An interesting article found in the Romanul American (a Soviet-aligned publication for Romanian Americans based out of Detroit), published on August 30, 1947 on "India's Sham Liberation"
"A great deception is being prepared in Downing Street. Throughout the whole world is being trumpeted the news that on the 15th of August 1947 freedom is being granted to India--after having been under the dominion of Great Britain for some three centuries"
"Without a full knowledge of the facts surrounding this decision it is possible that many people will really believe that a revolution has come about in the attitude of Britain towards the colonial and oppressed people of the British Empire"
"One can really conceive that there are some people who will accept British propaganda as a true fact whilst ignoring present day Imperialist maneuvers aiming at new Colonial conquests on the part of Britain"
"After many attempts to stave off the growing demand for independence of the peoples of India, the British government has conceived a scheme whereby a formal appearance of freedom is granted to the peoples of India."
"No longer was it possible to delay the rising revolt of the Indian masses-- who are aware of their economic destitution is maintained and aggravated by Imperialist oppression and domination"
"The victorious struggles against Hitlerism and Japanese fascism, gave fresh impetus to the demand for independence and freedom from Imperialist domination"
"The freedom enjoyed by the scores of of peoples living within the confines of the Society Union, was a shining example to these Indian oppressed peoples what life offered in conditions of freedom from domination"
"As new circumstances arise, the British Colonial Rulers have always devised-- in some cases too late-- new methods for perpetuating their hold on their Colonial possessions. The partition plans, as applied to India today, bear every sign of such intentions"
"The new Indian constitution was announced on June 3rd. Since then preparations for its implementation have been speedily pursued. its main features are the partition of India into two main parts."
"The Muslim demand for independence was originally a device, whereby the unity of the Indian peoples in their struggles for Independence was very often frustrated and defeated"
"Under the impact of economic, social, and political progress, these nationalist tendencies, actually based on religious creeds, grew to represent real aspirations, which could only find their completion in conditions of national independence"
"It is their demand for national independence which British imperialism has used as their new device for creating conditions permitting the perpetuation of British Imperialist domination"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A profile of Jinnah by Phillips Talbot, the erstwhile American ambassador to Greece turned journalist:
"One-Man Crusade Split India"
"Jinnah, Regarded by His Opponents as Unyielding Tyrant, Secured Separate Moslem State After 12-Year Fight"
"For Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the decision to carve a separate Moslem state out of India, approved here by the Moslem League Council, is a completely personal triumph"
"If chaos and disruption should result, the Moslem League president may have won a pyrrhic victory. Yet it will be his and his alone, whatever comes of it"
"The impending partition of India provides a subject for close scrutiny by policy-makers in Washington, who are concerned over the change which the creation of Hindustan and Pakistan will work on big power relationships throughout the world"
"Hitherto India has not possessed any independent influence in world affairs, although the frequent conflicts between the Hindu and Moslem communities and between each of them and Britain have had reverberations in other parts of the world"
In the aftermath of partition, a familiar complaint:
"India Embassy Calls Reports to U.S. on Rioting One-Sided"
"American reporters are largely concentrated about Delhi (in India)... therefore the picture they give is a one-sided one"
"I do not say that what they report is not true. But if you don't tell what is happening in West Punjab (in Pakistan), then the picture is out of focus"
"Mr. Sen said that many American newspapers 'are not printing dispatches from India which give the other side of the picture.'
“But one of the central decisions of the Nehru government was on this question: even though it sometimes did not abrogate its reformistic programmes, it decided to give them a bureaucratic rather than a mobilizational form”
“For the Congress leadership, clearly, the political task after assuming power was to demobilize its own movement, not to radicalize it further.”
"A heathen Hindoo by the name of Bipin Chandra Pal addressed the Moral Education Society of Chicago the other day as follows: 'I am not ashamed of appearing before you as a heathen.'"
"'Heathen means one who is not a Christian, and I am not ashamed of confessing that I am not a Christian. If I had any doubt on the subject when I left India, my two years' residence in Christian England and Christian American have removed every bit of doubt'"
"I am prouder than ever of being a heathen, as distinguished from being a Christian.'"
"Well, there is very little difference between a heathen and a Christian, if the latter does not keep God's commandments.'"
One way to think about this is to see "South Asianism" as a debased desi version of the "negritude" movement that emerged among Francophone African intellectuals in the metropole in the early-mid 20th century. 1/n
Negritude (or "blackness") was an aesthetic and literary movement that blossomed across the African diaspora, from Paris, to Harlem and the Caribbean. However, despite its lofty goal of resisting colonial domination, it was fundamentally constrained politically. 2/n
Although early votaries came from different countries, they were bound in the metropole by their shared disdain for colonial dominance and--critically-- the homogenizing effect of French racism towards Africans. 3/n