Classic fintwit: the importance of something is generally inversely proportional to the # of likes/RTs/engagement.
I’ve done my DD on this. There’s real anger and what’s more impressive and amazing is the unanimity of it.
You have staunchly loyal and proud of mainland folks as WTF about this as anyone.
How do you piss off everyone - from diehard “freedom for HK” types to staunchly loyal to the PRC types?
You extend quarantine for everyone … then exempt Nicole Kidman from quarantine. Then you say it’s “for the economy”. Then you lie about the fact she’s been out and about.
“Despite the draconian nature of the quarantine rules, they have generally been viewed as equally applied until the Kidman incident. In recent weeks, Mark Tucker, the chairman of HSBC, one of the world’s largest banks, was required to undergo a 3 week hotel quarantine.”
This headline is false/misleading - it’s the HK govt that is being ‘slammed’, not Nicole Kidman…I would gloss over this too if I read the headline:
Let me translate “Myth 1”: the Chinese people went from starving poor 40 years ago, to poor but not starving, today. Depending on who you ask, this is thx to CCP or the Chinese ppl.
Starving ppl tend to worry more about making ends meet than the right to sh1tpost abt Beijing.
Also, when most of your people go from starving poor to poor (but not starving)…people tend to trust the system, give it benefit of doubt, and expect a better tomorrow vs today.
Must read: “The Bush administration lied about Afghanistan, lied to and defrauded the American people —and its fraud has left hundreds of thousands of Afghans dead. This betrayal will live in infamy. The burden of shame falls on Bush/Rumsfeld/Cheney”