One of the interesting things about the @CRightcast podcast has been realizing just how interconnected many right-wing fundamentalist groups are with white supremacist and even white nationalist groups.
In most cases (IMO) it isn't a dark conspiracy: rather a natural consequence of the psychological building blocks that both movements share: authoritarian power structures, fixation on rigid gender roles, terror at outside corruption, and yearning for an ideal (imagined) past.
Modern American fundamentalism was a backlash against developments like "studying the Bible as literature" and "the theory of evolution" and "ecumenical movements in mainline Protestant churches." Over the course of a century, it's merged with reactionary-right politics.
The slow merger has affected both the political right —pushing the 'secular intellectual right' out of the limelight in favor of moralism, and the religious — turning pro-war and corporate/market-centric economics into articles of religious faith.
There have always been profoundly racist movements inside of the religious right (reconstructionism's close connection with antisemitism and Civil War revisionism is one example). However…
…this vigorous co-mingling of movements and "religious anointing of reactionary politics" has produced a much more explicit Christian Nationalism, eclipsing the lip-service respect for pluralism that liberalism saw as central to the American Identity.
Now, "rank and file" Christians on the right who consider themselves Not At All Racist find themselves aligned with violent fringes of the political right: reactionary "shock troops" like the Proud Boys marching with Charismatic antivaxxers at a Newsom Recall Rally, for example.
A lifetime of indoctrination about impure outsiders, the importance importance of deference to strong, God-ordained leaders, and so on have primed them for receptivity to other authoritarian movements, even if they were not already on-board with racist and antidemocratic ideas.
That's why monitoring these kinds of intersections matters, and why it's important that folks looking at them (and warning others) dig into the nuances of the various groups that make up these no-longer-fringe movements.
And — just as important — that study can help us understand where underlying strains of white supremacy (and open, naked racism) have hidden under the umbrella of Christian Respectability in our country, laying the groundwork for a new wave of "mainstream" white supremacy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Friends know that I've long subscribed to "bottom of the barrel" conservative email-lists. GOP PATRIOT NEWS and other fly-by-night popup "news services" litter the conservative landscape, firehosing ad-encrusted email blasts on the hour.
The reason they exist is well-documented: the conservative base responds to fearmongering and lib-mocking. And when they respond, their clicks and shares can be monetized. The system doesn't require diabolical propagandists, just profit-seekers leeching off the echo chamber.
Take this morning's email from "TPN News" — aka "Three Percent Nation," a reference to a far-right group that advocates active resistance to the corrupt, liberal federal government. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Per…). Mind you, TPN News
For language and meaning nerds, the actual ~things~ that live outside the vocabulary and syntax of a sentence but carry important meaning — like emphasis or rhythm — are called "suprasegmentals". In linguistics, "Prosody" is the study of suprasegmentals, and it rocks.
This matters a lot in digital content, because the push to make content more flexible and less brittle often means "removing decoration so it can be handled somewhere else." When done naively, though, that can strip away the "suprasegmentals" and discard real meaning.
It's like copying a bunch of formatted text and pasting it into "plain text" — a lot of what vanishes might be purely aesthetic decoration, but things like italicization for emphasis get lost as well, and that conveys actual meaning.
So, as @danieleharper mentioned, @kristinrawls and I Kool-Aid-Man'd into an episode of @idsgpod to chat about the overlap between Christian fundamentalism and the alt-right…
There are numerous fascinating (and deeply troubling) connections — we focused on the direct and explicit ones embodied by Doug Wilson's "paleoconfederate" flavor of Christian Reconstructionism, the stuff @kristinrawls has been diving into for @CRightcast.
But we also touched on the less explicit thematic and conceptual building blocks that the alt-right movement shares with broader fundamentalism in the Christian Right. The idealization of a "pure and unsullied" past; rigid gender roles and masculine authority/female submission…
There are three basic ways to approach content modeling, and I'd argue that each of them have _strengths_ but no single one is philosophically correct or incorrect. Each is just a place to start.
The approach you hear about when a content architect describes ~the process~ is what I think of as "platonic content." You start with a communication or publishing concept and iron out your content types, their properties, etc. in a way that best describes their essential nature.
"We want to do interviews. What _is_ an interview, conceptually? Well, we'll need a subject, perhaps multiple subjects…" and so on.
So, last week @beep and I had a fascinating conversation with @petermcreaper and @mkeftz about the work they're doing on @interplayapp; among other things we circled around the ideas Peter mentioned in his post about design artifacts… it's worth a read. pete.studio/notes/design-f…
@petermcreaper's thesis in that post is pretty straightforward: the intermediary design files accumulated in the process of developing a site — particularly one that's heavily component and pattern based — are disposable, temporary artifacts and not the "source of truth."
It's a thing @gregddunlap and I talked about over the years WRT content models — it's fascinating to (again!) see similarities popping up. With content, you accumulate an endless pile of spreadsheets and similar docs to iron out types, properties, relationships, and so on.
Here to say once again that Screaming Frog SEO is an amazing nuclear-powered chainsaw of a tool for web work.
Its out of box config is geared towards SEO optimization (naturally, given the name) — making sure all your pages have decent metadata, stuff like that. But learning how it does what it does and configuring it to your needs turns it into something much, much more.
Most CMSs leave some default CSS classes or IDs in their markup to indicate template or content types used when rendering a page — Screaming Frog lets you run custom regexes during its crawl to extract those, generating a pre-categorized list of what content type each page is.