiction is sexually suggestive, that is, in a place or pose associated with sexual activity;
3. Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child;

4. Wether the child is fully or partially nude;

5. Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity; or
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @LilaGraceRose has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @LilaGraceRose!

Read all threads by @LilaGraceRose

:(