Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick tells @LBC she is “very disappointed” that @ExtinctionR are returning to London this month. She says she doesn’t believe London supports such disruption and describes it as “frustrating”.
She says police response will be “fair but firm”.
Cressida Dick says XR haven’t spoken to police “in spite of many attempts” and says they have been “disingenuous” on previous occasions, and not in control of their members.
“Why do police dismantle the awning above hunger striking Gurkhas but if you’re with XR you can pitch tents and have a big yellow boat in London?”
Dick says it’s not a fair comparison. Bylaws are different in different areas of the city and each protest is policed separately.
Is it time for Cressida Dick to go?
“I love my job… I’m not concentrating on gossip in the papers… I’m focused on my job right now. Even you would agree it’s a private matter… the conversations have not taken place.”
A lot of people piling in on this tweet to accuse the Commissioner of not supporting the right to protest. She v specifically addressed that point. The danger of relying short excerpts on Twitter, and why I posted the full clip below the tweet. What she actually said was:
(1/2)
"We will seek to balance people’s rights, they have the right to assemble, they have the right to cause a reasonable amount of disruption... if you look at the case law it is to be expected in an assembly there will be a small amount of disruption,but not unreasonable disruption"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: The Dyson report finds that BBC reporter Martin Bashir was "in serious breach" of the BBC's guidelines when he forged bank statements to convince Princess Diana to do an interview.
It calls the subsequent BBC investigation into Bashir's conduct "woefully ineffective".
It says the investigation, led by future DG Tony Hall, failed on 3 counts:
1) It didn't interview Diana's brother, Earl Spencer 2) It didn't properly scrutinise Bashir's account 3) It could not reasonably have concluded, based on knowledge of his lies, that he was an honest man
The Dyson report concludes that: "Without justification, the BBC fell short of the high standards of integrity and
transparency which are its hallmark"
There is a flaw in much of the "we can't lock down to save the unvaccinated" chatter at the moment.
If the new variant is as transmissible as we think, there are enough non-vaccinated people to threaten the NHS.
It would be locking down to save the NHS, not the unvaccinated.
Here is the SAGE modelling.
For a variant that is 40% or 50% more transmissible, which the Indian variant may be, look at the rise in hospital admissions if we proceed to Step 4 full unlocking (yellow and blue lines)
They're in the tens of thousands. Similar levels to before.
The answer is surge testing to suppress it, and obviously more vaccinations. But the more transmissible the variant, the higher the herd immunity threshold.
So it is not as simple as just saying "we shouldn't shut down society to save people who won't take the vaccine".
Oh God. I’ve just seen the tweet. I feel bad even continuing the pile on on the tweet. So I will just ruthlessly subtweet the tweet.
Those who tweet without knowledge of Northern Irish politics should probably consider the merits of not tweeting at all.
I mean. If we want to be really kind it’s not TOTALLY wrong. The modernising issue is a big one for the DUP. And actually if you replace Sinn Fein with Alliance I suppose it’s not a terrible take...?
Ok ok, it is. But it has potential.
If you want some proper informed analysis of “what all this means” for the DUP and Unionism, you could do much worse than this from @PronouncedAlva this morning.
In November 2020, the EU diplomatic service released the following communiqué. Now look where we are.
Quite apart from anything else, just last week the EU’s own Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides said the problem was a failure to actually use the vaccines they had. Direct quote below.
Why ban exports when you’re not even using what you’ve got?