You really have to wonder what kind of internal numbers OF has on what its revenue looks like without the cut it gets from sex workers’ subscriptions and transactions and how much investment they’d need from the new funders they’re trying to land to cover it
Just seems like a plan that fucks over sex workers in pursuit of (entirely hypothetical!) VC funding for a business model that now seems like its meant to be “what if Cameo but de-personalized”
They’ve already rolled out a free entirely SFW app so that they can finally get on the App Store/Google Play. But to make this announcement before even seeing how much interest there is in that? Seems like a mistake!
“oh good, it looks like a lot of people have downloaded our app!”
[three weeks later]
“all of the downloads have stopped, we have reports of widespread deletion, and 98% of the reviews say ‘where are the n00ds.’"
Seriously, OnlyFans would have crumbled ages ago if it weren’t for the sex workers on the platform. You think Beyonce would’ve given them a shoutout on the “Savage” remix otherwise? And now a revenue stream for a lot of women (and men!) is going to evaporate for the owners' greed
"Hmmm. We COULD just keep on being a steady business with a reliable stream of incone. OR we could get more backing from investors (who will demand to see immediate profits) to try to become a mega-unicorn and betray the people who made us popular in the first place. HMMM."
I mean......"horny men" is one of the greatest drivers of economic growth the world has ever known. They will throw money they -do not have- at whatever excites them!
Now OF is saying "no no...we will instead focus on people paying for monetized versions of celebrity IG Stories"
And, let me add to the thread that creators can still "post nude photos and videos, provided they’re consistent with OnlyFans’ policy.”
The backhalf of that clause is doing a lot of work. And it still turns away anyone who was making money doing “hardcore” vs “softcore” content.
New from me: Kyrsten Sinema, we learned in an Axios article, has a secret weapon in her fight to winnow down Democrats' $3.5 spending plan — spreadsheets
New from me: one thing that ties together the Republican agenda lately is the sheer creativity on display as rules, laws, and norms are bent, twisted, and invented out of whole cloth in the pursuit of power
Meanwhile, Democrats are, well, conservative in how they think about The Rules. And it’s forcing them to fight with one hand tied behind their backs in the face of an onslaught of inventive chaos from the GOP.
wild that everyone who was in charge when we invaded afghanistan and completely fucked it up is now back twenty years later to say that they wouldn't have fucked up in afghanistan if only they were in charge
i could count on one hand the people with national security portfolios from years 2001 - 2004 in particular that i want to hear from on afghanistan to say anything that isn't some variation on "i'm sorry"
fully convinced the op-ed rumsfield would have been commissioned to write would have given me an aneurysm
it’s also about the housing crisis and the racism that’s part and parcel with the housing crisis
a car-centric society is one that thinks that it makes sense to have stores, schools, and other services be several miles away in exchange for bigger, single-family homes. these respondents aren’t biking to and from those places.
But they won’t, because they want to have it both ways. They want to support the priorities and policies of the Democratic Party — but balk at the price tag, in order to show that they’re not beholden to the left-wing of the party.
New from me: within a month after Saigon fell, Congress approved over $450 million in 1975 dollars to get Vietnamese refugees out and resettled in America. We need that same energy now for Afghans
Since I filed this piece, two things have come to my attention. 1) that Biden authorized $500M from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund to help Afghan refugees. 2) this chart :/