Judith Danovitch's researches how preschool & elementary school kids evaluate & think about information. In this article, she evaluates claims of "mask harms" and the impiactions, for cognitive development, of not seeing mouths, smiles & frowns.🧵
nytimes.com/2021/08/18/opi…
Daovitch admits that, though there is little data on masks per se, there is evidence from head coverings. “Children in cultures where caregivers & educators wear head coverings that obscure their mouths & noses develop skills just as children in other cultures do.”
What’s more, she adds, blind people still learn to speak, read and socialize.
Danovitch points out that “looking at eyes is at least as important as looking at mouths" given that by age 2, typical kids spend 2x as much time on eyes than on mouths.
In fact, Danovitch points out, children who infer thoughts and emotions based on eyes alone, exhibit greater emotional intelligence.
All this should really make us wonder why the anti-maskers aren’t at least as concerned, if not more concerned, with sunglasses and hairstyles that hide the eyes, than they are with masks. But I digress.
Masks, Danovitch says, also are opportunities to develop skills that rely on “ prosody, gesture & context” as well as “ tone of voice or a teacher’s body language”.
In addition, in keeping a mask on and in place, kids can develop the kind of self-control that helps at “achieving their long-term goals, solving problems and handling stressful situations.”
Danovitch adds that masks are practice at caring for the community and lessons in transmission that give children opportunities to feel good about “sacrifices on behalf of others in need”.
Surprising no one whose been paying attention, how children feel about masks is largely a reflection of how their parents feel about masks.
Which makes one wonder what the "mask harm" parents are saying to their kids and why masks can’t be like other hardships kids inevitably face where we often teach them to turn adversity to advantage.
At the very least Danovitch provides a helpful roadmap for parents interested in redirecting potential mask complaints to other skills to encourage: like those of emotional intelligence and personal growth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Loretta Torrago

Loretta Torrago Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Loretta_Torrago

12 Sep
Unhappy with the CDC’s paltry number of myocarditis cases attributable to mRNA vaccines, @TracyBethHoeg et al set out on the vast sea of VAERS in hopes of catching more fish by using "broader search and inclusion criteria" aka a bigger, but definitely not better, net. 🧵
Admirable if only for the nakedness of its ambition, the authors don’t hide that their aim is to “update” the CDC’s estimate,
or that, by “update” they mean “inflate”.
Read 19 tweets
21 Aug
This study by @TracyBethHoeg, @KrugAlli et al. reinvents the need for the adage "absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence" as a response to the authors’ novel approach “If you don’t have symptoms, you don’t have cases."🧵
bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjspor…
The study is allegedly about player-to-player transmission being contained by the protocols for youth ice hockey the authors develop. Alarm bells ring almost immediately when the authors introduce us to the study’s crew: a “volunteer epidemiologist”,
and other “neutral” parties.
Read 23 tweets
14 Aug
Covid minimizers, like @drlucymcbride, are like eclipses that cover astronomical objects. The disaster behind their obfuscations is still there despite the cover of misleading and often irrelevant “good cheer” they try to throw in front of it. 🧵
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
Implying the well-off and protected have nothing to fear because hospitals are only filling up “in states with where low vaccination rates” may reassure the privileged McBride seems most concerned with. Image
However, it belies the actual evidence. Image
Read 39 tweets
12 Aug
While @ProfEmilyOster denies consulting with @GovRonDesantis, she hasn’t yet repudiated her study. She should. The study claims to show mitigations don't work but has so many design flaws, even effective measures would fail her trials. Very long🧵.
nytimes.com/2021/06/22/us/…
Probably because they’re assumed to be the “gold standard”, Oster’s studies employ the all the signs of being Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) in which mitigations: mask mandates, in-person density and ventilation are compared with schools absent those same mitigations.
Oster’s conclusion is, more or less, that mitigations make no difference to Covid case counts in students, staff and teachers associated with schools.
Read 42 tweets
10 Aug
They won't stop will they? Despite the evidence that cases in kids rise even when adults are well vaccinated (see the UK), the fact is an adult vaccinated today is weeks away from providing indirect protection. They have no interim plan except widespread infection of kids.
Here is evidence from the more highly vaxxed UK, that cases in kids rise despite adult vaccination Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
10 Aug
No, @TracyBethHoeg, the article you point to does not claim delta is not "resulting in increased rates of in-school transmission”. In fact, it says the opposite. 🧵 Image
Speaking of the 12 presumed cases of in-school transmission for the summer, the article offers this: "By way of comparison, the district reported 2 cases of apparant transmission during the regular school year."
latimes.com/california/sto…
In fact, the article very explicitly implicates Delta in the rise of infections. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(