This Lex Fridman guy makes some compelling points in this interview with Rogan. I don't agree with all of his points, but the ones below? 👍
I don't know who he is so this is not me cosigning him as a person (or Rogan for that matter.)
But Rogan does catch something I didn't.
I don't know who he is so this is not me cosigning him as a person (or Rogan for that matter.)
But Rogan does catch something I didn't.
As I've said, the HBO series tries to imply that Ron is Q, rather than proving it. And Lex also catches that this is what's happening. The difference between him and me is that he seems to have bought into it, at least a bit.
But he doesn't think it's autonomous. I agree there.
But he doesn't think it's autonomous. I agree there.
Moreover, I think Lex does have a pretty good grasp of how Russia operates and weaves narratives for an unsuspecting audience. How notions of good and evil can be used to manipulate people, when built into a narrative that has particular objectives.
And Rogan does seem to have a point about the glasses.
Matter of fact, there have been numerous times that Ron has appeared without glasses, from his youth onward. Maybe he wears contacts or maybe he doesn't need glasses at all.
Matter of fact, there have been numerous times that Ron has appeared without glasses, from his youth onward. Maybe he wears contacts or maybe he doesn't need glasses at all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
