1/16
Why do we use a vaccine (BCG) to treat an unrelated malignancy (bladder cancer)?
Can infections really prevent/treat cancer?
Let's find out.
2/ This story begins in 1813 when Arsène-Hippolyte Vautier reported that patients suffering from gas gangrene experienced a decrease in the size of their malignant tumors.
An explanation (or even the causative bacterium!) wasn't immediately apparent.
6/ Based on the above, researchers began to study Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Old et al found that BCG-infected mice showed increased resistance to tumors.
In one experiment, the 48-day mortality was:
😀0% in BCG infected
🙁92% in uninfected controls
14/ Another mechanism of benefit with BCG may be Trained Immunity.
This is the concept that innate immune cells (e.g., macrophages) "trained" by one infection (or vaccine) respond with a heightened response to a second, unrelated, infection.
16/16 - SUMMARY
⚡️For centuries bacterial infections have been observed to reduce tumor size
⚡️These observations led to trials of BCG for cancer, including bladder cancer
⚡️BCG acts as a form of immunotherapy, leading to immune destruction of cancer cells
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More specifically, Pearl's study sample contained an overrepresentation of exposed controls (i.e., control subjects who had died from tuberculosis).
This led to an incorrect conclusion that tuberculosis is associated with decreased rates of cancer.
Pearl published a "retraction" in Science.
While arguing that "any serious student of the matter" would agree that TB and cancer are rarely found together in the same person, he admits that concluding a mechanistic connection "may have been erroneous".
💻Wilson disease evaluation in acute liver failure often not needed
@ebtapper and @ShaniHerzig wrote a great article in the @JHospMedicine Things We Do For No Reason Series on nondirected testing for inpatients with severe liver injury.