Unpopular and politically impossible Afghanistan take: It’s too late now, but we could have preserved Kabul & key areas, protecting Afghan urbanites allergic to Taliban extremism w/a very light footprint. This was the point of the generals who wanted to stay. Why stay at all? 1/x
One reason was to protect people to whom we’d made promises. They’re all going to die w/their families now. That’s at least an argument a politician can make on the stump. The real reasons can’t even be suggested in public by a politician. 2/x
Example: We don’t really have good domestic facilities for military training at a company or above level anymore. Afghanistan provided a low-risk, low-cost, live-fire training ground to cycle young officers & NCOs through to get real experience. 3/x
A SEAL friend told me how, when 9/11 happened, there were SEAL master chiefs who had never fired their weapon in combat. That is… not ideal. And before you go shedding crocodile tears for our poor boys over there, let me assure you: 4/x
This ain’t the Vietnam era. The guys who volunteer to be USMC or Army riflemen are exactly who you think they are, and they are not afraid of Afghanistan. Hell, they could probably have made it a volunteer-only assignment and still had a waiting list, if they did it right. 5/x
What does “did it right” mean? It means being honest about the fact that we’re not there to “win the war.” That we’re there to protect a strategic outpost in an ungovernable place, and for air strike capability, intel gathering, and combat experience. 6/x
When you tell people it’s a war that we can win or lose, the first thing they want to know is when will it be over. Afghanistan was never going to be over. I mean, it’s over now, but this could have been prevented w/minimal resources if the public had been told the truth. 7/x
All that said, I have no solid comeback for people who just say no, no, no, we don’t trust this batch of leaders to handle it in a competent way that benefits us, or even considers our benefit a priority, so GTFO, period. At the end of the day, I guess I’m w/you. Sad though. 8/x
Some good corrective info in this sidebar thread from guys who seem to know.
Several people providing correcting me on the first part of this, and their point is well taken. My source was someone who ought to know, so maybe I misunderstood his point about domestic training limitations.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with MartyrMade

MartyrMade Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @martyrmade

16 Aug
He also wrote an “impressive”, “visionary”, “optimistic”, book called Fixing Failed States in 2008. There was one good review of it that captures the madness of our foreign policy elite so perfectly, that I’m just gone tweet out the entire thing as a thread. 1/x
“The authors, both former UN advisers, spotlight the critical problem of failed states: countries where govts have all but collapsed, basic services go unprovided and terrorism and criminality reign unchecked - or even abetted by a corrupt and predatory state... UNFORTUNATELY 2/x
Their analysis suffers from heavy reliance on management theory, w/talk of “power of networks,” “flows” of information & capital, “webs of value creation” & business-school truisms (“underlying a sound management system is an effective supply-chain management”).” 3/x
Read 5 tweets
15 Aug
At least we had our priorities straight.
It really is bananas. The explicit purpose of gender studies programs is to train gender activists. Only an insane person (or a revolutionary) could see a medieval tribal society w/a state on life support and think, “What this place needs is more radical feminists.”
The USA has turned into a radically revolutionary empire, but people don’t see it. We use all the hard & soft power we can muster to completely overturn ancient lifeways in places we know nothing about, feel completely righteous, and blame them when the changes don’t take! Crazy.
Read 5 tweets
14 Aug
There's no nice way to say this. Once we left Afghanistan, the options were (a) Taliban, or (b) descent into the chaotic warlordism that pre-existed Taliban. The rapid takeover by the Taliban isn't a f*** you to USA, it's a rush to establish control before the chaos takes hold.
We built a sand castle, now the ocean is moving in, it's that simple. Don't worry, in a few months, the media will memory hole Afghanistan and we'll be back to forgetting it exists . Sorry. The people in charge were stupid, careless & lied about what was possible. This is nature.
I don't know how to tell you this, so I'll just say it: We're not involved in the decision-making process.
Read 7 tweets
13 Aug
No one cares about him per se, but the story's treatment is one of the clearest and most indisputable reminders that the corporate press is a propaganda agency, that that's all it is, and that it has no other purpose but to lie, obfuscate, and accuse in service to the regime.
PSA: People like Biden aren't in power despite being vulnerable to blackmail; they're in power because they're vulnerable to blackmail.
Imagine if Trump had pulled our opposition to Nordstream 2, then months later we saw a tape of Don, Jr telling a prostitute that Russians stole a laptop full of him doing "crazy f****** sex s***" to blackmail him, not simply for $ but explicitly because of his dad's position.
Read 7 tweets
12 Aug
It's brainwashing. CIA Handbook (1983): "The purpose is psychological regression of the subject (to bring about) a loss of autonomy." (Spitz, 1989): "The victim adopts the aggressor's view of himself, loses self-coherence, accepts view of self as worthless, non-human, etc..."
More fully: "(The victim) identifies w/the aggressor, who is introjected as a psychic attempt to control an intolerable conflict situation... (T)he victim introjects the aggressor's abusive/negative view of himself (which often leads) to self-destructive attitudes and behaviors."
"Under conditions of torture (physical or psychological) emotions and physical reactions have to be repressed, the victim's sense of coherence and self-experience are shaken and he begins to lose a sense of familiarity with himself. His identity begins to fragment."
Read 7 tweets
10 Aug
Some years ago I told a friend that, warts and all, America would remain a free country because it was baked into our culture that snitches deserve their stitches. That changed, and we went from 0 to mass surveillance, blasphemy codes, & forced medical procedures in record time.
When I was a kid in the 80s and 90s, nobody liked a tattle tale. Didn’t matter if you were in the burbs, The ghetto, the barrio, whatever. If you tattled about something serious, adults would still say, “Thanks for telling me… but you shouldn’t tattle.”
I’ll be honest, I thought that trait was bone deep, and provided serious insulation against some of the worst excesses of tyranny. Nowadays we’re a step away from erecting statues of Pavlik Morovik.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(