Here's a quick thread about how we know when The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius was written because although generally people get this right sometimes they're way off with the dates...
First of all, a note of caution, we don't know for certain that the whole text was composed around the same time, but I think it probably was. Marcus was a diligent student of philosophy and rhetoric and enjoyed writing. I doubt he'd have taken many years over these notes.
He mentions waiting for a baby to emerge from his wife's womb. Faustina's last child is believed to have been born 170 CE, so if taken literally this part is from 169/170 CE.
He mentions many deaths, and praises his wife, without any hint that she's also passed, in book one, which is believed to have been written last. She died in 175 CE, suggesting the book was most likely finished before that date.
He mentions enough time has passed that it would be absurd for mourners to still be weeping by the casket of his brother Lucius Verus, who died in 169 CE. So that part was probably written 170 CE or later.
He mentions writing part at the Roman fortress of Carnuntum and across the Danube, by the River Gran, which is near the fortress of Aquincum. So during the Marcomannic War. Archeologists have unearthed a praetorian's gravestone dated 171 CE from Carnuntum.
This makes it virtually certain Marcus was stationed at Carnuntum in 171 CE, so part of The Meditations could have been written around this time, or slightly earlier. The war moved east to Aquincum later.
Marcus was thought to be dying in the winter of 174/175, which precipitated the civil war. He seems to mention ill but nothing about the civil war in the text. So it's likely he finished writing The Meditations around this time or earlier.
I've probably missed something but basically, a bunch of circumstantial evidence points, roughly, toward it having been written sometime between early 170 CE and late 174 CE, which happens to coincide with the Roman counter-offensive during the First Marcomannic War.
It also immediately follows the death of Marcus' main Stoic tutor, Junius Rusticus, which I believe may have been the event that caused Marcus to begin writing The Meditations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In The Meditations, Marcus thanks the gods he didn't fall under the spell of a Sophist when he first began to study philosophy. He must surely have in mind Herodes Atticus, who was by far the most famous Sophist of the era, and a family friend.
Herodes was raised in the household of his maternal grandfather, alongside Marcus' mother, Lucilla. However, he was in Athens when Marcus' higher education in rhetoric began, although he was appointed his Greek rhetoric tutor somewhat later.
Although Herodes was a family friend, arguably the leading intellectual of his day, and the most famous of his tutors, Marcus doesn't mention him once in The Meditations. Instead of Herodes, he praises more obscure teachers, including an unnamed tutor who was probably a slave.
Freud held back scientific progress in psychotherapy by roughly half a century.
Freud's notion of the unconscious mind was "...the sovereign means for believing what one likes in psychology, and for turning what might become a science into a tumbling-ground for whimsies." - William James
People think "Oh back in the day there wasn't any research." That's wrong. The Soviets were doing research on psychotherapy at the start of the 20th century and so were American behavioural psychologists. Freud and his followers nixed all that because... pseudoscience! :/
🧙♂️ Socrates: If you love someone because they satisfy a need, like a medicine healing a sickness, then what reason do you have to continue loving them after the need has been satisfied?
"For if there were nothing to hurt us any longer, we should have no need of anything that would do us good.
"Then would be clearly seen that we did but love and desire the good because of the evil, and as the remedy of the evil, which was the disease; but if there had been no disease, there would have been no need of a remedy." – Plato, Lysis
Paul Dubois:- A young man into whom I tried to instil a few principles of #stoicism towards ailments stopped me at the first words, saying, “I understand, doctor; let me show you.” And taking a pencil he drew a large black spot on a piece of paper.
“This,” said he, “is the disease, in its most general sense, the physical trouble – rheumatism, toothache, what you will – moral trouble, sadness, discouragement, melancholy.
If I acknowledge it by fixing my attention upon it, I already trace a circle to the periphery of the black spot, and it has become larger. If I affirm it with acerbity the spot is increased by a new circle.
Some problems with allowing the emotion of anger to motivate your words and actions...
1. Anger biases our attention so that we narrow down the scope of our focus and selectively leave out information that would lead to a more accurate and balanced appraisal of complex situations.
2. Anger tends to be associated with a slew of cognitive distortions such as mind-reading, over-generalization, etc.
Edward Snowden: "The way to respond to [disinformation attacks] is through strength and resilience... the solution to disinformation not to freak out that it exists but to get your news from reliable sources and think critically about everything you hear."
Stoicism in other words. ;)
I've lost count of how many times people arguing with me online who were trying to downplay the pandemic, or make it out to be a hoax, sent me links to articles on Breitbart or some other nonsense propaganda site. CNN et al. are also woefully biased, obviously.