Friends know that I've long subscribed to "bottom of the barrel" conservative email-lists. GOP PATRIOT NEWS and other fly-by-night popup "news services" litter the conservative landscape, firehosing ad-encrusted email blasts on the hour.
The reason they exist is well-documented: the conservative base responds to fearmongering and lib-mocking. And when they respond, their clicks and shares can be monetized. The system doesn't require diabolical propagandists, just profit-seekers leeching off the echo chamber.
Take this morning's email from "TPN News" — aka "Three Percent Nation," a reference to a far-right group that advocates active resistance to the corrupt, liberal federal government. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Per…). Mind you, TPN News
Like most of these sites, it has no fixed identity. The domain (threepercentnation dot com) was registered in 2014, and despite an "archive" of news stories going back to 2014, seems to have spent most of its life as a GoDaddy parking page.
At some point it was a half-hearted online store with one product: 3%er sticker packs (again, thanks archive.org), but now it's an ad-encrusted wordpress site.
To the uninformed or confused observer it looks like an ugly but nondescript news site; but it's absolutely typical of the ocean of bottom-feeder sites in the conservative rage-to-clicks ecosystem.
So, I promised Vaccine Disinformation.
This morning's email had an alarming headline: "WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO THE VAXXED IN THE NEXT THREE MONTHS IS HORRIFYING!" Again, it's typical of the genre: vague but terrifying, or vague but infuriating, or vague but schadenfreudey.
The email itself is a firehose of ads and clickbait stories, but the headline re-appears, with no additional information but situated comfortably amongst other appeals to conservative hot-buttons of the moment. A few years ago, it was wall-to-wall Benghazi. Now it's vaccines.
Clicking through to the site itself is an adventure in "how many ad delivery systems can be backed into a single HTML payload" — I count four separate ad networks and a request to send web push notifications before the site's logo even loads.
The "news story," once it loads, reads like a bad rehash of a Facebook post: Vague comments about "the rush to vaccinate" and "no one knows what's in it" that are familiar to anyone who watched the pre-COVID antivax movement.
Also… ads. Lots of ads. Roughly every 2-3 sentences.
It announces, without proof, that one in three vaccinated people only receive a saline placebo. "Maybe you got the PLACEBO? How do you know??!?!" it asks the reader.
Also? Horny Girls Are Looking For Men Over 21. CLICK HERE.
It repeats an easily-debunked claim about blood banks refusing the vaccinated (see redcrossblood.org/local-homepage…). "If you think that isn't true, GIVE IT A TRY!" the TPN post shouts.
The "article" wraps up with some half-hearted appeals to ignorance and fear: "If doctors don't know how to cure COVID how can they make a vaccine?"
Then, an unsourced claim that "top doctors claim YOUR vaccinated family members will drop like flies this fall."
ads ads ads ads
The final payload — sandwiched between vague but dire warnings and another wall of ads — is a warning to "prepare yourself!" and an embedded video ranting about Agenda 21, one of the far right's "The UN will kill us all" conspiracy theories. (see splcenter.org/20140331/agend…)
I'm beating this particular dead horse because I want to make a point. It's easy to look at the site and say, "Wow, this is nothing but a pile of red flags with a warning on top, how could anyone fall for this?"
I mean… the "contact us" page is a *broken takedown request form*
What's important to remember is that I get dozens of emails like this every single day, from an ever-changing, ever-rotating mix of popup conservative "news" sites that take the conservative anger-du-jour, amp it up and reflect it back, then use it to season a page full of ads.
These sites are *innumerable* and built on the grimy, clicks-to-cash SEO/Spam techniques that have been evolving in the Internet's sewers for decades. The system doesn't require diabolical propagandists, just a copypasta churn of existing memes to fill the gaps between ads.
They benefit from the carefully-cultivated paranoia the conservative movement has encouraged towards "mainstream news," and reinforce it by flooding the audience, filling their inboxes and browsers with a cacophony of rage and suspicion.
And ads. So many ads.
Sometimes it's laughable, because the rageclick topic of the moment is something like, a celebrity saying Trump is a demagogue. And you can watch the whole aggregate grift-organism pivot in realtime to a wave of "You Won't BELIEVE DeNiro's HATEFUL Tirade!" headlines.
Ads ads ads
But more often than not, the relentless buzz of headlines and breathless "do you KNOW? are you SURE? have you HEARD?" copy is echoing genuinely dangerous disinformation, because that's what "reputable" conservative media sources are hyping in a slightly-more-respectable form.
If you're one of the people who's slid into that echo chamber, the issue isn't whether you believe that Three Percent Nation is a credible news source. It's the perception that LITERALLY EVERYONE is talking about this SHOCKING STORY. Your'e surrounded by it.
Your friend on facebook trying to explain to you how MRNA vaccines work and how clinical trials are structured and what the ingredients of a vaccine are? They're trying to shout over a storm, while the storm is shouting, "THEY'RE A DUPE!"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the interesting things about the @CRightcast podcast has been realizing just how interconnected many right-wing fundamentalist groups are with white supremacist and even white nationalist groups.
In most cases (IMO) it isn't a dark conspiracy: rather a natural consequence of the psychological building blocks that both movements share: authoritarian power structures, fixation on rigid gender roles, terror at outside corruption, and yearning for an ideal (imagined) past.
Modern American fundamentalism was a backlash against developments like "studying the Bible as literature" and "the theory of evolution" and "ecumenical movements in mainline Protestant churches." Over the course of a century, it's merged with reactionary-right politics.
For language and meaning nerds, the actual ~things~ that live outside the vocabulary and syntax of a sentence but carry important meaning — like emphasis or rhythm — are called "suprasegmentals". In linguistics, "Prosody" is the study of suprasegmentals, and it rocks.
This matters a lot in digital content, because the push to make content more flexible and less brittle often means "removing decoration so it can be handled somewhere else." When done naively, though, that can strip away the "suprasegmentals" and discard real meaning.
It's like copying a bunch of formatted text and pasting it into "plain text" — a lot of what vanishes might be purely aesthetic decoration, but things like italicization for emphasis get lost as well, and that conveys actual meaning.
So, as @danieleharper mentioned, @kristinrawls and I Kool-Aid-Man'd into an episode of @idsgpod to chat about the overlap between Christian fundamentalism and the alt-right…
There are numerous fascinating (and deeply troubling) connections — we focused on the direct and explicit ones embodied by Doug Wilson's "paleoconfederate" flavor of Christian Reconstructionism, the stuff @kristinrawls has been diving into for @CRightcast.
But we also touched on the less explicit thematic and conceptual building blocks that the alt-right movement shares with broader fundamentalism in the Christian Right. The idealization of a "pure and unsullied" past; rigid gender roles and masculine authority/female submission…
There are three basic ways to approach content modeling, and I'd argue that each of them have _strengths_ but no single one is philosophically correct or incorrect. Each is just a place to start.
The approach you hear about when a content architect describes ~the process~ is what I think of as "platonic content." You start with a communication or publishing concept and iron out your content types, their properties, etc. in a way that best describes their essential nature.
"We want to do interviews. What _is_ an interview, conceptually? Well, we'll need a subject, perhaps multiple subjects…" and so on.
So, last week @beep and I had a fascinating conversation with @petermcreaper and @mkeftz about the work they're doing on @interplayapp; among other things we circled around the ideas Peter mentioned in his post about design artifacts… it's worth a read. pete.studio/notes/design-f…
@petermcreaper's thesis in that post is pretty straightforward: the intermediary design files accumulated in the process of developing a site — particularly one that's heavily component and pattern based — are disposable, temporary artifacts and not the "source of truth."
It's a thing @gregddunlap and I talked about over the years WRT content models — it's fascinating to (again!) see similarities popping up. With content, you accumulate an endless pile of spreadsheets and similar docs to iron out types, properties, relationships, and so on.
Here to say once again that Screaming Frog SEO is an amazing nuclear-powered chainsaw of a tool for web work.
Its out of box config is geared towards SEO optimization (naturally, given the name) — making sure all your pages have decent metadata, stuff like that. But learning how it does what it does and configuring it to your needs turns it into something much, much more.
Most CMSs leave some default CSS classes or IDs in their markup to indicate template or content types used when rendering a page — Screaming Frog lets you run custom regexes during its crawl to extract those, generating a pre-categorized list of what content type each page is.