The website "quillette" has some good writers talking about some interesting topics. The following article is about some in Silicon Valley who are rising to oppose the current "woke" mindset that has captured many Silicon Ceo's [and others] in the business world.
My interest in this goes beyond sports and my own experience as an athlete and teacher. But I wanted to cite it here because it actually does relate to what I try to convey as a teacher.
I DO think that you should read this in the context of understanding that in the context of the larger culture, there IS a counter to this destructive woke offensive.
But , in the more specific context of developing athletes, the article has some quotes from these counter-revolutionaries, that I think are very much relevant to teaching athletes.
A couple of quotes help make my point:
"These entrepreneurs have always understood what so many progressives seem incapable of processing: building products that other people will buy requires not only hard work, talent, and a spirit of innovation, but also monomaniacal focus."
"As the Mission Protocol site bluntly states, “Mission focus is required to achieve difficult goals: It’s hard to build something sustainable and truly excellent if the project is frequently distracted by issues or events peripheral to the mission.”
Whether it is a upstart co. or an athlete trying to develop, 2 key points are involved.
The ability to really focus on THE key mission, and the ability to NOT be distracted by relatively extraneous values, diversions, ect.
Said another way, the ability to key in on and focus on those things which are REALLY important to development, and the corollary ability to contain/avoid distractions. Keys to development!!
As someone who considers himself first and foremost a teacher paid to help hitters/throwers develop, imagine me spending half that time [or more] trying to indoctrinate your kids with radical progressive theology!!
Would you, as a parent [or the athlete] think you are getting your money's worth by me mixing things like "connection", rotation INTO foot plant, understanding the dead lift posture ,etc. , etc.
Now. From Mel Siff's "symphony of muscle actions" to a more controversial topic. But is DOES relate to individual and organizational human development.
Look at these charts and see the changes from 2020 to 2021. There are some obvious changes, i.e., demonstrably fewer whites and Asians in 2021 vs. 2020.
[And keep in mind that this school is and has been one of THE premier schools as regards demonstrated academic excellence]. Why the relatively drastic racial change?
"One aspect of the delivery does not necessary dictate final result. All depends on how effective momentum is developed and transferred to the baseball."
I think these 2 statements are vital in trying to analyze ballistic/complex movements like throwing a baseball.
Based on long experience, I think that all too many tend to focus on isolated or particular segments or postures at particular moments in trying to determine causal effects.
While this kind of focus CAN be potentially helpful in really understanding causal effects, it also can serve to inhibit a good understanding of the actual "underlying realities" [Nyman].
As I have noted many times, Paul Nyman's lead arm disc model, in the context of a high level swing, was revolutionary. Until that model, no one had conceptualized a high level swing that had such, as I say, "explanatory power."
What do I mean by "explanatory power"? Well, simply put, no one had tried to explain, from a physics perspective, some of THE basic parameters involved in creating a high level swing.
What do I mean by this? Well, one needs to try to define how physics can help define a high level swing. Here, I think, are some basic ways to conceptualize and quantify this:
Last bit of thought for tonight [I think you guys should know by now, I maintain musician's hours wherein I read and write until the wee hrs.--don't call me before noon!!]
Some may protest as regards my non -hitting/pitching posts. Fair enough I say.
But try to consider my perspective. I suspect that many who come to this account are much younger than I am. I'm certainly appreciative that some relatively young guys are listening to some relatively older guys about hitting/throwing.
But try to understand that being around a while potentially yields a certain insight into the larger culture in which sports are within.
It's a truism to say that human nature is inalterably composed of both good and evil. History provides ample ex. of both. I want to cite a couple of seemingly small --but I think significant--examples.
The first is a singular individual ex. of the inherent human goodness and compassion towards those weaker and in need of our help.