The bullshit story about Russian bounties on US troops planted by the CIA -- to destroy Trump's ability to leave Afghanistan -- was laundered by the NYT, and it worked. When pro-war Dems joined with Liz Cheney to try to defund withdrawal, they repeatedly cited that NYT story.
The false NYT story that came from their CIA friends - Russia has placed bounties on the heads of US soldiers in Afghanistan! -- was repeatedly used by Liz Cheney and her pro-war Dem colleagues to block withdrawal. Listen to her say it:
Then, when the NYT story was proven to be a fraud, when their stenography service to the CIA got exposed, @BretBaier confronted Liz Cheney about the role she played in spreading it, and she lied and pretended she hadn't:
I absolutely still support both Trump and Biden's adamant insistence that it was time to leave Afghanistan. But the lies told by US political and military officials along the way can't be brushed aside. Biden's July 8 Press Conference from the White House contained multiple lies.
Reports today indicate that the intelligence community repeatedly warned Biden what everyone knew: that the Afghan Security Forces were a joke and would collapse quickly. Listen to Biden, from the East Room of the White House, lie about that on July 8:
Just **five days** after Biden's July 8 WH press conference where he claimed the Afghan Security Forces were more powerful than the Taliban, the independent journalist @mtracey interviewed a US veteran who described how those forces were a joke and a scam
How is it possible that Michael Tracey, on July 13, could interview a US soldier who *worked on the training programs* who knew the Afghan military was just "a big money funneling operation” for US contractors & Afghan warlords and would evaporate, but Biden didn't know that?
Even worse, that the war in Afghanistan would inevitable end in failure was well-know for more than a decade. It was an open secret in Washington. Yet the government and media joined -- yet again -- to lie to the public on purpose. Read this thread:
There were so many lies long told by US political and military leaders about Afghanistan. But the NYT/CIA lie on Russian bounties is a perfect case study: CIA fabrications to block Trump's withdraw plan, laundered by NYT, used by pro-war Dems & neocons:
Biden deserves criticism for those lies and, if you want, planning inadequacies. But he (and Trump, actually) deserve a lot of praise for something more important:
Biden defied the National Security blob in DC and their media allies that crave Endless War to finally end this.
The corporate media is "liberal" in lots of ways, and especially tied to the DNC now.
But in foreign policy, they are pure militarists: they revere military leadership and the CIA and *always* favor more war and imperialism. This is illustrative:
The easiest path in DC - for elite political and media circles - is to continue and expand war. That's how they thrive and are deemed Credible and Serious.
Obama vowed to defy that but rarely found the courage. With the withdraw plan for Afghanistan, Trump tried & Biden did it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There was nothing unusual about what the US did in Afghanistan: extinguishing an entire family and then getting friendly NYT & NBC reporters to ratify their lie that they killed terrorists but no civilians - except this time the whole world was watching:
One of the most embarrassing tweets from a major media figure in years, though highly illustrative of how they so often do the propaganda work of the CIA, the Pentagon and other security state agencies:
Anyone honest knows what happened: the Biden WH, facing rage over the attack at Kabul Airport that killed 13 Marines, was desperate to do *something* -- anything -- to make Biden look tough, so they wiped out a whole family to avoid a bad news cycle accusing him of weakness.
I guess I should acknowledge that it's unclear if Neera is lying as she usually does to exploit the ignorance of her supporters, or herself is just ignorant, but either way, the only way an off-the-record discussion happens is if both sides agree, not by someone proclaiming it.
“His sympathies for the Muslim World take precedence over those, such as they are, for his fellow citizens" -- liberal hero and MSNBC favorite Jen Rubin, on Barack Obama after he supported construction of a mosque near Ground Zero in 2011.
Today's DOJ indictment of a Hillary/DNC lawyer who spread lies as part of Russiagate is a huge deal. And it's absolutely true: the NYT & @charlie_savage this morning -- before anyone could see the indictment -- cast it in the most favorable light possible, as it if were trivial:
Most media outlets mindlessly spread the fraudulent Trump/Alfa-Bank story because they spread anything they were fed without caring. To its credit, the Intercept -- led by @samfbiddle & @lhfang -- pointed out the glaring flaws in the story at the time:
It wasn't just Hillary's lawyer who got indicted today, or their media servants, who spread this fraud about Trump's secret server with a Russian bank. Hillary herself endorsed and spread as her lawyer concocted the whole fraud in the first place:
The Special Counsel investigating the various frauds of Russiagate, John Dunham, is about to indict a Perkins Coie lawyer for feeding a fake story about Trump and Alfa Bank to the FBI and media, then lying by denying he represented the Clinton campaign:
The scam that Trump was using a secret server to communicate with a Russian bank was promoted by Hillary herself, and touted by media outlets led by @Slate. Like so much that comprised Russiagate, it was a total fraud concocted by the DNC & media allies:
In sum, a DNC-linked lawyer -- partners with Clinton lawyer @marceelias -- fabricated a Trump/Russia link, fed it to DNC operatives masquerading as journalists, had Hillary trumpet it, then lied to FBI about who he worked for.
Democratic Party YouTubers trying to dictate to @NICKIMINAJ what she can and can't say, who she is and isn't permitted to cite, what partisan box she must stay in.
It went poorly for @JoyAnnReid when she tried and I doubt it will go better for these 2 DNC socialist soldiers.
The only thing that enrages liberal gatekeepers more than urging people to make their own decisions rather than getting bullied into obedience is refusing to submit to their partisan prison. But since she's who she is, she can say what she wants, making it more dangerous still.
In about two years, Twitter and Facebook will just be Chris Hayes, Amy Klobuchar, Jen Rubin and Adam Schiff arguing about whether Nancy Pelsoi is or isn't more awesome than Kamala Harris and everyone else will be banned.
A few points to highlight about the above-linked video report we just published on the attempts by Sen. Warren & Adam Schiff to demand Amazon suppress certain books.
First, this is part of a year-long campaign by Dems to use their majority power in DC to mandate censorship.
There are so many reasons why this attempt by the Democratic Party to commandeer Big Tech censorship power for themselves is so dangerous.
Perhaps the gravest is that this is all about imposing a framework where dissent from or questioning of decrees from authorities is banned.