At the pool this morning, some neighbors were speaking favorably about increasing covid restrictions. I kept silent because I disagreed. I guess I worried it would hurt my witness to disagree over non-essential things. 1/
Later, at the ball field, I was talking with one of my son’s coaches and he launched into a rant about covid restrictions. I shared his frustrations and we had a good conversation. 2/
It later hit me that in each situation the other person just shared his or her opinion without a care about what I thought. I didn’t. This led me to a bit of an epiphany about relational evangelism. 3/
I’ve long been a proponent of relational evangelism; the idea that you build a relationship with non-Christians in the hopes that you can one day share the gospel when you have enough relational capital. 4/
To that end, I’ve found that I tend to avoid anything that might introduce disagreement in those relationships. My neighbors don’t know what I think about most things because I worry they won’t like some of my opinions and I’ll lose the opportunity to share the gospel one day. 5/
I realized today that this relational approach to evangelism, at least the way I’ve been doing it, has made me a chameleon. I don’t change what I believe around others but I do change how I speak and what I’ll talk about around others. 6/
This is completely counterproductive to building relationships in the first place. No one wants to be friends with a vanilla person who only has polite answers and never lets you know what they’re thinking. 7/
This thread is just me thinking through this for myself but I do wonder if this is a wider problem in broader evangelicalism. In our efforts to be winsome are we becoming people no one wants to know? It’s like the kid in middle school that is just trying too hard to be liked. 8/
Would it not be better to freely share our thoughts and opinions (without being a jerk of course) and let nature take its course? Some people are going to be naturally drawn to you and others won’t be. I think that’s okay. Invest in the ones you click with. 9/
God is sovereign. It’s not up to us to win everyone. Be yourself and let God use you, your likes, and your opinions.
“For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.”
Ephesians 2:10 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an excellent article by @brettmccracken, but I'm afraid he missed a step toward deconstruction that's all too common in many of these stories - becoming woke.
A thread on the connection between wokeness and deconstructing one's faith. 1/
Wokeness, at its most basic definition, simply means to be aware of and concerned about injustice. The problem is not with the concern about injustice, but with how injustice is identified and understood. 2/
In practice, that understanding of injustice is often (but not always) derived from Critical Theory. CT was introduced by German philosopher, Max Horkheimer in the 1930s. He explained CT by comparing it to what he called Traditional Theory. 3/
Critical Theory is the reason you’re seeing so much division in the SBC. It’s parasitic in nature. It attaches to real concerns by offering explanations that implicate systems of power. It shifts the concerns from instances of abuse/racism to the systems that produce them. 1/
Critical Theory turns any disagreement about the nature of those systems/institutions into evidence of the oppression embedded within them. Not every abuse case is open and shut. When disagreement over a particular case arises this is further evidence. 2/
Critical Theory doesn’t allow for any legitimate disagreement between faithful brothers and sisters in Christ. For instance, someone could agree that a particular incident is abhorrent without agreeing that that incident was produced by an oppressive system. 3/
“The real damage is done by those millions who want to 'survive.' The honest men who just want to be left in peace. Those who don’t want their little lives disturbed by anything bigger than themselves. Those with no sides and no causes." 1/
"Those who won’t take measure of their own strength, for fear of antagonizing their own weakness. Those who don’t like to make waves—or enemies. Those for whom freedom, honour, truth, and principles are only literature. Those who live small, mate small, die small." 2/
"It’s the reductionist approach to life: if you keep it small, you’ll keep it under control. If you don’t make any noise, the bogeyman won’t find you. But it’s all an illusion, because they die too, those people who roll up their spirits into tiny little balls so as to be safe."
Walter Rauschenbusch (1861-1918) was one of the leading proponents of what came to be known as the Social Gospel. The movement ultimately rejected historic orthodox Christianity in favor of social work to bring about God’s kingdom on earth. 1/
Spend some time reading these Rauschenbusch quotes and decide for yourself whether or not we should be concerned that we’re hearing the same sort of statements from evangelical leaders. 2/ en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Walter_Ra…
“The prophets were not religious individualists. ...they always dealt with Israel and Judah as organic totalities. They conceived of their people as a gigantic personality which sinned as one and ought to repent as one.” 3/